lol! You've never read Daniel... your philosophy on history is so fucked up. Try thinking about that for awhile and see if you want to continue to apply it. brb gotta get oatmeal out of abby's hair...
you realize that only you would take that statement seriously because you want it to be so. No serious historian would take that you or that statement seriously. You've been duped.
I was talking about professional historians. lol not some student. I don't know what this Glenn Beck nonsense is...come on. I was only suggesting a dilemma. You know that there is a method of sorting out to the best of our ability what has happened and what hasn't. That allows for Christianity and you know it. To not admit that is hypocrisy.
The more I learned about the bible and history, the less I believed the bible. It was, after all, assembled under the authority and command of a pagan sun worshipper. Funny it came out so closely resembling the religion he already practiced and believed. Then it was "do or die" to everyone else. Naturally, after a hundred or two years it was generally and widely accepted by the masses in that region. Then spread throughout the world via sometimes ruthless and always relentless proselytizers.