My take on the bulking vs non-bulking is this:
While I believe it IS possible to not put on extra fat and still gain quality muscle, the diet, amount of cardio, intensity/quality of ones workouts and the knowledge of how ones body works and responds to different stimuli, would be immense.
In other words, your diet would ABSOLUTELY have to PERFECT. Your workouts would HAVE to be PERFECT for your body type. You would also HAVE to know EXACTLY how your body will respond to different workouts, sets, reps, TUT, etc...
Most of us are still always learning about all of these things, and do not have close to perfection in any of them. (Some may be better than others.) One could spend literally YEARS trying to find the perfect answer to all of them, and still never find it.
It's much easier and, in many cases, more effective both in the short and long term, to live with the excess fat for the short term to gain the muscle, then cut the fat.
No one is telling you are wrong. But many of the guys in here have years of experience doing this. I am sure that all of us wanted the same thing at one time during our lifting "career". If you notice, the vets have all come to the same conclusion. And I don't think I will argue with Bouncers, Needsizes ans others physiques. They speak for themselves.
Just my .02,
Joker