Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why Do 'respected" Guru's

Wrongun said:
Another Elite drama LMAO

who cares IMHO

Wrongun!

You did but you're right, it is turning into a drama. I just think what he did was lame and manipulative.

Wrongun said:
Name and Shame Flexed IMHO

Wrongun!
 
colt1911 said:
flexed1, what is the other user of this person and are there more than 1, who knows how far back it could go.

I am sure there are much more than one. All the chat board users have more than one, lol...But they also have ALOT of free time on their hands too....
 
Juice Authority said:


You did but you're right, it is turning into a drama. I just think what he did was lame and manipulative.


Yes Bro TBH i thought it was someone promoting an UG lab that produced bunk (e.g. the recent Pegasus issues) but then 30 mins later it is the usual Elite Drama.

Agreed lame and manipulative and good drama but not about how to use AAS to reach goals and differeing experiences and theories.

I disagree with some of what Nelson says but read his book to get full overview.

A lot does not make sense and much goes against chemical theory. With that said a lot has been taken from user experience and we must remember every user is different. Maybe showing my age but at one time Dan Duchaine wrote the bible to AAS but many of his conclusions have been proved innacurate with time.

If we do not keep an open mind and listen to what some people have accieved even agains common belief then we will not progress IMHO.

This game is a mix between chemical theory and user experience. I think it is good to have alternative views and solid debates and hence i welcome Nelsons comments. Yes his style can be brash at times but always a heathy debate which is thought provoking if nothing else.

Now back to the subject Nelson does not strike me as someone who would care if you agree with him or not and actually thrives on people that don't. With that in mind i can not see him spending time using different names to back his theories he does that himself and you can agree or disagree and hence i lost my interest.

If it is him then i can not think why as yes it is lame and manipulative but he is capable of being more manipulative by putting solid arguments in his writing under his own name.

People that do this sort of thing usually have something to gain (i.e. more sales of bunk Pegasus).

Thats why Bro no flame just another Elite Drama which has no benefit and IMHO does not discredit Nelson, if it is him just makes him look foolish as he has nothing to gain from it. What sells books is his ability to debate his beliefs and unless you read and digest you will never be able to dismiss for yourself.

Wrongun!
 
Wrongun, this post was me venting about somebody using made up names to make themselves look good. There was no intention at "drama" just me saying what I feel is something I had to say. I speak from my personal learning experiences before I answer any post and don'tc change names to make my points look vaild if someone does not agree. Every answer I give on a subect is my personal knowledge and if someone does not agree I don't keep hamering my point as I know I have answered from personal experience not what I have read. Drama comes only if you allow it. I will not name names and facts are facts not drama. Does not matter who I was speaking of as it is not important. If you read my post again it speaks very clearly about my personal thought.
 
So many people have these silly 'alter egos' on elite. From Massivegunz to Victorian Guy, theres a whole bunch of them. As long as it's all in good fun, I could care less.
 
flexed1 said:
Wrongun, this post was me venting about somebody using made up names to make themselves look good. There was no intention at "drama" just me saying what I feel is something I had to say. I speak from my personal learning experiences before I answer any post and don'tc change names to make my points look vaild if someone does not agree. Every answer I give on a subect is my personal knowledge and if someone does not agree I don't keep hamering my point as I know I have answered from personal experience not what I have read. Drama comes only if you allow it. I will not name names and facts are facts not drama. Does not matter who I was speaking of as it is not important. If you read my post again it speaks very clearly about my personal thought.

And i agree with you 100% as there is not an argument against.

What i stated was that in 30 mins we had the Elite drama of guessing who and hence my comments of who cares who it is IMHO as it was teh principal not the culprit.

My lengthy post above was in response to Juice Authority and why i had lost total interest. As the guessing / blaming / accusing had started i put my thoughts forward under my one and only login (for this and any other board i visit) in regards to the set accusation of one member (where you were generalising).

The principal is the same if you are promoting a product or theory there is no need to login under many different names to enforce the issue. As you were not speaking of anyone in particular and do not wish to name names then yes you have vented and yes it has turned into an Elite Drama of guessing who.

Wrongun!
 
Top Bottom