Why......???

[mickeyb69]

Arnold was the only one to lose his Mr. Olympia crown and win it back, am I right? He had great symmetry which is also very important in judging. I'd say he's just about the best, top 3 at least. Ronnie Coleman in an interview with Prosource( sorry I don't have the link) said he was the best of all time. Thats pretty good props I'd say

 

[ukkared]

I think half the reason the BB's today have such large legs is because they are a lot shorter than Arnold. I have always thought that it has to be easier to build on a smaller frame than us boys over 6ft.

 

[BigGuyPHX]

I prefer Arnold legs instead of the big trees we see today. Proportion, symetry, shape and size is the way to go for me. Today everybody focus everything first in size, then the rest.

I agree! The days of symetry ended with Lee Haney and pros when size crazy to feed the "industry" mags, sups, etc. Bigger = More $$$

I'm 36 and have been around and followed bodybuilding my entire life. I've talked to several pros and a few Mr.O's in sit down serious talks where I got impression they missed the good old days.

BG

 

[airsmith2k]

i dont care what anyone says....arnold has the best body ive ever seen....all the bodybuilders back in that time looked 10 times better then the ones of today hands down

 

[mobro]

I prefer Arnold legs instead of the big trees we see today. Proportion, symetry, shape and size is the way to go for me. Today everybody focus everything first in size, then the rest.

totally agree

 

[instant.muscle]

did arnold win some european BB competition at the age of 16, he had to sneek out of his boarding school or something, idk if its true but i heard it lol

 

[bottleneckblooz]

i mean what the fuck are you going to do when you are alot older?

I don't think many of todays bodybuilders need to worry about getting "a lot older".

 

[OMEGA]

http://www.schwarzenegger.it/gallery/musclegallery2/xmg116.jpg

that pic to the right is my fav