bluepeter
New member
JerseyArt said:
No, You!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
JerseyArt said:
bluepeter said:Oh please. Find me one US city with a population over 2 million that has something even remotely close to the number of murders per year we have in our large cities like Toronto, Montreal or Vancouver. Find one. Come on.
bran987 said:and they brag so much about how they have no gun crimes
Razorguns said:You're missing the point still.
Canada doesn't have ghettos. It's crime is SPREAD-OUT over the masses.
Whereas in LA, the crime is in certain areas.
While the other areas are bullet-proof and safe.
Conclusion:
Guess which area *I'd* want to live in?
Like I said -- if you remove the ghetto cities from LA and then compare -- the facts change DRASTICALLY.
Look up the crime and murder rates of Brentwood or Huntington Beach or Sunnyvale, Ca and compare to Toronto.
"Crime spread out among the population" is apparently used as a proud fact by Canadians. All it does is make every citizen more susceptible to crime is what they don't realize.
Personally -- if everyone in Compton wants to shoot and kill each other -- fine by me. It's that old addage: "Not in my backyard".
bluepeter said:I'll give you a hint. Los Angeles with a population of approximately 4 million had around 620 murders in 2002. Toronto with a population of around 3 million had around 60 murders in 2002.
I'll let you do the math.
bluepeter said:I'm getting the point, it's just nonsensical. You wish to remove certain elements of your fucked up society so we can get a fairer comparison? lmao
You want to compare a couple of small ritzy areas of one of your cities to a city of 5 million people? Wow, that sounds reasonable. That's like me saying to you that I want to compare Richmond Hill to the entire city of Chicago.
Here's a little chore for you. You go ahead and remove the shitty elements of your city. Chop the number of murders that occured in Los Angeles last year by 80% and then we'll compare with Toronto. What do you come up with?
I'll give you a hint. Los Angeles with a population of approximately 4 million had around 620 murders in 2002. Toronto with a population of around 3 million had around 60 murders in 2002.
I'll let you do the math.
bluepeter said:OK, so Razor has chosen to obfuscate and avoid the obvious so I'll do it for him.
As stated, remove 80% of the murders in Los Angeles because he doesn't want to compare anything but Beverly Hills and we get approximately 125 murders. That still leaves us with more than double the 60 murders in Toronto that year
I'd ask you to explain that to everyone but this is obviously pointless. You believe what you want.