I can make a nice piece presenting my theories on quantum physics too. It might even sound okay to the lay public (because I'm smooth like that
) but anyone with a bit of knowledge in the field would know I don't have a damn clue. It ranks up there with most BBing publications and pieces out there - utter trash bordering on ethical irresponsibility. Really, by Rippetoe's book at
www.startingstrength.com or any of the following if you want to really learn about training and programming:
Supertraining
Science and Practice of Strength Training
A System of Multi Year Training in Weightlifting
Fundmentals of Special Strength Training in Sport
Managing the Training of Weightlifters
I wouldn't waste my time or even an ounce of recovery on them unless there was some specific issue (meaning a problem or imbalance, they have no place in a general desire to gain size program). This stuff is right there with kickbacks. Your time is spent better doing rotator cuff work by a large margin.
First, if you think you'll get a wide back faster just forget about that.
Second, I'd be very leary of this. It can work but in the overwhelming majority of cases most people need rowing strength far more than they need pullup strength. A properly executed row is the same plane as the bench and too many people have rows that are far far weaker than their bench - this leads to imbalances and possible injury. Either way, I think you'd be disappointed in the results simply because rows are better at adding mass and activate the lats in a major way. Use the plain vanilla and save it for future experimentations (i.e. that way you'll know it doesn't work as well or in some case might be used to address something specific). Note: much of this future experimentation never gets done because people don't like screwing with it after they see how well it works.