Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Example of how Bibllical History is contrived (made up)

People are gay because their relatives raped them when they were young?

The only thing this thread right here has proven is there are dumb ass Christians out there so wrapped up in their own hallucinations that reality must be on a different planet for them. With exhibits like these, no wonder people laugh at them so much.
 
Science, by definition, can't be wrong. It is merely a set of observations and likely explanations. Nothing is claimed to be 100% true with no chance of being false. Even laws are proven untrue sometimes. However, unlike Christianity, if something that was believed in science can be proven untrue, or less likely than another explanation, science is will change the dominate theory. Unlike Christianity which will instead make up some lame/completely out there excuse and never admit to being wrong ('The devil did it to trick us!', or 'It's there to test your faith')
 
JonPee said:
Science, by definition, can't be wrong. It is merely a set of observations and likely explanations. Nothing is claimed to be 100% true with no chance of being false. Even laws are proven untrue sometimes. However, unlike Christianity, if something that was believed in science can be proven untrue, or less likely than another explanation, science is will change the dominate theory. Unlike Christianity which will instead make up some lame/completely out there excuse and never admit to being wrong ('The devil did it to trick us!', or 'It's there to test your faith')

Good call
 
Lestat said:
so basically your copy of the Bible doesn't say that David killed Goliath.

yet how many people teach that story to their children?
yes it does say that David killed Goliath. Everything is the same, except where it says "teh brother of Goloath" - there is no "brother. So there is actually 2 people that killed Goliath...lol :lmao:In teh Davids story he is reffered as Goliath only once, when he came out of teh tent
 
ok, seriously, for all those that blindly believe in the Bible - please open your eyes. You tell us to read the Devine book and we have. Now you read soemthing that we recomend. Go read "The Bible as history" by Werner Keller. You will find proof that things happened as the Bible describes - the historical events like battles or description where a certain prophet lived etc. Also you will find a lot of misteries unveiled (like the birds that fell off the sky and Moses told the Israely people its a miracle from God), a lot of them explained and quite a lot of them that dont make any sence and cant be placed in any time of history (like Joseph being a vesir for the pharaoh, impossible cuz Egyptians saw Jews as the lowest level of nation, the most hated). The flood, the running away from Egypt, the water from teh rock, the burning bush....all this is analized from every possible aspect.


Lets say the story of Adam and Eve was really true. That God (the all loving God) casted all the misery upon the rest of the human race because his children didnt obey him. Lets say you are a mother and are making some choclate chip cookies cuz guests are coming. Your two kids are staring at the oven and you know that they are just gonna be all over the cookies and you tell them - dont you dare touch them, if you do you will be grounded and punished. Well, you take them out of the oven and place them on the kitchen counter. Kids as kids, curious, they go and take a cookie and eat it. You come back, see their faces covered with cookie crumbles and you do what? Kick them out of the house and curse them that them and their own kids and their grand kids and so on live in misery for eternety? I dont think so.
 
foreigngirl said:
ok, seriously, for all those that blindly believe in the Bible - please open your eyes. You tell us to read the Devine book and we have. Now you read soemthing that we recomend. Go read "The Bible as history" by Werner Keller. You will find proof that things happened as the Bible describes - the historical events like battles or description where a certain prophet lived etc. Also you will find a lot of misteries unveiled (like the birds that fell off the sky and Moses told the Israely people its a miracle from God), a lot of them explained and quite a lot of them that dont make any sence and cant be placed in any time of history (like Joseph being a vesir for the pharaoh, impossible cuz Egyptians saw Jews as the lowest level of nation, the most hated). The flood, the running away from Egypt, the water from teh rock, the burning bush....all this is analized from every possible aspect.


Lets say the story of Adam and Eve was really true. That God (the all loving God) casted all the misery upon the rest of the human race because his children didnt obey him. Lets say you are a mother and are making some choclate chip cookies cuz guests are coming. Your two kids are staring at the oven and you know that they are just gonna be all over the cookies and you tell them - dont you dare touch them, if you do you will be grounded and punished. Well, you take them out of the oven and place them on the kitchen counter. Kids as kids, curious, they go and take a cookie and eat it. You come back, see their faces covered with cookie crumbles and you do what? Kick them out of the house and curse them that them and their own kids and their grand kids and so on live in misery for eternety? I dont think so.
the only problem is...
God didnt cast trouble upon us... we've brought it upon ourselves...
He only lets us... so it is our will...
 
theprofessor said:
the only problem is...
God didnt cast trouble upon us... we've brought it upon ourselves...
He only lets us... so it is our will...
you are missing the point of my example. If your kids didnt listen to you only once, and you are all loving father as God is, would you throw them out of your blessed and fruitfull house into the cruel world when they are not prepared for it one bit? Would you really never take them back? Would you tell your daughter - because you ate this cookie that I told you not to, you will suffer in childbirth? Would YOU as a father be as cruel as God was towards his first children that were just curious as your own?
 
theprofessor said:
the only problem is...
God didnt cast trouble upon us... we've brought it upon ourselves...
He only lets us... so it is our will...

If god created everything (which the bible clearly states he did) then he created evil and hell and suffering and torment. We could only bring upon ourselves something that previously existed. I'm sure you will deny that god created all these things, which leads me to point out another contradiction. The bible said god did create EVERYTHING. Well torment and hate is apart of EVERYTHING. So either god didn't create everything (even though the bible said he did) or he is a hateful asshole that likes to torture people. Take your pick. Another contradiction: How can anything imperfect come from something perfect? If god is perfect, and he created everything, then how does anything imperfect exist? You say he gave us free will. Well if free will is not perfect, then how could it come from a perfect god. It is impossible for anything imperfect to come from something perfect by definition of perfection. So either hate and sin and torment and evil are also perfect, or god is not perfect. Take your pick, it's a contradiction for god to be perfect and for anything imperfect to exist if everything came from him. So many contradictions in the bible. Christianity is probably one of the most screwed up religions in existence.
 
How can one USE the Bible to discredit the Bible? How can you accept one portion as truth and not the other? Why is Second Samueel the truth and First Samuel not?


You can't have it both days. All I know is those who reject the Bible will stand before a Holy God and every knee shall bow and you will acknowledge He is God.

Lestat said:
So we all know David Killed Goliath right? As kids Christians are taught the story that a boy named David used a sling and stone to kill a Giant right?

Guess again! If this was fabricated, imagine how many other things are.

The Myth: And the Philistine [i.e., Goliath] came on and drew near unto David; and the man that bare the shield went before him. And when the Philistine looked about, and saw David, he disdained him: for he was but a youth, and ruddy, and of a fair countenance. And the Philistine said unto David, Am I a dog, that thou comest to me with staves? And the Philistine cursed David by his gods. And the Philistine said to David, Come to me, and I will give thy flesh unto the fowls of the air, and to the beasts of the field. Then said David to the Philistine, Thou comest to me with a sword, and with a spear, and with a shield: but I come to thee in the name of the LORD of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied. This day will the LORD deliver thee into mine hand; and I will smite thee, and take thine head from thee; and I will give the carcases of the host of the Philistines this day unto the fowls of the air, and to the wild beasts of the earth; that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel. And all this assembly shall know that the LORD saveth not with sword and spear: for the battle is the Lord’s, and he will give you into our hands. And it came to pass, when the Philistine arose, and came and drew nigh to meet David, that David hasted, and ran toward the army to meet the Philistine. And David put his hand in his bag, and took thence a stone, and slang it, and smote the Philistine in his forehead, that the stone sunk into his forehead; and he fell upon his face to the earth. So David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and with a stone, and smote the Philistine, and slew him; but there was no sword in the hand of David. Therefore David ran, and stood upon the Philistine, and took his sword, and drew it out of the sheath thereof, and slew him, and cut off his head therewith. And when the Philistines saw their champion was dead, they fled. (1 Sam. 17:41-51.)

The Reality: The real killer of Goliath was Elhanan, who belonged to “The Thirty,” King David’s elite fighting cadre.

The story of how young David armed with only a slingshot and stones defeated a well-armored giant Philistine warrior named Goliath has become one of the most famous tales in all the bible. The slain enemy’s name has become a synonym for “huge” and the phrase “David and Goliath” has become a literary cliché for a confrontation between opponents of unequal strength. Unfortunately, David didn’t kill Goliath, and he wasn’t a youth when Goliath died.

According to the King James translation of 2 Sam. 21:19,

And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaareoregim, a Bethlehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.

Although this translation says Elhanan slew the brother of Goliath, the words “the brother of” do not appear in the Hebrew text. The actual wording of the passage says that Elhanan slew Goliath, not his brother.

The addition of these words in the English translation came about for two reasons. One, the translators didn’t want to contradict the earlier story attributing the act to David, especially since David is so dramatically linked to Christ in Christian tradition. (Christ’s credentials as Messiah, according to biblical prophesies, depend upon his descent from David.) Two, the author of 1 Chr. 20:5, written centuries after the verse in 2 Sam 21:17 and faced with the same contradiction, wrote,

Elhanan the son of Jair slew Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, whose spear staff was like a weaver’s beam.
The English translators, relying on 1 Chr. 20:5, inserted the words “the brother of” into 2 Sam. 21:19.

Several clues indicate that later redactors gave David credit for what had originally been attributed to Elhanan.

In the version crediting David, after Goliath is slain, Saul says,

Whose son is this youth? And Abner said, As thy soul liveth, O king, I cannot tell. And the king said, Inquire thou whose son the stripling is. (1 Sam. 17:55.)

If David were the killer, Saul would have known who he was because David was already a favorite in the royal court.

And David came to Saul, and stood before him: and he loved him greatly; and he became his armourbearer. And Saul sent to Jesse, saying, Let David, I pray thee, stand before me; for he hath found favour in my sight. (1 Sam. 16:21-22.)

If David found favor in Saul’s sight, how could Saul not know whom he had just sent out to fight with Goliath?

After David killed Goliath, the text says that he brought the head to Jerusalem, but during Saul’s reign Jerusalem was in the hands of the Jebusites. It didn’t come into Israelite hands, according to the bible, until after David became king. This suggests that in the original story David was already king when Goliath died.

Coincidentally, in the version crediting Elhanan with killing Goliath, David is already king, and Elhanan is a member of David’ elite fighting group known as “The Thirty.”

The Elhanan version also retains some of the original mythical flavor of the contest. It is one of a sequence of four short stories about individual members of “The Thirty” killing four different giants. Interestingly, in the introductory verse to these four stories about Elhanan and the others, we are told that “David waxed faint,” had grown tired.

Although Elhanan’s father is called Jaareoregim in the verses about Elhanan’s victory over Goliath, the listing of the members of David’s “Thirty” calls the father Dodo. Since the other three giant killers also belong to “The Thirty,” this is the clearly same Elhanan. The connection between Elhanan and Dodo may have been the inspiration for crediting David with Elhanan’s triumph. In Hebrew, the name Dodo is spelled DWDW and David is spelled DWD. The two names are virtually identical and stem from the same root, meaning “beloved.” Dodo and David are also both called Bethlehemites, adding another reason why there may have been confusion over the killer’s identity.

Another indication that the pro-David version of the story borrowed from the Elhanan source comes from the contextual appearance of Goliath’s name. Throughout the David story, the name Goliath only appears twice. The several other references to this warrior simply describe him as “the Philistine” or “the Philistine of Gath.” The manner in which Goliath’s name appears suggests that it was a later insert into the story. For example, in 1 Sam. 17:23, the text reads,

And as he talked with them, behold, there came up the champion, the Philistine of Gath, Goliath by name, out of the armies of the Philistines, and spake according to the same words: and David heard them.

Since the bible had already given Goliath’s name earlier in the story and had already described his great prowess, the phrase “Philistine of Gath, Goliath by name” the addition of the words “by name” sounds artificial.

Originally, the slaying of Goliath was one of a collection of tales in which many heroes slew giants. Elhanan was one of these valiant warriors as were other members of “The Thirty,” many of whom were credited with such victories. “The Thirty” itself may have been a mythical group much like Arthur’s Knights of the Round Table. As David became the greatest hero of the Judaean court and Judaeans were eager to believe their founding king capable of great deeds, his substitution for one of the other giant killers took no great suspension of credibility.
 
Exactly

Apparently you get this junk from a website because you have a beef with Christianity or some cult offshoot.

The reality of what happened in the second set of verses you reference is at the top of the book:

1 Then there was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year; and David enquired of the LORD. And the LORD answered, It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, because he slew the Gibeonites.

David was KING in the second set of verses you reference. Therefore, this was another battle with Philistines and giants as the end of the book indicates.

You ought to read it for yourself rather than quoting misinformed websites.
 
Top Bottom