Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CFZB said:This the best answer so far.
but I still ask why.
jerseyart said:Priests are married to the Church.
If sex is a biological necessity, then a lot of guys on this board should be dead by now.
The problem is people confuse the role of a priest with that of any other Christian minister, and that simply isnt the case. It's the same reason in many respects that there are no female priests.
The priest, most especially in the Eucharist (but also in other sacraments such as confession) act in what is known as in Persona Cristae (in the person of Christ). He in effect becomes for us a physical conduit for Christ on earth,
The priest take oaths of obedience and chastity (sometimes poverty) in imitation of Christ. He sets himself to live by Christs example, and devote himself completely to God. In essence he rejects the things of this earth in pursuit of Holiness.
A husband by necessity must be devoted to his wife and children, and that is how it should be.He fulfills his love for God in service to his family. A priest devotes Himself to serve only God, and in so doing devotes himself to serve all. His chastity is a gift to God, and that act of sacrifice is done as a gift to all humanity (Catholics unlike other Christian denominations believe in works coupled with faith, not just faith alone). There is value in sacrifice.
The reason that there are no female priests is because the Church is bound by the example of Christ. Christ chose no female apostles, and by tradition the Church doesnt either. More importantly, God chose to manifest Himself on earth as a man, not as a woman. The priest in his function as a "step in" for Christ, so to speak,because of that uses men in the role of priests. In short, Christ wasn't female, and the Church has no authority to say to God "well he should have been"
jerseyart said:Then you should recognize it is unnecessary and rather disingenous to ask a Catholic which Bible they think is proper to follow
CFZB said:and you believe none of this is open to interpretation?
also what do you think about the books of the bible that are missing...
the ones with the women in it?
Do you think that if women were allowed to come forward in those times...
to interpret and log christs words..
they wouldnt have?
jerseyart said:I didnt say it wasn't open to debate. But you haven't debated the points. Instead you pretended as if no one answered your question
As I said, what do you disagree with bor. Which part?
And there are no missing books in the Bible. To suggest there are misses the entire point of how the Bible books were compiled.
And it had nothign to do with who logged Christs words, but Christs example. There are no female apostles, and Christ was a man. Is there some alternate reality Im not aware of bor?
where did i disagree with anything besides the fact you didnt answer what I meant?jerseyart said:I didnt say it wasn't open to debate. But you haven't debated the points. Instead you pretended as if no one answered your question
As I said, what do you disagree with bor. Which part?
And there are no missing books in the Bible. To suggest there are misses the entire point of how the Bible books were compiled.
And it had nothign to do with who logged Christs words, but Christs example. There are no female apostles, and Christ was a man. Is there some alternate reality Im not aware of bor?
BrothaBill said:Huh? Catholics cant ask questions? what are you smoking? Can Catholic children ask their parents about the bible? Whats the age cutoff for that? I didnt get the memo.