Samir Bannout (google a pic those of you who aren't familiar) won mr olympia in the early 80's and he was 5 6 and "ONLY" 195..
so i agree just going by how much someone weighs is unfair. and it works both ways. there was a dude on here who was 5 6 and 215 and claimed to be 12% body fat and I gave him shit about as I did not believe him that he weighed that much at that height without being very fat.. he posted a pic and i ate crow. he was built like a tank.
there are some 6 footers who are only 190 that i have seen that look 220-230.. why? cause their legs aren't developed enough even though they work them.. maybe just a shitty genetic thing but its something they gotta work on more. but i do notice a lot of the shorter dudes like me have enormous legs due to a lot of different factors. so OP you gotta hit your legs more.. should be an advantage at your height not a crutch.
so i agree just going by how much someone weighs is unfair. and it works both ways. there was a dude on here who was 5 6 and 215 and claimed to be 12% body fat and I gave him shit about as I did not believe him that he weighed that much at that height without being very fat.. he posted a pic and i ate crow. he was built like a tank.
there are some 6 footers who are only 190 that i have seen that look 220-230.. why? cause their legs aren't developed enough even though they work them.. maybe just a shitty genetic thing but its something they gotta work on more. but i do notice a lot of the shorter dudes like me have enormous legs due to a lot of different factors. so OP you gotta hit your legs more.. should be an advantage at your height not a crutch.