blut wump
New member
Isn't that called entrapment and grounds for case-dismissal?
You see, if they were to send the goods then it could be argued as entrapment. Clearly, then, they took the money for services that they had no intent to provide. That is fraud.
Anyway, IANAL and I'm just blowing smoke out of any convenient orifice.
You see, if they were to send the goods then it could be argued as entrapment. Clearly, then, they took the money for services that they had no intent to provide. That is fraud.
Anyway, IANAL and I'm just blowing smoke out of any convenient orifice.