Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Robin Hood morality quiz - What is your attitude to morals, sex and honesty?

BIKINIMOM said:
Did you miss the part where Robin Hood harshly rejected Maid Marion AFTER he got his freedom?

DId the thought ever occur to you that perhaps Little John realized that a "man" like Robin Hood wasn't someone he wanted to call "friend" after he treated Maid Marion the way he did?

Did it ever occur to you that the holy man was ready to accept whatever he could, including comprimising whores?
 
i see that a lot of people are logically challenged on this thread. Maybe you should give your egos a rest and let "reason" come to your senses?
 
mountain muscle said:
Marion was used. Period. Robin faced death without her and she folded. He did not have to rely on her.

She compromised her morality then her faith.

You may look it over again and find the fault in the process and not the "sorry, pathetic" men.

Issues abound in everyone's answer to this question.

How convenient it was for him to reject her AFTER he gained his freedom eh?

Marion was not used. SHE OFFERED herself becsause she wanted to save the man she loved. It wasnt until AFTER Robin Hood rejected her for this selfless act that one *might* think this. But that is not the case. At least she found out what kind of man he REALLY was. He would have most likely left her hanging the same way if she ever needed him.

I dont know about you but if it was me in prison and my husband having to sleep with the evil queen in order to secure my freedom that WE could live together, do you think I would give a fat rat's ass if he fucked her? Would I be happy about the fact that my husband would be put in that position? NO! But the situation was, what it was. Would I be happier if he chose to remain chaste meaning that I would be doomed to live a life in a dungeon without him anyway?

I WOULD CURSE HIM TILL THE DAY HE DIED.

And my husband came to the identical conclusion. Which, as I said, is good FOR US.
 
jestro said:
Now, what if Robin Hood got a parking ticket for tieing his horse up without a permit. Should Mariane give a BJ to the traffic cop to get him out of it?

Yes you are correct. This is an accurate analogy. LOL :rolleyes:

How bout Robin Hood take care of his own shit so that he wont have to constantly have to have his lady compromise her morals to save him.
 
mountain muscle said:
Did it ever occur to you that the holy man was ready to accept whatever he could, including comprimising whores?

Oh now Robin Hood is holy? LMAO

If he was willing to accept a compromising whore, then why didn't he do just that?
 
BIKINIMOM said:
Oh now Robin Hood is holy? LMAO

If he was willing to accept a compromising whore, then why didn't he do just that?
I think mountian muscle was confusing little john, and friar tuck. He needs to catch up on his reading.
 
BIKINIMOM said:
How convenient it was for him to reject her AFTER he gained his freedom eh?

Marion was not used. SHE OFFERED herself becsause she wanted to save the man she loved. It wasnt until AFTER Robin Hood rejected her for this selfless act that one *might* think this. But that is not the case. At least she found out what kind of man he REALLY was. He would have most likely left her hanging the same way if she ever needed him.

I dont know about you but if it was me in prison and my husband having to sleep with the evil queen in order to secure my freedom that WE could live together, do you think I would give a fat rat's ass if he fucked her? Would I be happy about the fact that my husband would be put in that position? NO! But the situation was, what it was. Would I be happier if he chose to remain chaste meaning that I would be doomed to live a life in a dungeon without him anyway?

I WOULD CURSE HIM TILL THE DAY HE DIED.

And my husband came to the identical conclusion. Which, as I said, is good FOR US.

I love you for your supposed moral covictions BM. There was no offer on her part, she had to concede. Either way I would rather die than have to live with the fact my woman slept with my mortal enemy to obtain my freedom.
The fact she went with his best friend belays your point as well, but I understand where you are coming from.
The question is problematic at best.
If she truely wanted to sacrifice for him she would have organized a rebellion to free him or died in the process. She chose differently. A means which was easy and sacrificed her morality. You defend her for it. Hmm.
 
Subzeero said:
John, is not morally compromised whatsoever, he is as clean as they come. Then the Maid. She compromised. She sacrificed her body for the sake of her love. Sacrifice is a great virtue.

Sherrif: Not so moral of him at all to dictate such conditions to the maid. BUT not as immoral Robin. This is why he is less immoral, but not any more moral than robin.

Robin: He is ignorant, inconsiderate, and lacks all compassion besides the fact that he is immoral.

This is the result of that ranking combination.

You are the slightly romantic realist. You respect truth, and are broadminded and flexible. Whether you are a man or a woman you are probably a happy person. You like people and they can readily make friends with you. You are not very adventurous, but this does not bother you.

This combination represents 10% of total, 9% of men and 10% of women

You know, I TOTALLY glossed over this fact... however, after discussing this with my husband we are both in agreement that though Little John did NOTHING WRONG - Marion was just a bit above him as she was put into a difficult situation and she showed her true colors. She gave of herself willingly to save another and was honest about it, even though what she did WAS immoral. That is why we put Maid Marion ahead of Litte John.
 
mountain muscle said:
I love you for your supposed moral covictions BM. There was no offer on her part, she had to concede. Either way I would rather die than have to live with the fact my woman slept with my mortal enemy to obtain my freedom.
The fact she went with his best friend belays your point as well, but I understand where you are coming from.
The question is problematic at best.
If she truely wanted to sacrifice for him she would have organized a rebellion to free him or died in the process. She chose differently. A means which was easy and sacrificed her morality. You defend her for it. Hmm.

She didnt HAVE to concede. Remember... you are supposed to forget about the rest of the story?

Your opinions are idealistic and I am not knocking you. But in THE REAL WORLD - life imprisonment or have my S/O sleep with whomever ONCE? There is ZERO CHOICE.
 
Top Bottom