Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up now!

Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

siamesedream said:
I got my ass demolished in the gym today. Today ends the 4th week of the single-factor for me, and I wasn't able to row for 2 reps what I did for 5 on Monday. I was totally fucking drained today and I had to cut out my close-grip benching. Since I'm forced to take a week off next week due to travelling, I think it'll do me a ton of good. My diet is so low-calorie though that it may a huge contribution to me feeling like a complete bum today.
Reading journals and everything on here and descriptions of the 5x5, it seems as though one of the most important factors is eating with caloric-excess, as even madcow says himself. With my main goal of losing 50 pounds of fat but also getting myself to a nice, muscular body, I hope this 5x5 allows me to meet that goal. I'd like to be doing more cardio on my cardio bike but my legs get demolished when doing HIIT while also squatting as much as I am. I wasn't able to increase my bench today, so I get discouraged and need something to blame and hope it's my diet since I'm kicking my own ass as hard as I possibly can. Is it even possible for me to expect to make hulking gains or to gain muscle while I still have such a large amount of fat to lose (21-24% bodyfat)? I suppose I'm talking out of my ass and just need some advice since I feel like a total waste right now.
Hey, Siamesedream, I think you're skinny at 21-24%. :)

Seriously, though, it's a very fine balancing act between working off that fat and growing muscle at the same time. At those bodyfat levels it most definitely can be done. Doing it while persuing a harsh diet might be another matter. If you are on a harsh cutting diet then you are moving that sliding scale way over into catabolism and growing muscle will be much harder. You have to decide how rapidly you want that fat to melt away. I go for slow and steady and I try to feed the beast to grow muscle and accept that my weight isn't always going down.

It sounds to me that you're doing the right things with the exercise. I have found that when I decide to drop a lot of weight by eating way fewer calories then my lifts start to fall.

With any luck a week of deloading will help a lot. Try to do some exercise rather than none at all.
 
Yeah don't get discouraged until the week off. If you still feel like ass after the rest then up the cals a bit.

You're asking a lot of yourself by doing a demanding program and using a restrictive diet. It'd be wierd if it was never tough like that.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Dr Pump said:
hmmm.. i think i get it now

i'll tell u what i interpreted.
1) warm ups are done for any ammount of sets till you feel sufficiently warmed up. Reps to be kept at 5.

2) 1x5 and 5x5 are 2 different things

3)weight increases made each successive week.

4)Wednesday squat is suppose to be easy :)

The way i feel atm is that i can keep doing friday squats. I seem to be just a bit sore from wednesday but can still do 1x5. Reckon i should leave the entire friday workout for deload and intensity instead of cutting it out? or will this lead to overtraining? I just cant seem to accept that working out 2 times a week will actually be better than my old 6x a week workouts!

and the image i attached, where can i upload it so everyone can see it?

Thanks Guiness5.0 been a big help
1) If you are someone who likes to take a huge quantity of very light warmups then make some kind of mental distinction between pure warmup and semi-working warmups. Personally, I discount anything less than around 40% as pure warmup. For these do whatever floats your boat. After that point, for the 1x5 exercises, essentially you should do a 5x5 with weight increasing to a top set. I hope that's clear: the 1x5 exercises are a ramped 5x5 rather than a flat 5x5.

2) Yes. The 5x5 exercises are a flat 5x5 after you've done your warmups. You'll probably end up doing more actual sets, including the warmups. The weight is going to be lower than your top 1x5 set, for obvious reasons.

3) Insert your current best effort for 1x5 and for 5x5 into the first of the last two weeks of your Volume Phase. Ramp up to those weights in the earlier weeks. Beat them in the final Volume week.

4) Wednesday squat is about 15-20% of your Monday squat. Maybe in week1 you'd start it at around 15% and increase it more slowly so that at the end of the Volume phase it's closer to 20%.

Of course you can still do 1x5. Choose the weight appropriately.

During the Deload/Intensity Phase, you have the choice of the two protocols. They each work well.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Blut Wump said:
1) If you are someone who likes to take a huge quantity of very light warmups then make some kind of mental distinction between pure warmup and semi-working warmups. Personally, I discount anything less than around 40% as pure warmup. For these do whatever floats your boat. After that point, for the 1x5 exercises, essentially you should do a 5x5 with weight increasing to a top set. I hope that's clear: the 1x5 exercises are a ramped 5x5 rather than a flat 5x5.

2) Yes. The 5x5 exercises are a flat 5x5 after you've done your warmups. You'll probably end up doing more actual sets, including the warmups. The weight is going to be lower than your top 1x5 set, for obvious reasons.

3) Insert your current best effort for 1x5 and for 5x5 into the first of the last two weeks of your Volume Phase. Ramp up to those weights in the earlier weeks. Beat them in the final Volume week.

4) Wednesday squat is about 15-20% of your Monday squat. Maybe in week1 you'd start it at around 15% and increase it more slowly so that at the end of the Volume phase it's closer to 20%.

Of course you can still do 1x5. Choose the weight appropriately.

During the Deload/Intensity Phase, you have the choice of the two protocols. They each work well.

Big thanks Blut Wump.

my only concern is point three

3) Insert your current best effort for 1x5 and for 5x5 into the first of the last two weeks of your Volume Phase. Ramp up to those weights in the earlier weeks. Beat them in the final Volume week.

i can just get 1x5 with 80kg and just get 5x5 with 75kg. That is, final rep is last one i can possibaly do by myself. For instance next week can i make 1x5 84 and 5x5 79? My smallest weight jumps possible is 4kg due to lack of disks. And say i completed my new weight, the week after that my 1x5 is up another 4kg and same with the 5x5. And the trend goes on until i have to deload. Is this right?

Thanks again
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Dr Pump said:
Big thanks Blut Wump.

my only concern is point three

3) Insert your current best effort for 1x5 and for 5x5 into the first of the last two weeks of your Volume Phase. Ramp up to those weights in the earlier weeks. Beat them in the final Volume week.

i can just get 1x5 with 80kg and just get 5x5 with 75kg. That is, final rep is last one i can possibaly do by myself. For instance next week can i make 1x5 84 and 5x5 79? My smallest weight jumps possible is 4kg due to lack of disks. And say i completed my new weight, the week after that my 1x5 is up another 4kg and same with the 5x5. And the trend goes on until i have to deload. Is this right?

Thanks again
If you begin the program with PRs of 80Kg for 1x5 and 75Kg for 5x5 then, assuming you are running a 4-week Volume phase, you'd intend for these, or a shade better, to be your week 3 targets. If you make the week3 weights, you'd increase for week4.

In weeks 1 and 2 you'd go a lot lighter with week 2 somewhere between the target in week3 and a very comfortable week1 weight. Think of the four weeks as Easy-Medium-Hard-Harder and choose the weights appropriately for the early weeks. Some people have run longer than four weeks for a Volume phase to build up their level of conditioning.

If you prefer to be breaking records each week as a general way of working out then maybe the Single-Factor version might be better suited for you. There's a link to it on the Table of Contents of this thread. Anotherbutters has an excellent log of his own progress on the Single-Factor version.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Thanks B-Dub.

I think everyone should start off on the single factor! Here me out... I see a lot of questions about how to implement the dual factor and when weights are mentioned, they're often fairly low, indicating that the person hasn't been lifting long. I'm a culprit of this too - I started off on the dual factor because I didn't know any better.

When someone starts lifting, the gains come quickly for the first year or two. The single factor is perfect for these guys and will pack on muscle quickly. It's easy to follow and if you miss a few days here or there, there are no dire consequences.

But for someone who has been lifting for a year or two, the single factor isn't sufficient any more and the dual factor needs to be used. The gains are probably slower and you need to follow the schedule and choose your weights carefully so that you don't blow your 9 week cycle.

If you think of a sliding scale from newbie to experienced lifter, the single factor is at one end, the dual factor is at the other, and there's a transition period in the middle. Determining where you are on that scale and whether the single or dual factor is more applicable to you is impossible without testing yourself.

So I recommend that everyone starts on the single factor, which is here again: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4497774&postcount=15. The person should stay on the single factor until they stall for a couple of weeks. That is the thing that determines when they move into the transition phase (as I like to think of it), which I'd base on the information here: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4658227&postcount=235. And that phase leads you into doing the dual factor as and when you need it. The progression from single to dual factor should be driven by the results from each week's workout, i.e. real feedback, not the person deciding they're 'experienced'.

Sorry, this wasn't meant to sound like a rant and it wasn't directed at anyone in particular! I just think real feedback is a useful way of determining where you should be in the 5x5 program as a whole. Hell, even experienced lifters might do well on the single factor for a couple of months if they're new to these particular lifts, e.g. BB'ers used to isolation exercises. That's why I'd recommend everyone start at the beginning.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Excellent article B-Dub. That's exactly what I'm talking about.

It's a shame the 5x5 table of contents goes straight into DF rather than taking you along path from beginner to advanced, from SF to DF.
 
This will be my last post about the 5x5 for awhile, maybe until January or so. I want to say thanks to all the awesome guys here who took the time to help me out. I only did 4 weeks on the 5x5 and was doing a major cutting diet, but I looked back and saw that I actually increased my bench max by 15 pounds and my squat max by 20 pounds. This program actually did work even while doing a major cutting diet. Anyways, I'm going to try that 12-week body-for-life thing, since I've made the decision that my only concern is to get my damn 6-pack to show right now. This will allow me to do much more HIIT than I could handle on the 5x5, and the training program is endurance training rather than strength training to make it more of a cardio thing. As soon as I finally look good, I'm hopping right back on the 5x5 program to bulk up and I'll actually eat like I'm supposed to. Just to make sure I don't get fat again, I'll probably be doing some kind of keto diet (CKD or TKD) except with excess calories to make sure I gain muscle. Anyways, I hate to fall off the 5x5 bandwagon here, but my goal is to get that damn six-pack first so I can bulk with the 5x5 later. Thanks again to everyone who helped me out. You can be sure I'll back in a few months.
 
Good luck Siamesedream.

Madcow stated on here several times that his goal was not to get everyone training 5x5 but, rather, to open people's minds to alternatives to drugs and to the classic BB split and to show how the rest of the world trains outside bodybuilding.

This program has led to many people here becoming empowered in their own training and progressing to levels which many believed were only attainable with steroids. Not only that but also left us with the feeling that these are nowhere near personal limits.
 
Yeah good luck bro. It seems like a good idea to get lean then worry about muscle. See ya in a bit...

BTW you don't have to leave, just post up about what kind of lifting you're doing and we'll rip it aprt for you :) J/K
 
Madcow was against the idea when I suggested the same. I even suggested that it have its own forum and he nixed that too.

The problem with stickies is that hardly anyone looks at them. Madcow noticed that the thread got a surge in views everytime it went back up to the top and decided that it was better not being stuck at the top.

If it does die away then that'll be just because it's served its main purpose and we don't need it anymore. It is linked to in the sticky of training routines.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

big perm said:
On the wednesday workout......does anyone do their deads BEFORE their dropped weight in squats? If so, why?
It's not generally recommended to squat after deadlift. The squat is a more technical lift than the deadlift and squating while utterly knackered as you'll be in weeks3 and 4 is not recommended.

The original Starr 5x5 layout has OHP before the deads, too.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Blut Wump said:
It's not generally recommended to squat after deadlift. The squat is a more technical lift than the deadlift and squating while utterly knackered as you'll be in weeks3 and 4 is not recommended.

That's what I figured and it's the way I've done them, but after reading the thread -Deads and Squats on the same day- I questioned whether or not anyone running the Starr 5X5 was doing them this way.

Blut Wump said:
The original Starr 5x5 layout has OHP before the deads, too.

Interesting......have you done them this way and if so how did your OHP weight differ?

Thanks for the response bro.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

big perm said:
Interesting......have you done them this way and if so how did your OHP weight differ?

Thanks for the response bro.
No I haven't. I spotted it just a week or so ago and don't know why madcow had the OHP after deads. That, for me, was one of the worst parts of the Wednesday workout: doing deads and then trying to find energy to do some OHP while my back was telling me just to go home. Next time around, I'll be trying OHP before deads.

You're most welcome.
 
Hello there

I have been looking over this thread (all 46 pages of it) and I must say that I am impressed with the general concepts of this program. I am going to try this program in a few weeks but I have a problem,no bench press yet as im still setting up at home(although I do have squat stands,which allows me to squat).How would I go about substituting an exercise to replace the bench press?

If Madcow or anyone else with ideas for a bench substitute could reply it would be much appreciated.
 
Floor press might be a reasonable sub.

Some might suggest dips but I never really got into them and, unless you have something to suspend weights from, it's difficult to maintain a weight progression.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

blut wump said:
That, for me, was one of the worst parts of the Wednesday workout: doing deads and then trying to find energy to do some OHP while my back was telling me just to go home.

mc2's pretty thorough, I'm sure he had a reason... even though deads after squats seems slightly insane.. I'll stay with it even though my deadlift is close to zero. Maybe it's building fatigue, hit the heaviest exercises first?
 
Believe me, you don't want to be doing them the ther way around. Squats after deads would be asking for an injury.

If the Wednesday squats are a bit of a nuisance you could lower the weight on them. You could reasonably go as low as 75% of your Monday weight.

The last time I did 5x5, I fried my hips by doing heavy box-squats on Wednesday instead of light normal squats and the deads became very grualling. I'll not be doing that again.
 
Hi there been reading through all the info and thinking I may like to start this program. The dilema i have is that in 5 weeks time I am heading overseas for 2 weeks dont know if ill find much time for gym and was wondering if it would be wise to do the first 4 weeks of the program take 2 weeks off and then pick up where i left off??
 
It's not ideal but the timing is perfect if you have that enforced layoff. You'd just skip the intensity phase, since a two week layoff is enough to bring some deconditioning, and start the program afresh when you return.

You might be better to run four weeks of the Single Factor version, though, and rethink the situation when you return. Here's the SF version
http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=4497774&postcount=15

Take a look at Anotherbutters log for a real-world example of its use.
 
Thanks think i may just start the dual factor version then take my 2 weeks off and start fresh when I return. Looking forward to it.

Also was wondering i have a dodgy knee and think that machine squats on a smith machine are probably better for me at least until I build up strength in legs ( havent trained legs since knee operation over a year ago) would this still work? Everything else would be the same.
 
The general consensus is that Smith machine squats are one of the worst things for your knees. You should just reduce the weight and play with foot flare and stance width until you find a pain-free position. Always go fully down, don't stop at parallel and certainly not before parallel. Keep it tight at the bottom rather than relaxing there. Make sure you do sufficient warmups to ease the knee into the workout. Always stretch out your hamstrings and thighs after a workout.

If you can't squat well, for whatever reason, then definitely stick with the single factor version for a while. The dual factor just isn't appropriate until you are solid in the lifts, most especially the squat.
 
Hi there, only new to this board, but a big advocate of Bill Starr, and have read Only the Strongest ….. plenty of times.

Just wondering why only Bill’s 5x5 routine is ever mentioned….he talks plenty about changing it up, using 5,3, 10’s and numerous other things…yet these don’t get talked about. Most tend to just talk about changing to something different once 5x5 is no longer giving results.
 
Salv said:
Hi there, only new to this board, but a big advocate of Bill Starr, and have read Only the Strongest ….. plenty of times.

Just wondering why only Bill’s 5x5 routine is ever mentioned….he talks plenty about changing it up, using 5,3, 10’s and numerous other things…yet these don’t get talked about. Most tend to just talk about changing to something different once 5x5 is no longer giving results.
If I understand correctly, Madcow promotes this program as a way to get away from the nonsensical, Flex magazine type of stuff that leads to frustration for so many people. The sheer volume of the posts on this thread may make it seem that we 5x5'ers think that this is it and that nothing else matters any more.

That's not the case- this program, as you know, is fantastic but other programs and rep ranges appropriate to one's goals should be used as well. This program seems to serve the function of getting people on the right track in terms of setting up programs that properly regulate volume, intensity, frequency, workload and exercise selection.
 
I think the program set out here sounds great and I will be giving it a go. I was just pointing out that if one is a Bill Starr devotee, his routine suggestions start with the 5x5 and variations of ie. Enough variety that one could simply use Bill Starr routines forever. And so what surprises me is that people only ever talk about single factor 5x5 from Bill’s book, when there’s more to it than that.
 
Salv said:
I think the program set out here sounds great and I will be giving it a go. I was just pointing out that if one is a Bill Starr devotee, his routine suggestions start with the 5x5 and variations of ie. Enough variety that one could simply use Bill Starr routines forever. And so what surprises me is that people only ever talk about single factor 5x5 from Bill’s book, when there’s more to it than that.

No, we mainly talk about dual factor theory which is different from the single factor. Besides, look how much space this took up. Could you imagine if we talked about the whole book???

Also, MC2 didnt expect people to run this forever. He wanted to give HIT'ers a kick in the ass to think outside the box.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Update on new TOC (rough draft in link), backup site, and Practical Periodization

For those interested, this is kind of a preliminary on what the new and likely final TOC is going to look like. A bit better organized around training theory with more info in the actual TOC before one reaches the program links. I'll also be getting the Dual Factor Description edited a bit.

This site is where I'll likely backup everything here (in case the servers barf as I spent too damn long on this) and throw up a few other goodies as I'm able. I just need to get everything in order first. It's your plain vanilla black and white site so the low bandwidth afforded by geocities shouldn't get too cramped for people: http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1.

There is a rough draft of the new TOC there that links back to EF or the appropriate site as the topic dictates. This is a much better and clearer version and I'm hoping to leave something of a reference for people to refer to - at least until they start putting real training info in the mags.

In other news I had a conversation today with Glenn P. and he spoke for a bit about the upcomming release of Practical Periodization due out in early 2006. The way he described it was that a good subtitle would be "Training - Years 1-3." He said it will pick up from the beginners program where Starting Strength left off. It will cover the "how", "why", and "when" training is gradually altered over time as a lifter or athlete progresses. In a sense the progression might go from setting records 3x per week to 2x and 1x, then to 1x every 4 weeks, and 1x every 8 weeks. Obviously structure and workload will be covered in depth.

This is likely to be the book everyone has been waiting for. Personally, I'm really excited about it.

Also, I likely won't be posting with anywhere near the frequency I did in the past although I will still stop in. The goal was to help people out, try to change things a bit in the way of getting real training theory out there, and leave a useable reference. I think that's been accomplished with the TOC update and the backup site (which is frankly a lot easier to update than an internet thread where editing becomes really onerous - as I find new stuff, I'll put it there and then try to duplicate here or provide a link, the TOC here likely won't reflect this). It's certainly been great to see so many people here and all over the net getting great results, learning, and just generally enjoying their training and progression. One of the very few boards where "PR" and "Gained Xlbs" are commonplace.

Anyway, hope everyone is well and all the best.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Training Progression Over Time and The Use of Benchmarks

Posted this in another thread but it's an important distinction that has kind of been misinterpreted by a lot of people in thinking some of the 5x5 programs are 'static' and not snapshots of a dynamic progression that evolves with the lifter over time from initially setting records every week (even 2-3x for a beginner) and then later 1x per week, and beyond that more standard periodization is used to elicit progress every 4 or even 8 weeks.


Madcow2 said:
So a lot of this stems from a conversation with Glenn Pendlay about what he feels is really important but what a lot of people miss. Probably useful to add to your perspective on variations:

The variations are there simply due to experience level. What makes a novice grow won't work for an intermediate and likewise the same case for intermediate/advanced and advanced/elite. Training is a progression. And one can't address this by simply changing their routine all the time to keep their 'muscles confused'. This entails consistently driving the core lifts up using largely volume/intenisty/frequency/periodization/ and to a lesser degree targetted assistance work that addresses specific weaknesses in an individual. Basically, anything different will allow you to get better at it for a while (volume fans starting HIT or HIT fans starting volume or new exercises swapped around) but if the big lifts aren't moving up, you are just rotating crap and stagnating despite what might seem like a good progression. The big lifts are your benchmark so to speak - if you are rotating garbage and not progressing, they won't move and to a large degree you won't get any steady physique progress mid to long term.

So what is the progression? The idea behind training is to add weight to the bar as often as possible, generally 2x per week can work for a beginner (in some cases 3x for a bit), this trends down to 1x per week, and later every 4 weeks and then 8 weeks as periodization becomes more and more important. What might be the best method for a beginner simply won't work at all for someone more experienced and a beginner using a more experienced program than necessary will wind up with slower progression and in some cases no progression.

I had this conversation on a board the other day regarding Westside's methods. Bottom line, if Louie could go into the gym and train just the core PLs and consistently add even a little weight to the bar week to week consistently - he'd be loving it and it would result in massive gains over a 6 month training cycle. The bottom line is that he can't and this is where Westside's methods come from, making optimal use of limited resources. Novices don't hit the resource wall and until they do, they should be milking it for all it's worth and increasing their weights as often as they can.

The key takeaway is that training must change over time but you should always gear for optimal progress. Having benchmarks like the core lifts where increases result in tangible largescale increases in strength and hypertrophy over the body is the mentality to have and allows one to evaluate training effectiveness and progress over time periods.

Now not having a coach or enough good training experience to pull from, you have to kind of pick a 'cookie cutter' type template (think of it as a snapshot of a single point in the progression) that is an estimate of where you think you are at right now and see what happens. These are the 5x5 examples in my thread, basically a linear weekly model for novices (probably most of the people on this site since this is a whole different type of training than they are used to), I don't have anything for raw beginners yet, and the other is setup as an 'intro to periodization' so to speak that will work for someone at that point and not kill someone who isn't quite ready for it (i.e. they'll get less gains than optimal but most people still find the results infinitely better than what they were getting from their previous programs).

At this point it should be pretty obvious that I think the generic training plit template working a bodypart 1x per week with a shotgun array of exercises is pretty much absolute garbage to be using for the majority of the year. Consider also that most people don't have any inkling of the concepts that I've addressed here and in my thread, that this stuff is very simple and integral to training success yet nothing like it ever gets put in a BBing magazine, and this is the state of training today which is infinitely better than it was 10 years ago but still really really abysmal and horid.
 
Ok, I've read the first 10 pages of this thread, but I was hoping to get a simple answer since I'm too lazy to read another 38 pages right now... :)

Both the Pendlay routine and this routine seems very focused on building the Squats. Nothing wrong with that, and understandable since Pendlay works mostly with Olympic lifters and athletes, but for a bodybuilder whose weakness is chest and shoulders, with legs which just blow up looking at a squat rack, how would you modify this routine? Just go to 2-3 x 5 (1-2 x 3), then do a light 5 x 5 bench workout on Wednesday (which might be excessive volume given the MP 5 x 5)?

Also, some high rep work is beneficial for hypertrophy in terms of metabolic effects along with the progressive tension overload, so is it feasible to add in a set of 15-20 reps to - in this instance - Monday's chest and Wednesdays shoulder workout?

Thank you in advance.
 
I should add in that this is a pretty advanced power/bodybuilder weighing 250lbs at 5'10" and 10ish% bodyfat currently. He was a powerlifter in his younger days, WSB experience, and dabbling with some various routines over the years with periods of great progress. He is strong in deadlifts, chins and squats, but due to a past shoulder injury cannot do flat bench. Low incline bench is fine, though - but strength is mediocre in both this and overhead pressing exercises. Some rehab work of rotators and trigger point therapy of surrounding muscles have pretty much cured any pains or aches in this area, fortunately - so this shouldn't be limiting strength.
 
Question....Last Thursday I was due to start my 8th week of the 5X5, but my wife decided to have our baby two weeks early. Because of this I have taken a week off to care for her and the baby but am eager to get back into the swing of things.

I plan to return to the gym tomorrow (7 days later and 10 days since last lifting) How should I handle the return....should I jump right back into the 8th week weights and reps, or start over?
 
Blade_HST said:
Ok, I've read the first 10 pages of this thread, but I was hoping to get a simple answer since I'm too lazy to read another 38 pages right now... :)

Both the Pendlay routine and this routine seems very focused on building the Squats. Nothing wrong with that, and understandable since Pendlay works mostly with Olympic lifters and athletes, but for a bodybuilder whose weakness is chest and shoulders, with legs which just blow up looking at a squat rack, how would you modify this routine? Just go to 2-3 x 5 (1-2 x 3), then do a light 5 x 5 bench workout on Wednesday (which might be excessive volume given the MP 5 x 5)?

Also, some high rep work is beneficial for hypertrophy in terms of metabolic effects along with the progressive tension overload, so is it feasible to add in a set of 15-20 reps to - in this instance - Monday's chest and Wednesdays shoulder workout?

Thank you in advance.
This is a hipshot response so take it as such...

I'd guess that maybe this isn't the program for where you're at. Are you a competing BB'er who would be HURT in a show by more leg mass? If so then you might look elsewhere. However, if your whole upper body is lagging and you have no contests in the near future, this program ought to add mass all over. You could play with it from there, de-prioritizing legs down the road.

My belief is that the body best grows systemically and relying on squats as your core movemetn makes the other movements more effective. IOW, to most efficiently add mass to your upper body, you still gotta do all the core stuff like squats and deads.

Maybe you'll get a better answer from Madcow2.

Also, after a run of this you could most definitely transition into higher rep ranges - this program is meant to be a piece of your training pie, not the whole thing. It excels at adding strength to your core lifts which will carry over into higher rep ranges as well. But 5's are great for hypertrophy for many people.
 
big perm said:
Question....Last Thursday I was due to start my 8th week of the 5X5, but my wife decided to have our baby two weeks early. Because of this I have taken a week off to care for her and the baby but am eager to get back into the swing of things.

I plan to return to the gym tomorrow (7 days later and 10 days since last lifting) How should I handle the return....should I jump right back into the 8th week weights and reps, or start over?
Congrats on the new additon to the fam :).

I'd start the volume phase over (if another 5x5 run is what you were planning on) w/ your new PRs set for week 3. You've deloaded over the course of the week so IMO the next logical step is a new run.
 
My belief is that the body best grows systemically and relying on squats as your core movemetn makes the other movements more effective. IOW, to most efficiently add mass to your upper body, you still gotta do all the core stuff like squats and deads.

I'm sorry, but I'd have to disagree. There is just no evidence of such a systemic response, although there is an overall growth effect from the direct stress squats and deadlifts put on upper body muscle - this is not hormonal, though. This BB will be doing his deadlifts, the only question here - and I understand that the general consensus is not to mess with "the program[tm]" - is how to intelligently restructure some variables of the schedule to target weak points, given that one understands the underlying principles. Weak point targetting is an integral part of successful coaching IMO. I completely agree that squats should be a foundation of any training program, but in this specific instance, this is already a strong point, and we want to maintain squats while increasing focus to his horizontal and vertical pressing movements - something applicable to a football player or boxer even.

I guess I will do some experimentation with exchanging some DE bench work on the bench with the light squats (or front squats) on Wednesday, and probably reduce the 5 x 5 to 2-3 x 5 on Monday unless someone else has any suggestions or experiences.

Thank you for your input, though, it is appreciated and noted. :)
 
Blade_HST said:
I and I understand that the general consensus is not to mess with "the program[tm]"

Yeah but that's most of the people on THIS board who want to mess with it don't understand WHY they'd need to change it. Sounds to me like you do. I'd LOVE to see what happens when someone who has a clue adds stuff like DE work or bands or whatever.

Is this person or you gonna have a journal anywhere? I'd like to see what you two end up with. I haven't moved beyond the basics - full ROM, regular rep speed (for the most part) and no accomadating resistance.

Thank you for your input, though, it is appreciated and noted. :)
Well I don't think I helped much, but it's the thought that counts, right? :)
 
I guess that is up to him if he wants to do a journal, I don't have the time to post journals for all my clients. :) I'll let you know if he does, though - and also how it works out for him after the first 4 week phase.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Blade_HST said:
I'm sorry, but I'd have to disagree. There is just no evidence of such a systemic response, although there is an overall growth effect from the direct stress squats and deadlifts put on upper body muscle - this is not hormonal, though. This BB will be doing his deadlifts, the only question here - and I understand that the general consensus is not to mess with "the program[tm]" - is how to intelligently restructure some variables of the schedule to target weak points, given that one understands the underlying principles. Weak point targetting is an integral part of successful coaching IMO. I completely agree that squats should be a foundation of any training program, but in this specific instance, this is already a strong point, and we want to maintain squats while increasing focus to his horizontal and vertical pressing movements - something applicable to a football player or boxer even.

I guess I will do some experimentation with exchanging some DE bench work on the bench with the light squats (or front squats) on Wednesday, and probably reduce the 5 x 5 to 2-3 x 5 on Monday unless someone else has any suggestions or experiences.

Thank you for your input, though, it is appreciated and noted. :)

The consensus to 'not mess with the program' is because most people don't know what the hell they are doing even though they believe they do and have 20 years reading M&F. This way they don't end up in a 3 day split and turn it into one of their normal shitty programs and wonder why it didn't work well.

Whoever started that hormonal crap on squats and deads needs to be flailed. Supercompensation does not forced to be immediate and linear workout to workout and certainly not within a few hours so that and the 'training must be under 60 min or it's worthless' theory is just garbage.

Anyway, the generic template is for full body growth. Increasing the squat just does a good job of growing the entire body due to it's use of a high % of musculature - same with dead and to a degree all compound movements. So the body is a system, should be trained as such, but from a muscle structure standpoint not a hormonal one.

Basically, you can do what you want with the program. Aesthetics make it hard since you aren't just going for basic growth and already have someone who is overdeveloped from a squatting sense. I'd also venture that some might be overcoming a genetic issue (i.e. if he had fabulous chest/shoulder genetics any good training would likely work). You'll have to choose exercises and volume based upon what you know of him, obviously the key to this layout is periodization, a lot of workload on a few 'big lifts' and high frequency of stimulus which is integral. One thing I'd make sure he's working hard are barbell rows. Doing them dynamically. This is pretty key to growing the shoulder girdle in addition to the lats and more power in the lats etc... translates to more power in the bench so there should be some synergy.

Hope that helps.
 
Last edited:
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Along the lines of 'increasing vertical and horizontal pressing movements' and using the rows (performed at 90 degrees or as close to and done dynamically) you might also consider something like a power shrug and dynamic pulling in the vertical plane (i.e. dead or clean varient being vertical and row being horizontal). This might be especially useful if he hasn't done a lot of dynamic pulling or OLs before and the PS is a fairly low skill movement (just don't have him go heavy or work in low reps right away, ease into it). There's a whole writeup on the PS technique on the TOC and a more recent TOC here until I get things finalized and update the one on this thread: http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/table_of_contents_thread.htm

If you lower volume on the squats and don't really pound the dead too much, you should have plenty of capacity left over in a base case (i.e. it varies so much that you will have to make the call).

Hope all that helps and gives you some ideas.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

big perm said:
Question....Last Thursday I was due to start my 8th week of the 5X5, but my wife decided to have our baby two weeks early. Because of this I have taken a week off to care for her and the baby but am eager to get back into the swing of things.

I plan to return to the gym tomorrow (7 days later and 10 days since last lifting) How should I handle the return....should I jump right back into the 8th week weights and reps, or start over?

Maybe this gets to you in time, maybe not. Go by feel and what you want to do. Loading isn't really a concern with a break like that so if you want to do some heavy triples and hit them hard for 2-3 weeks go ahead. Go by feel and maybe start lighter this week if you have to.

If you'd rather start over, you can do that too. Personally, I really like lifting with triples and pushing them. So - - all up to you and a big congratulations to you and your family! Don't know if you've been a dad before but it's by far the best thing I've done in my life and it seems to keep getting better and better.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Thanks Guinness and Madcow.....I have decided to start over this week.

Again, thanks for the help.

p.s. Madcow...this is my first child and I had absolutely no idea how much of a joy he'd be...and he's only 6 days old! :)
 
It just keeps getting better and better. Really adds to your life in ways that can't be explained. Milk it for all it's worth because life doesn't get any better than that.
 
Thanks madcow2 - your comments and input are highly valued. We are definitely in agreement on everything you said. I already have him doing the PS, great exercise (I do it, too) :)
 
Blade_HST said:
Thanks madcow2 - your comments and input are highly valued. We are definitely in agreement on everything you said. I already have him doing the PS, great exercise (I do it, too) :)
Sure, I wish I could give you something specific but you have the base knowledge so it's really a question of optimization for a certain individual (exercises, weak points, workload, etc...). Not much anyone can do but you, him, and anyone else that has monitored his training.

Best of luck and keep us updated on how it's working out.

Whoops - I missed your 15-20 rep set question. To be honest, unless the weight is very light that's probably going to add up and you'll need to balance and account of it. Do the workload calc and figure out the difference. 5x5 @ 300 = 7500, 1x20 @ 200 = 4000, even 1x20 @ 150 it's still 3000. That's a 53% increase laying one of those sets on top. If you are using say slight incline bench 2x per week at 1x5 and 5x5 plus some overhead work at 5x5, laying on two of those 15-20rep sets is going to be impactful. Not saying you can't do it or it won't work or whatever but that you need to think about it carefully unless the weight is very low to where it's a breeze and you wouldn't even include it in a workload calc.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

5x5 What's Next...

So this was an interesting thread that came up: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=435585

I cut/pasted a few things below that might help some people get their arms around concepts of systematic progression in training, cookie cutter programs, and goal.

GlennPendlay said:
there seem to be a lot of people who do the style of training we usually can "5 by 5" for a while, then wonder "whats next".

one general comment i would make, is that if this style of training has been successfull for you, why change it? and by style of training, im not talking about one specific program, but the general style of doing whole body exercises, training the whole body or at least most of the body in each workout, and doing multiple sets not taken to failure.

i do, however, understand the mental side... you do the same thing over and over and you want something different. there are lots of ways you can change things without totally changing to a "new" program. switching back and forth between widely differing types of training isnt that good of an idea... small and systematic changes over time in what you are doing however IS a good idea.

for instance... say youve been squatting 3 times a week. how about changing one of the workouts to front squat, hell you could change 2 of the workouts to front squat. i hate leg presses, but if you really wanted to, you could squat on monday, front squat on wednesday, and leg press on friday!!! if youve been doing only rows for back, change one or two of the workouts to chinups... substitute stiff legged deadlifts for deadlifts, change mondays workout to 3 sets of 8 for a month, change fridays squat or bench workout to 5 singles, etc, etc, etc.

ive even seen people who after a while on a 3 day a week program, switched to a 4 day split, doing squats and pressing exercises on monday and thursday, back and pulling exercises on wed and saturday. i dont see this as retreating from the principles of the 5 by 5 at all. you are STILL working your whole body, or very nearly so, every training day. squats work the back, they work everything... and deadlifts or stiff legged deadlifts work the legs, not as much as squats, but they still work them. this is in fact the favored program of mike stone, probably the best ex phys guy on the planet and former head of sports science at the olympic training center.

the main thing is to go about it in a systematic way.

one of my lifters, josh wells, who made the junior world team in 2004 in weightlifting, and can jerk close to 400lbs weighing around 180lbs as a teenager, did this program about a year ago in his "off season" to try to gain some general strength.

monday, squats (5 sets of 3), push presses (3 sets of 5) then glute ham raises or reverse hypers

wednesday, snatch pulls (5 sets of 2), powercleans (5 sets of 2), chinups (5 sets of 10 with extra weight, hanging from a 2" bar)

thursday, front squats (6 sets of 2), push jerks (5 sets of 2), military press (3 sets of 5), then glute ham raises or reverse hypers.

saturday, powersnatches (5 sets of 2), clean pulls (5 sets of 5), barbell rows, (5 sets of 5)

obviously this is geared toward olympic weightlifting, and not really what most of you would be doing. im not sure many here have that much interest in doing so many snatch and clean pulls. and hes using lower reps, because of course for him strength is a bigger deal than size, but even his reps changed over time, sometimes were higher, sometimes lower. this is just as representative of the 5 by 5 training style as the simpler 3 day programs... because we did it systematically, sets across instead of failure, gradually moving the weights up, gradually adding then subtracting volume of training to force the body to adapt


the important thing is to think thru the changes, dont make too many at one time, but make them slowly and steadily.

the real value of the "5 by 5" style of training isnt that it can or will add a certain amount of muscle or strength in an 8 week cycle. the real value is that it is a framework that when used right can work for years, slowly changing and morphing along the way to fit itself to your particular goals, and making for steady progress for 3, 4, or more years. it is more than anything, a mindset. a mindset of writing your workouts down, being systematic, knowing what you are going to do before you go to the gym, having a plan, and knowing that 5lbs a month is 60lbs a year and 180lbs in 3 years.

and more than that it is a mindset of THINKING, thinking about training, and rejecting the latest and greatest thing that forces many, even most, to run from one program to the next, changing things totally every time they get bored or have a bad workout. by recording everything, thinking a lot, planning, making small changes instead of wholesale ones, going back and looking at your workout log and looking at the last month, 6 months, year, etc, and planning the next month... within a year or two you know more about your body and what to do than me or anyone else could ever tell you.

now... last comment. i have, in a big drawer, a record of every single workout i have ever done, from the time i was 15 back in 1975 to my last month of competitive training in 2003. every single one. i also have descriptions and comments, tables in the back of the logs that showed weight gain and strength gain on a yearly basis, monthly, etc. comments on what happened to weight/strength when i changed exercises, changed reps, etc. there is very little i dont know about how my body responded, what worked and what didnt, etc. you all should do the same thing. approach training like a scientist working an experiment.

Madcow2 said:
Goals determine the path. Experience/Current Condition determines what exactly you need to do next and in the near future on that path.

A cookie cutter program is just a point - if one is lucky it's somewhere near his path and at least moves him forward by some margin. Training has to evolve with the lifter and move him consistently forward on the path toward his goals.

Most cookie cutters are designed to be "accessible" from a workload perspective so to speak and not kill anyone. They will always be suboptimal in some way (i.e. closer to path = better and forward = better) but for this reason they will never really carry one for very long toward the goal because a point by its nature is static and a lifter is constantly evolving and hopefully moving forward (which tends to be exceedingly rare in commercial gyms). Think of a lot of points clustered around the beginner/new-intermediate area, any choice for a beginner will move him forward even if the choice is in left field somewhere, for an intermediate it's necessary to be more discerning as many points don't allow progression (or you go to the anabolic board and increase the dosage until you start gaining from any old thing again). For someone deep in the intermediate phase there are much fewer cookie cutters that will move him forward. For an advanced lifter, there's generally nothing there.

So, better than people throwing out more cookie cutters maybe clarify the goal and try to evaluate how your training has changed or progressed over time and most recently, where you've been most successful (i.e. moving at a fast rate toward your goal) and what exactly you would like to change (optimally the purpose behind which should be to move even faster toward that goal).

Keep in mind, the goal needn't be big lifts, strength, athletics, or a lot of muscle. It might be a healthy, balanced activity. It might just be fun in which case that's a tougher path because you have to determine what you 'like' to do and what one 'likes' tends to change as people get bored very quickly and want to swap stuff around.

Madcow2 said:
but at what point does squating 3X a week become counter productive..keep in mind my goal is not necessary for strenght (it is a plus) but for the defined, muscular hard look most bbers posses

I don't know that it does. The squat tends to drive full body gains and as long as you are doing exercises besides the squat it's a no brainer. The main issue is that people are coming from a BBing reference of a bodypart 1x per week and despite the overwhelming popularity this was based on some horrendously wrong assumptions and ignorance about muscles needing a week to recover irregardless of what was done and that it was counter productive to train them before the point of full recovery again. Hell, IMO the whole idea of thinking and arranging training in terms of "working" individual muscles is a fairly bad idea.

Hell, some people squat more often and for a lot more volume over a period. Remember that workload over a period is a function of volume and frequency - frequency distributes volume so whether you do all the work 1x per week (not recommended or a good idea) or over 3 sessions, workload is the same. Look at OL's squatting backsquatting and frontsquatting mutliple times per week while every snatch and clean involves a recovery from the squat position. Arguably that might mean legs being trained 12x per week or some such.

Like I said though, the "5x5" program you used is still a data point. If it worked well for you, then it is only because it is on your 'path' and moved you 'forward' at a faster rate than what you've been doing. This is just good training. Your training will have to evolve and change as you progress, but that doesn't mean that you shouldn't take a good look at that program and understand exactly why it worked (focus on increasing big lifts to drive muscle gains not on 'working a certain muscle', proper use of frequency, management of fatigue, progressive overload, appropriate volume for you at this point in time). In reality the '5x5' here is just a snapshot of what an intro to periodization program might look like. The version a beginner would start with is not structed like that, the version that might be optimal for someone further down the road will be changed too. Lots of alterations in between those 3 points.

As for a suggestion on what else to do, a lot of people have had success running 2 of these back to back. This is due to not having to feel their way, having very relevant maxes, and being able to push a lot harder and more confidently since they aren't worried about blowing the program with bad weight selection. This lets them load a lot harder and get into true overreaching. After that, if you are a BBer, maybe try something along the HST lines. Some higher rep work will really kick off major hypertrophy after building a big strength foundation (this is why training in different rep ranges in different periods is optimal).

Biggest suggestion is to understand why something works and what consitutes good training and programing. That way people don't go back to a 3 day split, training a muscle 1x per week all the time and wonder why it doesn't work very well. When Practical Periodization comes out (early 2006), it will probably be a good book to pickup for you as it should cover all of this in and much much more in detail.

EDIT - okay as I copied the quote in a read the 'muscular hard look that a bber posesses'. This is a combination of muscle and diet. Muscle is taken care of by training, you want the best results for your effort. Diet takes care of that balance of fat to muscle or 'that hard look' in contrast to big and soft.

To further illustrate this look at the pics here of Dave Gulledge dieting down. Read through the thread and see his responses to questions if you like. Inclusing the one from a BBer about how much time he spends doing 'bbing' exercises so he can look like that: http://www.midwestbarbell.com/totalelite/index.php?showtopic=1110
 
These were posted by Fortified Iron on his site. I haven't more than glanced at them but they'd probably do people a lot of good to read judging by what I saw.

FortifiedIron said:
 
Madcow2 said:
These were posted by Fortified Iron on his site. I haven't more than glanced at them but they'd probably do people a lot of good to read judging by what I saw.



Say I feel like I'd like to go back on the 5x5 again but I have an injured back that makes it impossible for me to do bent-over rowing movements and, especially, deadlifting. What would be the best sort of program for me to adapt. Also, I am in a caloric deficit right now and doing cardio so muscle gain is extremely hard if not impossible for me right now, but it seems I have the ability to gain strength still little by little by little.
 
siamesedream said:
Say I feel like I'd like to go back on the 5x5 again but I have an injured back that makes it impossible for me to do bent-over rowing movements and, especially, deadlifting. What would be the best sort of program for me to adapt. Also, I am in a caloric deficit right now and doing cardio so muscle gain is extremely hard if not impossible for me right now, but it seems I have the ability to gain strength still little by little by little.
Well, I'd be most worried about back and getting it healed first. Bottom line, if you are injured you do what you can. If a machine can help, use it - results will suffer but shit, you are injured so it's better than just laying there. Hopefully you can still squat - to be honest if your back is hurt badly maybe you shouldn't.

I don't know what to tell you. You work around stuff and don't push too hard. 1st priority is healing and that doesn't go well with a program that's really designed to push you past your limits.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

ok, so you say 2x/wk training during the deloading is more than likely better for most people

i will be incorporating that frequency at wk 5.
but for wks 6-9, would you recommend 3x/wk, or keep it at 2 or pehaps ramp it up to 3 after 2-3 wks at 2x/wk?
 
Last edited:
2x per week is a totally separate schedule. Just keep the weight constant for week 5, then increase week to week for a few weeks (generally 2-3). This serves more to deload properly. The 3x per week option is kind of a double barrell with 2 sets of PRs and you have to make sure you recover adequately in the middle. People new to this can't be guaranteed of pulling it off correctly (which can screwup your previous work) so the 2x option is a safer bet with lower workload and not an overbearing focus on record triple attempts back to back.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
2x per week is a totally separate schedule. Just keep the weight constant for week 5, then increase week to week for a few weeks (generally 2-3). This serves more to deload properly. The 3x per week option is kind of a double barrell with 2 sets of PRs and you have to make sure you recover adequately in the middle. People new to this can't be guaranteed of pulling it off correctly (which can screwup your previous work) so the 2x option is a safer bet with lower workload and not an overbearing focus on record triple attempts back to back.

ok
i think i will stay at 2x/wk for wks 5-9 (while moving weights up gradually), until i get a hang for things, maybe ill try 3x wk on second or third go-round
thanks for your answer

so 2x wk would be something youd reccomend for someone new to this training, for the deloading/intensity weeks ?
 
2x/wk only for weeks 7 or 8. You'll start to feel like you aren't going to the gym enough even though your strength will be climbing as you deload.

There'll come a point when either you can't keep bumping the weight and still attain all nine reps or you'll feel the urge to get back to week one and have the extra volume. It is possible to run hybrids but it'd probably be a mistake to do that on your first run.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

blut wump said:
2x/wk only for weeks 7 or 8. You'll start to feel like you aren't going to the gym enough even though your strength will be climbing as you deload.

There'll come a point when either you can't keep bumping the weight and still attain all nine reps or you'll feel the urge to get back to week one and have the extra volume. It is possible to run hybrids but it'd probably be a mistake to do that on your first run.

ok, now im confused
so wks 1-4 volume phas, 3x/wk
wks - 5 deload - 2x/wk

now youre saying only wks 7 and 8 2x/wk
what about weeks 6 and 9 then ?
thansk for your previous repsonse
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

My first time through the 5X5 I did the 2X per week variation and felt as if I needed more....kind of like blut described above.

My 2nd time through I did the 3X variation and wished I had done it that way my first time through....I just had to make sure I was in tune with my body and ready to take an extra day of rest as needed.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

rjl296 said:
ok, now im confused
so wks 1-4 volume phas, 3x/wk
wks - 5 deload - 2x/wk

now youre saying only wks 7 and 8 2x/wk
what about weeks 6 and 9 then ?
thansk for your previous repsonse
Sorry, I meant until week 7 or 8. The 2x per week version would typically be cut short at week 7 or 8 rather than going all the way out to week 9. You could even terminate it after week 6 if you felt like getting back into the volume phase a shade earlier but week 7 is a good target.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

blut wump said:
Sorry, I meant until week 7 or 8. The 2x per week version would typically be cut short at week 7 or 8 rather than going all the way out to week 9. You could even terminate it after week 6 if you felt like getting back into the volume phase a shade earlier but week 7 is a good target.

ahh ok
thak
so its like 4:1:1-3 then

thanks orb
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

FYI:

I updated the periodized 5x5 Description on my geocities site, much better charts and graphs. I also included a sample layout. An excel file is in the works. The linear program will get the same treatment and I'll eventually throw something in there for beginners.

I'm going to update the description here as best I can and then the TOC on the first post within the week hopefully.

New Periodized 5x5:
http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Periodized_5x5.htm
Sample Template: http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Periodized_5x5_Template.htm

Site News/Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/index.htm
Updated Table of Contents: http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/table_of_contents_thread.htm
 
Thanks. The only bummer is that even the periodized/df program is fairly simple to setup but people aren't used to selecting weights or managing anything beyond exercise selection and you wind up with a lot of uncertainty and 1000 questions. So by the time you make a comprehensive piece, you wind up with 4 pages making it look like it's really hard or complicated. It's really a no brainer, but it seems people do better with more information rather than less. I might add a summary at the top or something.
 
Well that's irritating - apparently my Geocities site exceeded bandwidth limitation this morning. Considering it's all text and mostly links that must be a damn anemic limit. If I have to upgrade it, I'll be pissed. How dumb is that.
 
Yeah it came back up. The issue is that the entire multi-page interactive spreadsheet is around 115kb but cut/pasting just a part of it containing some hard coded numbers and formatting makes for a 350kb html document. So, this can take down the site real fast with enough views. I'll probably host the docs somewhere else so that even if people can't download the spreadsheets or files, they can still read all the info. For now though the template is down.
 
Madcow, I think I'm gonna order beyond Bodybuilding and maybe a few other books after check them out a little more. Any other books off any of the sites you recomend that have routines layed out that I can follow till i learn to set up a personailzed routine myself? Thanks.
 
Well most of the books that I would recommend are designed to teach people proper program design more than provide a cookie cutter to follow. I mean, a cookie cutter is shit - the only way it's going to be optimal is if you just happen to fit the profile at that point in time. Obviously nobody builds cookie cutters for more advanced people so as you progress cookie cutters are going to get worse and worse.

Good books to check out if you are so inclined:
Science and Practice of Strength Training
Super Training
Starting Strength
Practical Periodization (when it comes out - this will probably be the thing you are really looking for)
Managing the Training of Weightlifters
A System of Multi Year Training in Weightlifting
Fundmentals of Special Strength Training in Sport
 
madcow2, this is just out of pure curiosity. Suppose someone never consulted any sort of professional or any other weightlifter and simply bought a weight set and made up some horrible program with horrible volume, workload, intensity, and frequency and went on overtraining themselves for years showing little to no gains and, naturally, losses over time. Say someone introduced this person to proper training philosophy having to do with periodization, volume, compound lifts, etc. and they realized they've been doing everything wrong. If this person took 2 weeks off to get their body to recover from their horrible program and started up on an actually beneficial training program, would they show the same gains as they would have had they never had started their own horrible routine?

Basically, I'm just curious if someone could ever screw their body up so much through improper training that they become an ultra hard-gainer for their entire life or something.
 
Likely they'll at least sacrifice those nice neural gains that beginner trainers get that really serve to drive a ton of hypertrophy and adaptation. This is why starting with proper lifting is such a huge bonus and why it should be blatantly obvious that neural gains can and do translate to hypertrophy with standard non-100% neural training even in more advanced lifters.

As far as long term effects, not sure it's ever been studied. You can get some pretty bad stuff going on if you work hard enough at it but you'd really have to work. Heavy true overtraining is blatantly obvious - it's like saying "what if a guy just kept smashing his head with a concrete block". People are dumb but not that dumb and it would take a very motivated person to keep at it. The CNS is powerful though, it can even overcome idocy, his ability to do work and exert effort would be compromised further and further to allow for survival. Maybe that's sleeping 20 hours a day, who knows. This is why slave owners tended to treat their slaves decently even if only out of pure self interest, once capcity starts dropping it's more economic to feed and rest them then have a bunch of zombies out there in the fields. I guess a concentration camp is the other extreme although I have no familiarity with that. Who knows though, maybe if you do it long enough there can be permanent damage or inhibition or something. It's an interesting question.
 
Single Factor Questions:

First off, I'm up to page 22 or so of this AWESOME thread so if my questions have been asked & answered, I apologize.

1) What is a "novice"? I think Glenn P. said you need multiple years of quality training before you become an intermediate lifter. I'm nearing 30, lifted w/ crappy results for a few years in my 20s and have spent the past year getting back into it . .. just doing your typical BB'ing routine. I've recently been enlightened by 5x5, Glenn, Madcow, etc. I think I"m a novice so I"m doing SF . . . but I don't need to "learn" how to do the basics, etc. Should I just shut up and keep doing SF? I guess the downside to going to DF too early is it's more than you really need. But at the same time, it seems like DF is a superior training program/theory . . . so why not start there?

2) On Wednesday's lifts (light day), I understand you pyramid the first 3 sets, and then stay there and do either one or two add'l sets. Are you supposed to shoot for PRs each week on the deads and inclines (I do militaries)?

3) If you start to feel serious fatigue while doing the SF version, should you take a deload week or what? Glenn P. mentioned you should make small adjustments in your program to keep progress going . . . so if you're feeling really beat down after a while, should you follow Glenn's advice and tweak some variables (but keep the basic SF program) or should you deload for a week?

4) [tied into 3d question] How do you know when it's time to finally make the jump to DF?

Thanks guys! Looking forward to your responses.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Protobuilder said:
Single Factor Questions:

First off, I'm up to page 22 or so of this AWESOME thread so if my questions have been asked & answered, I apologize.

1) What is a "novice"? I think Glenn P. said you need multiple years of quality training before you become an intermediate lifter. I'm nearing 30, lifted w/ crappy results for a few years in my 20s and have spent the past year getting back into it . .. just doing your typical BB'ing routine. I've recently been enlightened by 5x5, Glenn, Madcow, etc. I think I"m a novice so I"m doing SF . . . but I don't need to "learn" how to do the basics, etc. Should I just shut up and keep doing SF? I guess the downside to going to DF too early is it's more than you really need. But at the same time, it seems like DF is a superior training program/theory . . . so why not start there?

2) On Wednesday's lifts (light day), I understand you pyramid the first 3 sets, and then stay there and do either one or two add'l sets. Are you supposed to shoot for PRs each week on the deads and inclines (I do militaries)?

3) If you start to feel serious fatigue while doing the SF version, should you take a deload week or what? Glenn P. mentioned you should make small adjustments in your program to keep progress going . . . so if you're feeling really beat down after a while, should you follow Glenn's advice and tweak some variables (but keep the basic SF program) or should you deload for a week?

4) [tied into 3d question] How do you know when it's time to finally make the jump to DF?

Thanks guys! Looking forward to your responses.

1) I think Glenn and Mark have been calling an advanced lifter, one who requires some type of more formal periodization to make optimal progress. I think that's 1-2 years under their training but that's not BBing bullshit training and most guys on this site even with 4-5 years of lifting don't require that. What I called Novice for the purposes of this program was someone who doesn't require periodization - I'll probably readjust and call this intermediate since too many raw beginners are thinking that the linear option is a good beginner program (i.e. beginner is different from novice to me but whatever - symantics).

2) That for the squats, the deads and inclines are run similar to the Monday workout in the perscribed sets/reps. Just incriment up each week.

3) If your lifts keep increasing keep going (i.e. first symptom of overreaching is decreased performance so assuming you are working hard and pushing real PRs - you would begin to struggle and fail when encountering this). That said, maybe there's another problem with you so pay attention to your body. Get sleep, eat, use your brain. When progress stops i.e. you aren't getting any more reps and can't increase the weight (i.e. if you don't get all your sets/reps you hold weight constant) then maybe look at changing. Also, if it's just one lift and you other big ones keep climbing (like squats and some others) I'd just mess with the one lift. It's when the majority go that you have to do something to the entire program.

4) One of the changes you make is to reset back a few weeks and work up again (maybe volume is changed or rep range or some different exercises included which should not be done in the BBer fashion of shotgunning whatever but chosen strategically to address potential weak points or whatever). So in working up you have some lighter weeks to recover and then hopefully a series of PRs for weeks at a time. Eventually this 'series of PRs' gets pretty darned short and this stuff doesn't work so well (and if it is still working keep pushing). After a lot of changes and resets and other stuff you wind up with what is essentially a dirty periodizzation anyway (i.e. all the resets and just an incriment or maybe 2 of progress). At that point, having exhausted your options, you'd migrate to something not based on 1x per week PRs. It's about efficiency of progression. If you can get even 3 PR increases after 4 build up weeks, let's say at 2% per week, that's over 6% (it's compounded). That's still a lot better than 2-5% ever 4-8 weeks. Through time PR frequency decreases and workload increases.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Madcow2 said:
4) One of the changes you make is to reset back a few weeks and work up again (maybe volume is changed or rep range or some different exercises included which should not be done in the BBer fashion of shotgunning whatever but chosen strategically to address potential weak points or whatever). So in working up you have some lighter weeks to recover and then hopefully a series of PRs for weeks at a time.

So you would do some ramping up then. That's what I was wondering about. I didn't say it very clearly, but I was wondering how pushing near max Deadlifts each week, for example, could be very productive, considering that that's how I've been training for the past year w/ very little progress. LoL I mean, from what I understand, you shouldn't expect much progress if week after week you just keep working w/ near maximal weights, hoping that this will be the week when you can finally add 5 pounds and get your reps. LoL To break the barrier, you've got to come down in weight some and build back up, breaking past your old PR.

Just making sure I've got it -- you push your Wed. lifts each week and if progress stalls, you come down, build back up for several weeks, and then try to push PRs for as many weeks as you can. Repeat as necessary (and maybe even tweak some variables on the lift that you're struggling with). Right?
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Protobuilder said:
So you would do some ramping up then. That's what I was wondering about. I didn't say it very clearly, but I was wondering how pushing near max Deadlifts each week, for example, could be very productive, considering that that's how I've been training for the past year w/ very little progress. LoL I mean, from what I understand, you shouldn't expect much progress if week after week you just keep working w/ near maximal weights, hoping that this will be the week when you can finally add 5 pounds and get your reps. LoL To break the barrier, you've got to come down in weight some and build back up, breaking past your old PR.

Just making sure I've got it -- you push your Wed. lifts each week and if progress stalls, you come down, build back up for several weeks, and then try to push PRs for as many weeks as you can. Repeat as necessary (and maybe even tweak some variables on the lift that you're struggling with). Right?

Well a newer lifter should get progress for a number of weeks at a time. anotherbutters I think had a 12 week run before stalling some. That's a nice period of PRs (not sure how long he ramped but probably 8 weeks in PR territory straight). The deadlift will also be driven by a lot of your other lifts, a bigger squat is a good way to get a bigger pull. And a bigger pull might well help the squat.

Just plan it out and see where it takes you. These were also pretty cool I though for a cheap solution to work with precise poundages. Particularly useful when you have lower lifts and 5lbs is a big percentage (i.e. you have to do 200x5 to have 5lbs increases be 2.5%). http://davedraper.com/forum/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/126913/Main/126754/
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

I don't know if this is useful or not to anyone but I wrote it on another board when we were discussing workload. It covers a lot of things on how workload integrates with frequency and how progression might change over time i.e. new progression becomes less and less frequent and workload increases.

Madcow2 said:
I think one thing most people fail to realize about frequency is that it is a separate variable from volume. As an aside the 3 primary variables in program design being frequency, volume, and intensity as measured by % of your 1RM for a given lift (i.e. weight on the bar). Volume and intensity over a period or session combine to equal workload with calculated tonnage in core lifts being helpful to track in many cases. A good piece for some definitions is here: http://www.qwa.org/articles/tmethod.asp

Anyway, frequency serves to distribute volume or workload over a period of time. Take a lifter who handles 10 sets of legs 1x per week. What most people do when they try to increase frequency is come in and do the same thing 2x per week. Now we have 20 sets per week or a 100% immediate increase in workload - likely not going to happen if things were setup even remotely close beforehand. Over time, this lifter might certainly be able to handle the increase but not 100% at once or even close to it. The correct way to use frequency is to distribute the original 10 sets i.e. perform 5 sets 2x per week. This works a lot better and frequency is really important to increasing weight on the bar and getting better at lifts. Actually this lifter will probably find very quickly that he can rachet up the workload much better with this distribution rather than doing it all on 1 day.

You don't get accustomed to a movement very well doing it once ever 7 days. You don't need to do it every day 2x per day (although in a more technique based lift like the snatch or clean higher frequency is very helpful) but 1x ever 7 days or more is pretty bad and the whole overtraining thing has a lot more to do with the CNS that muscular recovery and aggregate workload over a period is a better way to guage CNS impact than frequency in isolation as overtraining is systemic accumulated fatigue on the CNS (i.e. what is stimulative over 4 weeks might drop someone in their tracks if done for 8 weeks without rest).

To illustrate this better a lot of guys who use 5x5 style programs based on Starr's or Pendlay's stuff squat 3x per week. Even raw beginners, even elite lifters. How is this done, most people think the frequency is impossible. Well, you walk everyday many times without problems so frequency alone is not the issue. It's the combination of volume and intensity (or workload) over a period. Frequency merely distributes this workload. For a beginner, workload is low, and they will set new records possibly 2x per week. For an intermediate workload is increased and they might add weight to the bar weekly or thereabouts. For an advanced lifter workload will be higher still and new records set every 4-8 weeks.

Something like this:

Beginner: 3x5 performed 3x per week. 1 day is light. Weights are ramped to a top set i.e. 100, 115, 130. New records 2x per week on top set.

Intermediate: 5x5 performed 3x per week. Heavy/Light/Medium. Weights are ramped to a top set similar to first. New records set weekly on top set of 5.

Advanced: Periodized to allow for higher workload. 5x5 performed 3x per week. 2 Heavy and 1 Medium, Weights are constant set weight i.e. 315x5x5. This might be dropped to 2x per week with 1 heavy day and reps of 3x3 after the initial period (i.e. loading and deloading). New records every 4-8 weeks.

Thinking about tonnage in the core lifts as a proxy for workload. An intermediate and advanced lifter with exactly the same max lifts (rare) might have the intermediate using 30,000 lbs weekly or enough so that fatigue never really overtakes him and he can set new records weekly on a linear basis. The loading period for the advanced lifter might have 50,000 lbs per week - and he will likely fatigue from this in a few weeks and require a period of lower workload (volume lowered, frequency lowered, but intensity or weight on the bar can still be kept high - lots of ways to handle this but workload drops). Maybe workload is 20000lbs at this point. A frequent way people might do this is 3:1 ratio. So 50K loading and 20K deload in this example (which is pretty random by the way, don't go extrapolating all kinds of crap from it). What's the one thing you notice though, over 4 weeks you have 170K in workload (50K x 3 weeks + 20K x 1 week) vs. the linear 120K (30K x 4 weeks). Much higher average workload - how is this possible. Dual factor model or fitness/fatigue. Fitness and fatigue are separate and acrue and disipate at different rates. Fatigue can be disipated in 1/3rd the time of fitness i.e. you can handle a lot more work over a limited period (with a short period of rest) than you can running indefinitely without limit. This is why some people here might have gotten great results doing a ton of work over a few weeks and than as fatigue accrued it burned them out. If you want to better understand the dual factor model and how this is handled a good read is this: http://www.higher-faster-sports.com/PlannedOvertraining.html

So anyway, this is probably way beyond what a lot of guys on here are doing. That said, this is pretty much how training is handled around the world in elite strength and athletics. There is more to training that picking some exercises, spreading them out in a 3 day split, training a lift 1x a week, and with no other thought or organization, going in, working hard, and hoping to get bigger or stronger for your efforts. This might work decently enough at the beginner level but optimality and organization plays a far bigger role further out and even for the beginner, getting this right will make a big, very noticable difference.

So - back to the original point. Anyone can handle whatever frequency they choose. It's a matter of workload over a period and the conditioning of the athelete. Anyone can squat 3x per week just as anyone can walk every day, you just can't do 10 sets of 10 to failure or some garbage like that or increase workload 300% instantly to try it. Same with walking every day, you can't do maximum sprints for hours every day and you can't take a couch potatoe and expect him to walk 15 miles without some issues.

I hope that helps illustrate some things as this is a pretty good thread and I imagine we are touching on stuff that most people on this board either never considered or never realized were part of training. Keep in mind, the most important thing is adding weight to the bar and getting your lifts up. Now, how to best go about that for a given lifter at a given point in time - now that's programing and training, suffice to say you want to make the fastest progression possible and workload is a factor in this process.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Protobuilder said:
1) ... But at the same time, it seems like DF is a superior training program/theory ...
That's what I thought when I first read about it, which is why I started out on the DF, even though I'd been lifting less than a year. I don't think I knew about the SF until a while later, or if I did, I considered it inferior. Now I realise they're both great programs, just suited to different points in someone's lifting career. SF will always be quicker whilst you can get away with those kinds of gains. When you can't, DF becomes necessary. I don't like categorising people into novice, beginner, intermediate, etc, because people attach emotions to them. Nobody with a year or two under their belt will think of themselves as a beginner. Ignore the names - if you can gain on the SF, then milk it for all it's worth.

Protobuilder said:
3) If you start to feel serious fatigue while doing the SF version, should you take a deload week or what? Glenn P. mentioned you should make small adjustments in your program to keep progress going . . . so if you're feeling really beat down after a while, should you follow Glenn's advice and tweak some variables (but keep the basic SF program) or should you deload for a week?
madcow already answered this, but I'll throw in my .02 cents. Deloading should happen when your lifts stall. If you're feeling fatigued, yet your lifts are still going up, then keep going! That feeling can't be overreaching, otherwise the lifts would have stalled. I like the idea of dropping back a few weeks and ramping up again when you stall as it's self-regulating. Hopefully the drop in intensity will be enough for a deload.

Protobuilder said:
4) [tied into 3d question] How do you know when it's time to finally make the jump to DF?
That's the bit I liked. If you keep going back a few weeks to ramp up again, each time changing something such as the number of heavy sets, you'll end up sometimes ramping up with more volume than others, so you'll eventually be doing DF without making a conscious jump to it.

Protobuilder said:
I mean, from what I understand, you shouldn't expect much progress if week after week you just keep working w/ near maximal weights, hoping that this will be the week when you can finally add 5 pounds and get your reps.
I didn't appreciate until recently that you can still get stronger using sub-maximal weights, so long as the progression is there. Hitting the same maximal weight week after week doesn't give you anything new to adapt to, but dropping down and increasing the weight back up again does.

Here's my progress chart from a few weeks ago:

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5431516&postcount=265

I hit PRs around weeks 3-4 and stalled after setting new squat and bench PRs in week 14, so about 11 weeks progress. I'm currently on week 18, but the last 3 weeks I've been nursing a bad back :( Here's the beginning if you're intrested:

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=413888
 
Madcow, how exactly can one judge how much workload they can actually handle without overtraining themselves? As I've stated before, I can't do an already brilliantly-designed program like the 5x5 right now since I have a fairly serious back injury which will plague me for at least 6 more months or so (according to the docs). I've designed a program for myself utilizing exercises like one-legged squats, weighted push-ups, weighted dips, weighted pullups, weighted diamond push-ups, etc. and have been trying very hard to fine-tune it using your geocities webpage as a resource to help me in my design. Well, this week, I was forced to deload by decreasing frequency to 2x a week and dropping the volume since I fried a few of my muscles.

Since I'm deloading, it's no biggie and, as I've learned, it's beneficial to have planned overload and planned deload periods. However, I've been lifting for less than a year and also know that dual-factor training is not something necessary for myself yet, or at least it shouldn't be part of my plan at the moment. Therefore, how exactly can I guage what sort of workload I can handle in order to have a continuous training plan? I have a backpack and weights and add weights every week to stimulate progressive overload, so that part is taken care of. As per Glenn's advice, I know I shouldn't be planning failure and, once failure is reached for a 2-week period, I need to ramp the weights back down and start progressively overloading again. Thanks to that, I have not been training to failure, but I nonetheless realized earlier this week that my muscles were fried. I haven't reached failure yet, but my muscles got overloaded anyways. Obviously, this tells me that my workload has ben way too heavy for me to handle without a deloading period.

Of course, I now realize my workload will have to be less to avoid dual-factor training, but how will I know what I can handle or will I just have to find that out myself over time?
 
Did some reading in anotherbutter's journal (roughly post 265 and on from there) . . .

Question -- if you stall, and drop back to do another ramp up as suggested, is should you change the set/rep scheme as well (e.g., 8x3 instead of 5x5) and hold the tonnage constant overall, or should you keep the basic set/rep format and just back off the weights, and then hope to ramp up and bust through the plateau?
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Protobuilder said:
Did some reading in anotherbutter's journal (roughly post 265 and on from there) . . .

Question -- if you stall, and drop back to do another ramp up as suggested, is should you change the set/rep scheme as well (e.g., 8x3 instead of 5x5) and hold the tonnage constant overall, or should you keep the basic set/rep format and just back off the weights, and then hope to ramp up and bust through the plateau?

Depends on what you've been doing in the past. The first time, just resetting and doing the same reps might be a decent idea. If you've done that back to back already and had little progression the 2nd time - don't do it again. Keeping workload constant might be an idea, but then again increasing the weight/intensity and lowering workload works too i.e. 4-5 sets of 3 rather than 8. You could even drop to triples and work on your best triple as you begin to stall on your 5x5. There's a lot of stuff you can do, even trying plateau buster methods like 20 rep squats or doing 5x5 with your best set of 5 and just getting all the reps out no matter how long it takes you. Like I said, training is art as well as science and this is where experience and a coach's eye comes in.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

siamesedream said:
Madcow, how exactly can one judge how much workload they can actually handle without overtraining themselves? As I've stated before, I can't do an already brilliantly-designed program like the 5x5 right now since I have a fairly serious back injury which will plague me for at least 6 more months or so (according to the docs). I've designed a program for myself utilizing exercises like one-legged squats, weighted push-ups, weighted dips, weighted pullups, weighted diamond push-ups, etc. and have been trying very hard to fine-tune it using your geocities webpage as a resource to help me in my design. Well, this week, I was forced to deload by decreasing frequency to 2x a week and dropping the volume since I fried a few of my muscles.

Since I'm deloading, it's no biggie and, as I've learned, it's beneficial to have planned overload and planned deload periods. However, I've been lifting for less than a year and also know that dual-factor training is not something necessary for myself yet, or at least it shouldn't be part of my plan at the moment. Therefore, how exactly can I guage what sort of workload I can handle in order to have a continuous training plan? I have a backpack and weights and add weights every week to stimulate progressive overload, so that part is taken care of. As per Glenn's advice, I know I shouldn't be planning failure and, once failure is reached for a 2-week period, I need to ramp the weights back down and start progressively overloading again. Thanks to that, I have not been training to failure, but I nonetheless realized earlier this week that my muscles were fried. I haven't reached failure yet, but my muscles got overloaded anyways. Obviously, this tells me that my workload has ben way too heavy for me to handle without a deloading period.

Of course, I now realize my workload will have to be less to avoid dual-factor training, but how will I know what I can handle or will I just have to find that out myself over time?

If your strength is still increasing, you are not overtraining or really overreaching (performance deficit is a main indication).

As for determining workload, cookie-cutter shot in the dark based on your experience and what other people have done and work from there. Feel your way, no real other way to do it.
 
FYI I updated both single-factor/linear and dual-factor/periodized versions on my website. I still don't have the excel files hosted and linked but that's coming. I still cringe at the size of these docs, anyone who's run these knows they are damn simple to set up but so many people have anxiety and uncertainty about every little bullshit nuance that more info is better - but it still looks like a much more complicated setup than it is.

Advanced:
http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Periodized_5x5.htm
Intermediate:
http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Linear_5x5.htm
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

I sent this as a response to a PM. I tried to clean it up a bit more. Maybe it's an enjoyable read for some.

Madcow2 said:
I'm thinking you might have a bit of misunderstanding with 1 minute or less rest intervals. You don't get strong on the compound lifts doing that and getting better at these lifts is about the easiest way to add muscle I can think of. Not sure where you got that interpretation but unless he's lost his mind he's not going to tell you to do this on a long term consistent basis all the time on big lifts. Maybe you should clarify with him.

Anyway, all programs work to a degree for hypertrophy. Even Westside which is a dedicated PL program works A LOT better than most of what passes for dedicated hypertrophy programs around the net. Take a look at their lifters - that's a lot of muscle.

Take a look at the pictures in this thread - that guy just started doing biceps regularly, it's all big compound lifts, never really spent any time on hypertrophy specific stuff, looks pretty good dieted down (this is actually a good thread and he speaks to his current training which was altered due to an injury and diet): http://www.midwestbarbell.com/totalelite/index.php?showtopic=1110

I really think post #42 spells it out pretty clearly: http://www.midwestbarbell.com/totalelite/index.php?showtopic=1110&view=findpost&p=15436

Take a look at my response to this question - it should make a lot of sense and maybe clarify things a bit: http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?t=443231

Anyway, I'm not saying there's not more to hypertrophy and building a great body than getting strong in a 5 rep max or 8 rep max range in big lifts (and eating of course). What I'm saying is that this is the overriding major 95% giant block factor and that all the little shit doesn't add up to squat if you aren't doing this - and this is precisely what most BBers don't understand as for some reason they think BBing is black and white different from any other strength sport. I mean, maybe BBers only want to hit doubles and look good running the bases. Okay. So you have a ton of guys tweaking their bats for doubles, trying different gloves, ensuring that they have the prettiest shoes and keep them shined. The problem is that whether you want to hit doubles or home runs you still have to hit the damn ball and swing the bat hard. Spend time learning how to hit the ball and swing the bat hard, worry about the little stuff when you need to but no matter how much effort you put into your outfit or gloves, if you don't know how to hit the ball and can't swing the bat well, you won't be running any bases - doubles or homers. You're in the dug out wearing your fancy shit.

A lot of the BBers who were on Elite's board learned this through the 5x5. They didn't need fancy supplements, or a Zen diet, or tons of isolation work, or a dedicated and stamped "hypertrophy program". They all grew more than they had in years by eating food and getting strong at the compound lifts using a well designed program (and this is largely abscent from BBing as they would know well designed if it bit them on the ass). These guys all remarked about their medial and rear delts really buldging out and looking great under zero direct work and just a bunch of rowing and pressing. Traps getting big from no shrugging, just getting better at deads and rows. No fancy stuff, no exotic angles, no cutting edge research based on snails and untrained elderly parapalegics. Just simple blocking and tackling. And being hypertrophy people, what's the best thing to do when they are done - some work in different rep ranges. More than a few have had a lot of success pairing HST and a 5x5 or whatever together - very similar stuff and they potentiate each other synergistically for a BBer.

Anyway those are my thoughts. Keep it simple. Focus on what's most important for your goal and sweat the small stuff after you have all the big blocks taken care of and optimized. You want to look good hitting doubles, make sure you can acutally hit the ball first before spending all day shopping for the right gloves.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

Most enjoyable ;) I knew I was going to see Gulledge before I clicked the link :)
 
Above, I asked:

protobuilder said:
it seems like DF is a superior training program/theory . . . so why not start there?

My question got answered. I found this today and thought I'd post it as well. It's just part of the readthecore interview w/ Glenn & Rip. This just kinda' backs up what anotherbutters said above.

Mark Rippetoe said:
Whatever means of training you pick, progressing as quickly as possible also involves planning the degree of variation that is appropriate. Whether you use Westside style training or 5X5 to train your squat, if you are capable of increasing the weight on the bar every week, you should be doing it, and not waiting around for the end of an 8 week cycle to increase your weights. Likewise, if you aren’t capable of progressing every workout or every week, you need to add some long-range planning, and not let the appropriate long term stress and rest happen once in a while by accident.

Noobs should milk gains week-to-week if possible rather than complicate things & drag the gains out w/ the DF program.
 
I really hope that point is clear in my stuff now. What has been really been hard for me is to realize that the BBing world doesn't understand that progression is really the key and programming is simply a matter of getting the fastest and most efficient progression for an individual. I've also kind of not realized that a lot of guys don't deliberately track their big lifts at all over time in anything other than an informal 'I used to...these days I' type setting and almost never as a goal. I'm just isolated from the whole BBing thing and kind of assume some stuff is a given.

This stuff would be a lot clearer - and will be eventually as this is kind of why I put that geocities site up so changes were easy, but this began with a fairly homogenous group of people with a minimum of a few years of training experience and often much more or at least some inclination to performance rather than pure aesthetics. As a result, inexperienced people fell through the cracks or got lost in minutia and nuances reading detailed explanations that might have been theoretically interesting for them but not appropriate to implement.
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

I am just getting back into training after a trauma (auto accident) blood clot almost made me "no more".

I am recovered and have dusted off the cob webs for the past 30 days and feel ready to rumble.

My first question is what can I sub. for weighted dips?
My home gym has a ton of items BUT NO dip rack for now..
How long should I utilize this type of program before I experiment with Dual?
During my layoff of 1 year I accumulated some FAT.
I have lost 15 lbs just by rearranging my eating habits and plan to keep it simple with med-high pro/low-med starchy carbs/high veggies/better fats
I wish to slow starve the fat by building muscle and worry about leaning up later next year. I hope my increased activity will naturally help.

Am I thinking right.?
My competitive day were some time ago and pharmaceuticals played a part so I may be off a notch or two here...

All help is appreciated.....

Brother_Swole
 
Re: Bill Starr's 5 x 5 program... Variation per Madcow2 (thanx) So here it is! K up n

My first question is what can I sub. for weighted dips?
My home gym has a ton of items BUT NO dip rack for now..
Close grip bench press would work
How long should I utilize this type of program before I experiment with Dual
Til you hit a prolonged sticking point. Milk it for all it's worth. IMO you're gonna gain like CRAZY coming off a layoff. Start light so your joints have time to get strong - your muscles will likely blow the hell up once you train heavy.
During my layoff of 1 year I accumulated some FAT.
I have lost 15 lbs just by rearranging my eating habits and plan to keep it simple with med-high pro/low-med starchy carbs/high veggies/better fats
I wish to slow starve the fat by building muscle and worry about leaning up later next year. I hope my increased activity will naturally help.

Am I thinking right.?

I think so.

Glad to hear you recovered well enough to get back under the bar. Good luck bud.
 
Last edited:
JM Press is a good triceps exercise. Prefer pressing movements to extensions. Mix up your bench grip width during a session for at least your warmups.

Wow, we've hit 1000 posts in this thread.
 
Top Bottom