Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Women can now be in open combat roles
- Thread starter nangiggles
- Start date
Do you feel this way because their brains are smaller?
homingpigeon
New member
ppgfreak
New member
I'm not sexist at all. I treat women the same as men. That being said, I don't think women should be in combat (infantry,sf,recon,seal,ranger,ect) Most men can not handle those jobs, that's a fact. I did 6 years in the United States Marine Corps (infantry) and there was never one physical standered that was the same for both sexes. All the run time standereds, pull ups, sit ups,ect were MUCH easier for the women. So they will not be nearly as ready for combat, or be able to keep up and hold there own. Every obstacle course was WAY easier for the women even in boot camp. So why would you take a less trained and overall weaker person and throw them in combat?
If they want to be in combat, than they should have the same standereds as men. As soon as they actually do, then we can talk about this.
Sent from my ADR6350 using EliteFitness
If they want to be in combat, than they should have the same standereds as men. As soon as they actually do, then we can talk about this.
Sent from my ADR6350 using EliteFitness
That's what I said, except I can spell.
You fucking better!
interesting arguments up in here, the infection/period one is ridiculous but some are pretty valid, it is foolish to think men and women are alike physically or even mentally, that being said, there are still a ton of broads who can carry their own and then sum, like Shirl said it's not like women are all safe and sound while deployed they're still getting maimed and fucked up, I do see some men being soft and trying to risk their lives more for a female then a male, but then again doesnt that make them the weak ones and not us? I'm thinking they might send all female groups for testing at first... who knows what this will bring, interesting stuff.
yeah, that shit only happens in movies.
