Nazi Eyewitness' warning to America: "Don't Let Freedom Slip Away"

[needtogetaas]

 

[BBR100]

hansel being hansel. anything to put a positive on hitler

lol at eyewitness

 

[needtogetaas]

Exactly

 

[kx250rider]

1) Obama has barely touched the issue of gun control

2) How can you possibly associate Obama with censorship compared to other presidents?

4) Bush was the one who started bailing out the autos

6) Who the fuck doesn't wan't job creation

I'm not the biggest Obama fan either but get the fuck out of here if you are going to try and say he is like Hitler

I stated facts, and I said I hope he ISN'T like Hitler in that he better not use his charisma to lead the sheep to do evil, hurt, kill, etc... Leading us to being bankrupt is bad enough. I have never read or heard anything from him in support of gun rights, and he has made statements that he favors severe gun control laws (I added a link & quote below). I'll give him credit for not trying to re-up the assault rifle ban, which President Bush laid to expire. However, when I add up the statements by President Obama, I do not find in any way that he is in favor of the freedom of gun ownership. Just limited bits & pieces, and ultimately a total ban, is my guess. He just didn't want to lose the Rightwing anti-Bush vote.

Regarding the GM bailout, you are correct that it began it's infancy under Bush, but here's the article telling how Senator Obama pushed and pushed for Bush to do it, and remember that the Dems were as good as 100% in control of both Houses when that was done. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...neral-Motors-save-5-000-British-car-jobs.html

I'm the first one on this board to apologize when I make a mistake, and honestly I don't see any mistake in what I said. This is a situation where either side can bend things in the angle to their view, and you're as welcome to do that as I am, as long as we state facts.

Job creation is great, but who's gonna pay??? He's not making any effort to make it possible for companies and small business to expand or hire anyone. If he wants jobs created (which actually is a term that makes me laugh, since a "created" job in the literal sense means monkeybusiness or an unnecessary job in the first place). The only job's he's "created", are government jobs, as did Hitler. Make it feasible to build a business and make good money AND KEEP IT, and the job market will soar. It's been proven over & over again, but the problem is that people get jealous of the hard workers, and they demand too much, and the whole capitalism system breaks down. You can't have socialism and capitalism together, and the only ONLY reason why America ever was the country that it was, is capitalism. Mom & Pop borrow money and open a store, and sell goods... They hire a kid or two to help, and then when the mortgage is paid off, they hire a manager, who hires a bookkeeper, and they all make a fair living. Mom & Pop sell the store to the manager, and take the money to invest in a grocery warehouse.... The grocery warehouse partners then hire dozens of people and order trucks and hire contractors to build bigger buildings, etc etc... Enter the Socialists, and tax them up the rectum, and they can't afford any of that, and they give up.

And just for the record, my friend of whom I spoke in the first post who escaped Hitler's regime, says exactly what I am saying in the comparison between Obama and Hitler, as well as other socialist leaders. He and I both voted for other candidates than Obama (we didn't vote for the same one), but we both voted for Bush both times. I see that President Bush might live to be 150, and still get blamed for stuff he didn't do, and get blamed for good stuff he did which went foul under his successor. President Bush was probably in the running for the world's worst communicator, and Obama is one of the finest. Believe me, if Bush had been able to figure out how to speak, he'd be a hero today, even if he had done every single thing exactly the same as he did; just if he introduced it differently and explained it better. Obama speaks so well that he could sell us the Brooklyn Bridge easily, but he probably owes too much on it by now, LOL.... President Bush came across as a bungling idiot sometimes, but he is a brilliant businessman, and has the experience and skills to make the economy good. Obama can take a bowl of sh*t and present it as if it's gold, but I wouldn't even trust his business sense to mind a lemonade stand for 10 minutes... I'd come back, and it would be out of lemons, and in debt somehow, and a bunch of lazy welfare recipients would be sitting in the shade drinking free lemonade.

Charles

From Obama's campaign:
What is Barack Obama's position on gun control?


In an Illinois Senate Debate on Oct 21, 2004:
I think it is a scandal that this president did not authorize a renewal of the assault weapons ban.

In The Audacity of Hope (p215)
I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturer's lobby.

In 2007 NAACP Presidential Primary Forum on Jul 12, 2007
We've got to make sure that unscrupulous gun dealers aren't loading up vans and dumping guns in our communities, because we know they're not made in our communities.

As quoted in From Promise to Power, by David Mendell (p.250-251)
I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry. This was a narrow exception in an exceptional circumstance where a retired police officer might find himself vulnerable as a consequence of the work he has previously done--and had been trained extensively in the proper use of firearms.


http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_Barack_Obama's_position_on_gun_control

With all that said, I will offer an apology to anyone who is offended by the mention of Hitler or the Nazi regime, and/or any comparisons between the German politics in the 1930s and the American politics in the 2010s. I apologize with the explanation that by completely suppressing any acknowledgement of the Holocaust or Hitler, we are WIDE-OPEN to another Hitler at some time.

 

[mrplunkey]

I may be misunderstanding but so you're talking about current doctors in the U.S. Becoming less productive, not the U.S. actually losing that percentage of doctors, correct?

I imagine there's a big difference between losing 70% of doctors completely and losing no doctors, but having 50% of them not work productively. The doctors we'd keep are still doing more work at 60% productivity than the late 30's-early 40's Jewish Austrian doctors working at 0% productivity. No?

Regardless, my statement wasn't for or against socialized healthcare and what that may or may not do to medical productivity.

My point was that this story is conservative propaganda in that it's leading these people who don't bother to question her story's credentials to believe that we're in the same position as early Hitler-controlled Austria, and that is just not the case.

This woman leaves lots of important details out of her story to make it relate to scared Americans.

I'm saying we are losing doctors from three sources.

1) doctors are retiring earlier and not entering the system at a rate to keep up with need.

2) the doctors who remain are less productive, because they are shifting from small business owners to company men on the clock (some of that is generational).

3) of the remaining doctors, some no longer take (or limit) Medicare/Medicaid patients.

 

[kx250rider]

I'm saying we are losing doctors from three sources.

1) doctors are retiring earlier and not entering the system at a rate to keep up with need.

2) the doctors who remain are less productive, because they are shifting from small business owners to company men on the clock (some of that is generational).

3) of the remaining doctors, some no longer take (or limit) Medicare/Medicaid patients.

One of my doctors has bought a house in Panama, and is moving her practice there... And my endocrinologist stopped taking any type of insurance or any public aid as of last year, and now is 100% cash on the barrel head.

And lots of luck trying to find an obstetrician in California... You might find a 29-year-old inexperienced Mideastern one, but that's about it. The experienced American OB's were run out of state over the last 20 years by freedom to sue for everything that possibly can go wrong; doctor error of Act of God.

Charles

 

[hanselthecaretaker]

To the people who don't know how to read between the lines, no one ever said Obama=Hitler.

The whole point of the article is to point out the fact that big government with a lust for power will destroy a country and its freedoms.

Christ. Do they still teach reading comprehension in public schools these days, or has government already taken that away too.

 

[jackangel]

lolz?

 

[nimbus]

I stated facts, and I said I hope he ISN'T like Hitler in that he better not use his charisma to lead the sheep to do evil, hurt, kill, etc... Leading us to being bankrupt is bad enough. I have never read or heard anything from him in support of gun rights, and he has made statements that he favors severe gun control laws (I added a link & quote below). I'll give him credit for not trying to re-up the assault rifle ban, which President Bush laid to expire. However, when I add up the statements by President Obama, I do not find in any way that he is in favor of the freedom of gun ownership. Just limited bits & pieces, and ultimately a total ban, is my guess. He just didn't want to lose the Rightwing anti-Bush vote.

Regarding the GM bailout, you are correct that it began it's infancy under Bush, but here's the article telling how Senator Obama pushed and pushed for Bush to do it, and remember that the Dems were as good as 100% in control of both Houses when that was done. Barack Obama urges Bush to bail out General Motors and save 5,000 British car jobs | Mail Online

I'm the first one on this board to apologize when I make a mistake, and honestly I don't see any mistake in what I said. This is a situation where either side can bend things in the angle to their view, and you're as welcome to do that as I am, as long as we state facts.

Job creation is great, but who's gonna pay??? He's not making any effort to make it possible for companies and small business to expand or hire anyone. If he wants jobs created (which actually is a term that makes me laugh, since a "created" job in the literal sense means monkeybusiness or an unnecessary job in the first place). The only job's he's "created", are government jobs, as did Hitler. Make it feasible to build a business and make good money AND KEEP IT, and the job market will soar. It's been proven over & over again, but the problem is that people get jealous of the hard workers, and they demand too much, and the whole capitalism system breaks down. You can't have socialism and capitalism together, and the only ONLY reason why America ever was the country that it was, is capitalism. Mom & Pop borrow money and open a store, and sell goods... They hire a kid or two to help, and then when the mortgage is paid off, they hire a manager, who hires a bookkeeper, and they all make a fair living. Mom & Pop sell the store to the manager, and take the money to invest in a grocery warehouse.... The grocery warehouse partners then hire dozens of people and order trucks and hire contractors to build bigger buildings, etc etc... Enter the Socialists, and tax them up the rectum, and they can't afford any of that, and they give up.

And just for the record, my friend of whom I spoke in the first post who escaped Hitler's regime, says exactly what I am saying in the comparison between Obama and Hitler, as well as other socialist leaders. He and I both voted for other candidates than Obama (we didn't vote for the same one), but we both voted for Bush both times. I see that President Bush might live to be 150, and still get blamed for stuff he didn't do, and get blamed for good stuff he did which went foul under his successor. President Bush was probably in the running for the world's worst communicator, and Obama is one of the finest. Believe me, if Bush had been able to figure out how to speak, he'd be a hero today, even if he had done every single thing exactly the same as he did; just if he introduced it differently and explained it better. Obama speaks so well that he could sell us the Brooklyn Bridge easily, but he probably owes too much on it by now, LOL.... President Bush came across as a bungling idiot sometimes, but he is a brilliant businessman, and has the experience and skills to make the economy good. Obama can take a bowl of sh*t and present it as if it's gold, but I wouldn't even trust his business sense to mind a lemonade stand for 10 minutes... I'd come back, and it would be out of lemons, and in debt somehow, and a bunch of lazy welfare recipients would be sitting in the shade drinking free lemonade.

Charles

From Obama's campaign:
What is Barack Obama's position on gun control?


In an Illinois Senate Debate on Oct 21, 2004:
I think it is a scandal that this president did not authorize a renewal of the assault weapons ban.

In The Audacity of Hope (p215)
I believe in keeping guns out of our inner cities, and that our leaders must say so in the face of the gun manufacturer's lobby.

In 2007 NAACP Presidential Primary Forum on Jul 12, 2007
We've got to make sure that unscrupulous gun dealers aren't loading up vans and dumping guns in our communities, because we know they're not made in our communities.

As quoted in From Promise to Power, by David Mendell (p.250-251)
I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry. This was a narrow exception in an exceptional circumstance where a retired police officer might find himself vulnerable as a consequence of the work he has previously done--and had been trained extensively in the proper use of firearms.


What is Barack Obama's position on gun control

With all that said, I will offer an apology to anyone who is offended by the mention of Hitler or the Nazi regime, and/or any comparisons between the German politics in the 1930s and the American politics in the 2010s. I apologize with the explanation that by completely suppressing any acknowledgement of the Holocaust or Hitler, we are WIDE-OPEN to another Hitler at some time.

you implied that Obama is turning the U.S. into Nazi Germany using faulty examples, that is what you did wrong IMO

 

[AFeedz]

To the people who don't know how to read between the lines, no one ever said Obama=Hitler.

The whole point of the article is to point out the fact that big government with a lust for power will destroy a country and its freedoms.

Christ. Do they still teach reading comprehension in public schools these days, or has government already taken that away too.

The power=destruction thing is the surface.

The Obama=Hitler thing is between the lines. She likely doesn't actually think that, but she's drawing obvious, though errant, parallels between events in Nazi Austria and the current U.S. to scare her ignorant listeners.

You're naive to think otherwise. This woman speaks at conservative rallies and conferences around the country and works for the Eagle Forum so Lol @ thinking this spiel doesn't have a hidden "Obama is evil" agenda.