Even if it was cut&pasted from another board (who's motivation may be suspect), the point of the study is still valid. It contradicted PP's claims and I would have liked to have seen his response rather than have it quickly recycled. PP's a smart guy and I am sure he could have come up with a well-reasoned response to the claim. By sweeping it under the rug it smacks of favoritism. Which is something one of the mods was cautioned about before he accepted the position.