R. Kelly Walks: Jury Finds Him Not Guilty Of Child Pornography

[mrplunkey]

He got off because he is filthy stinking rich. No other reason.

Yup yup yup!

Exactly. Nothing to do with race and everything to do with cash.

 

[milo hobgoblin]

as much as the idea disgusts me..

if the jury really isnt sure its her and she says its not her on the tape..

then they got nothing..

But G is right LA seems to have a prorblem convicting anyone wealthy.. regardless of race.

 

[Razorguns]

He got off because he is filthy stinking rich. No other reason.

Money to pay off or scare the other party.

Have a nice day.

r

 

[Bikini Mod]

Justice prevails until bankruptcy occurs.

Learn it.

Live it.

Love it.

Always been that way and always will be. Anyone who thinks any different is naive.

 

[puddlemonkey]

Only a complete idiot would attempt to make such a comparison
Yees there are plenty of black snitches out there

Didn't Vicks 3 buddies roll over?

 

[EnderJE]

Maybe he's actually innocent? Or has the trial of public opinion sentenced him yet?

 

[gjohnson5]

LOL w/Friends like Michael Vick's who needs enemies....
They snitched HARD!!!!

Didn't Vicks 3 buddies roll over?

 

[velvett]

The victim denies she's on the tape...

Nuff Said

^^^^^^^^

They didn't have a chance in hell to win this, how can you win a case when the "victim" is on the same side as the defendant?

 

[gjohnson5]

I'm not saying a crime wasn't committed. Clearly the video tape shows a crime.

If the "victim" is not claiming they are a "victim" then maybe they shouldn't have prosecuted this

^^^^^^^^

They didn't have a chance in hell to win this, how can you win a case when the "victim" is on the same side as the defendant?

 

[velvett]

I'm not saying a crime wasn't committed. Clearly the video tape shows a crime.

If the "victim" is not claiming they are a "victim" then maybe they shouldn't have prosecuted this

Oh I know.
And I agree, I don't know what they were thinking to continue forward with this.