Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
It's Official! California is *DOOMED*
- Thread starter p0ink
- Start date
A
ajtomasi
Guest
only one third of R&D money goes to discovering and create new drugs, the other two thirds is spend on advertising and marketing.
I hope the pharma-companies eat a fat dick on this one.
I hope the pharma-companies eat a fat dick on this one.
atlantabiolab
New member
Re: Well....
Doctors don't have the ability to demand higher and higher pay, they can only request an amount that the market will pay. A doctor can ASK for a million dollars a year, but if no can pay it he goes out of business. This is the same for hospitals and insurance companies, they can only exist as long as others can afford their service.
Lawyers are different. They use the force of government to confiscate money, whether for real or made-up reasons. Not to mention they utilize the stupidity of the public to obtain their verdicts.
No person's services are for the benefit of others, they are for the benefit of the holder. I, and you, do not work to benefit others, we work to benefit ourselves. If my services are agreeable to others, then they pay for it and I am rewarded. I do my best to service other's needs only to promote my business and thus my rewards.
As I stated a doctor, or anyone, can EXPECT any income, but I can only receive what others agree to pay.
Profit improves the services of the business. I can pay for better doctors, better equipment, better facilities. No profit prevents my services to the customer.
Again, a doctor goes into practice to benefit himself, and his services secondarily benefit the public, but no one is required to become a doctor, so no one is obliged to health care.
Their outrageous costs is exacerbated by the exaggerated damages that juries award. So the public is also to blame.
The bastardized government/free-market system that we have is the major cause of our exaggerated costs. The Medicare system devours the young at the expense of the old, the healthy at the expense of the sick. With the advancing elderly population and the declining young, this will only increase. The concept of "free, unlimited" healthcare has been utilized by people to the extent of the idea. Go to the doctor for every cut, scrape and cough. But resources are not unlimited, nor free.
A free-market system would prevent doctors, hospitals, insurance companies from charging enormous fees, because you can only exist if others can pay, which would expand competition and lower prices. Doctors at the turn of the century could not charge huge fees, because they were paid by the individual, not a huge pool of money taken from the public or insurance firms. Death rates were higher, but this is due to inefficiency, lack of scientific knowledge, effective medical treatments, as well as a host of other variables.
Baby Gorilla said:
Doctors don't have the ability to demand higher and higher pay, they can only request an amount that the market will pay. A doctor can ASK for a million dollars a year, but if no can pay it he goes out of business. This is the same for hospitals and insurance companies, they can only exist as long as others can afford their service.
Lawyers are different. They use the force of government to confiscate money, whether for real or made-up reasons. Not to mention they utilize the stupidity of the public to obtain their verdicts.
No person's services are for the benefit of others, they are for the benefit of the holder. I, and you, do not work to benefit others, we work to benefit ourselves. If my services are agreeable to others, then they pay for it and I am rewarded. I do my best to service other's needs only to promote my business and thus my rewards.
As I stated a doctor, or anyone, can EXPECT any income, but I can only receive what others agree to pay.
Profit improves the services of the business. I can pay for better doctors, better equipment, better facilities. No profit prevents my services to the customer.
Again, a doctor goes into practice to benefit himself, and his services secondarily benefit the public, but no one is required to become a doctor, so no one is obliged to health care.
Their outrageous costs is exacerbated by the exaggerated damages that juries award. So the public is also to blame.
The bastardized government/free-market system that we have is the major cause of our exaggerated costs. The Medicare system devours the young at the expense of the old, the healthy at the expense of the sick. With the advancing elderly population and the declining young, this will only increase. The concept of "free, unlimited" healthcare has been utilized by people to the extent of the idea. Go to the doctor for every cut, scrape and cough. But resources are not unlimited, nor free.
A free-market system would prevent doctors, hospitals, insurance companies from charging enormous fees, because you can only exist if others can pay, which would expand competition and lower prices. Doctors at the turn of the century could not charge huge fees, because they were paid by the individual, not a huge pool of money taken from the public or insurance firms. Death rates were higher, but this is due to inefficiency, lack of scientific knowledge, effective medical treatments, as well as a host of other variables.
Fast Twitch Fiber
New member
p0ink said:
Just to refute your metaphor, rocks can contain a lot of water depending on proximity to a water source and the particular rock type's porosity.
D
DcupSheepNipples
Guest
It's Official! California is *DOOMED*
Correction! Mankind is *DOOMED* on earth In 5 Billion years!
Correction! Mankind is *DOOMED* on earth In 5 Billion years!
Last edited:
Similar threads
