H
heatherrae
Guest
How can something be "reduced" but not "diminished." Oh well, incoherence aside, that isn't the argument that you made before.alien amp pharm said:would you be better pleased if I worded it differently?
"Parents who fail at marriage and life due to circumstances which they CAN controll will TEND to pass their behaviors onto their children whom are being exposed to it throughout maturing. In turn the chances of the children to succeed in life are reduced, but not diminshed"
Is that more PC for you?
First of all, just because someone's marraige fails, doesn't make them a failure at life or a bad parent. There are terrible married parents and great ones. There are terrible unmarried parents and great ones.
Secondly, that is a completely different argument than you made before. You said before that the parents are worthless and it is most probable that their children will be too so that there is no need in even trying to educate these children.
So, who all doesn't get an education and should just stay home? Is it kids of divorced parents, kids of single parents, kids whose parents are on public assistance, kids whose parents are in jail? Which ones are the worthless ones that don't get a chance at education?