Recent info on Ostarine ( MK-2866/s1174 )

[Carlito B]

Even if it were triple the cost it should still be affordable because you only need to run a fraction of the dose. I'm only speculating and hoping though.

I do not know, I have been told the ostarine costs more to manufacture, is like comparing 75mg tren hexahydrobencyl carbonate against 75mg of trenbolone acetate , the tren hex will cost a lot more than the tren ace.

This is a different sarm and can't compare it mg per mg with the S4, maybe 5mgs of ostarine is similar in anabolic effects as 100mg of S4 or maybe less, who knows but I do know perhaps stacking 25mg of S4 plus 3mg or 5mg of ostarine could be a very good stack, then again is too early to assume.

Hopefully sarmssearch can donate some samples to selected individuals so they can start a log when these are available.

 

[Cory151]

I do not know, I have been told the ostarine costs more to manufacture, is like comparing 75mg tren hexahydrobencyl carbonate against 75mg of trenbolone acetate , the tren hex will cost a lot more than the tren ace.

This is a different sarm and can't compare it mg per mg with the S4, maybe 5mgs of ostarine is similar in anabolic effects as 100mg of S4 or maybe less, who knows but I do know perhaps stacking 25mg of S4 plus 3mg or 5mg of ostarine could be a very good stack, then again is too early to assume.

Hopefully sarmssearch can donate some samples to selected individuals so they can start a log when these are available.

Thats a great idea, I just received and started my GH/S4 regiment to see if there is in fact, a synergy when combined. Id love to run the new stuff afterwards for comparison.

 

[Cory151]

I do not know, I have been told the ostarine costs more to manufacture, is like comparing 75mg tren hexahydrobencyl carbonate against 75mg of trenbolone acetate , the tren hex will cost a lot more than the tren ace.

This is a different sarm and can't compare it mg per mg with the S4, maybe 5mgs of ostarine is similar in anabolic effects as 100mg of S4 or maybe less, who knows but I do know perhaps stacking 25mg of S4 plus 3mg or 5mg of ostarine could be a very good stack, then again is too early to assume.

Hopefully sarmssearch can donate some samples to selected individuals so they can start a log when these are available.

Thats a great idea, I just received and started my GH/S4 regiment to see if there is in fact, a synergy when combined. Id love to run the new stuff afterwards for comparison.

I wonder if Ostarine and S-4 actually compete for the same receptors though, more is not always better with sarms?

 

[Carlito B]

I wonder if Ostarine and S-4 actually compete for the same receptors though, more is not always better with sarms?

That is a very good question , guess we will know once any of us dares to stack both sarms.

BTW, I been on a week now and today I did actually 6mgs instead of the planned 10mgs. I must report I have been feeling hungrier than usual and I thought I had some blurred vision last night and earlier this morning ( similar to Clomid ) but is gone and I feel good now. Also there were a couple of times last week that I feel mild and very breef heart palpitations about a couple of hours after I took a dosage but it was no biggie really. Some have reported the same while using the S4.

 

[crulexis]

sorry im a bit confused, so is Ostarine the same as ( MK-2866 or s1174 ) ?

 

[Carlito B]

sorry im a bit confused, so is Ostarine the same as ( MK-2866 or s1174 ) ?

yes it is.

 

[natiels]

I wonder if Ostarine and S-4 actually compete for the same receptors though, more is not always better with sarms?

They elicit their effects by attaching to the androgen receptor and they are both anabolic in skeletal muscle so I think we can assume they both compete for the same receptors.

That probably isnt a big deal though since people have stacked AAS for years (tren/test, test/eq, etc) with positive results and AAS compete for the same receptors too.

 

[Carlito B]

They elicit their effects by attaching to the androgen receptor and they are both anabolic in skeletal muscle so I think we can assume they both compete for the same receptors.

That probably isnt a big deal though since people have stacked AAS for years (tren/test, test/eq, etc) with positive results and AAS compete for the same receptors too.

makes a lot of sense to me.

 

[Cory151]

They elicit their effects by attaching to the androgen receptor and they are both anabolic in skeletal muscle so I think we can assume they both compete for the same receptors.

That probably isnt a big deal though since people have stacked AAS for years (tren/test, test/eq, etc) with positive results and AAS compete for the same receptors too.

Yes but the analogy goes if AAS is carpet bombing your receptors SARMs are a precision guided missile, hence its actually competing for fewer receptor total than AAS.

 

[jacshelb]

Just remember that they may be working on the androgen receptors in a different way. I don't understand it by any means, but my guess is that they keep them somewhat more "active" not necessarily a problem of saturation. i.e. they may possibly increase sensitivity to aas toward the end of a cycle when a tolerance has been built up. Pure speculation on my part I'll admit. I don't really know.