Hangfire said:I didn't see anything in the article that indicates erosion of rights. What did catch my atttention, though, is the usual whining from the left about the treatment of suspected terrorists. To the Liberals, kid-glove handling of potential murderers is more important than eradicating the threat. The threat will always be there until this government gets serious about it, and that means quit fucking around with these people and do what needs to be done. Preservation of the rights of terrorists is NOT more important than preservation of our nation.
I'll honestly cry if President Bush doesn't get re-elected.
the trouble begins when you have to define terrorists....
wait until potential terrorists get exposed to this legislation....i'm using the slippery-slope arguement the right wing constantly uses over 'moral' issues
think it won;t happen? ireland used to misuse its anti-terrorist legislation routinely....why won;t the US? frankly the amount of symbolism the US has chosen for its new homeland security agenicies etc thAT bear a resemblance to past facist logo's itsel;f frightens me...which is why i wouldnt vote for bush