mekannik
New member
Spatts - I can agree with you to a point. However my stance is that d.b. (combined) total weight will be considerably less than the total weight of any max/near max bb bench weight - and hence less stress on the shoulders.
Also the d.b.'s allow for more natural movement on the path of the weight than does the bb (and to extrapolate - the smith machine).
One last point - a PL's bench style will not translate to a "developed" chest as seen thru the eyes of a bodybuilder (or physique artist). Again - d.b.'s are more suited for this (in my opinion) as is the bb's style of bench (elbows out, etc).
cool?
cool.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc08e/bc08eca8036d7f1aad09c42d210f6ee69569825c" alt="bigkiss :bigkiss: :bigkiss:"
Also the d.b.'s allow for more natural movement on the path of the weight than does the bb (and to extrapolate - the smith machine).
One last point - a PL's bench style will not translate to a "developed" chest as seen thru the eyes of a bodybuilder (or physique artist). Again - d.b.'s are more suited for this (in my opinion) as is the bb's style of bench (elbows out, etc).
cool?
cool.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc08e/bc08eca8036d7f1aad09c42d210f6ee69569825c" alt="bigkiss :bigkiss: :bigkiss:"