Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Is this self defense or murder?

Warrant was violation of Parasiris's rights
Jurors never heard police were after drugs: evidence seized from home was thrown out
Paul Cherry, Gazette crime reporter
Published: Tuesday, June 10

LAVAL - As the six women and six men of the jury in the first-degree murder trial of Basil Parasiris enter their second day of deliberations today, one nagging question must be on most of their minds: Why did Laval police Constable Daniel Tessier and eight of his colleagues storm into Parasiris's home in Brossard on March 2, 2007?

Parasiris killed Tessier during a shootout with police because, the defendant says, he believed it was a home invasion.

The jurors have never been told why the police were there.

In a decision rendered before the jury began hearing evidence, Superior Court Judge Guy Cournoyer ruled the warrant that allowed Laval police to smash down the front door of Parasiris's house on Rimouski Cres. and conduct an aggressive predawn drug raid inside his home was a violation of his rights.

That meant any evidence the police seized inside his home that might have linked him to a small drug trafficking ring that operated in Laval was tossed out.

The warrant, authorized by Gaby Dumas, a justice of the peace, gave Laval police the green light to use a dynamic entry - meant to surprise the person being investigated - to carry out their search for evidence.

Such warrants are supposed to be granted only under extraordinary circumstances, when investigators suspect a person is keeping a large quantity of drugs and might flush away evidence if police come calling with a standard "knock and notice" search warrant.

Cournoyer ruled the warrant used to enter Parasiris's home on the South Shore was abusive and violated his Canadian Charter right to "be secure against unreasonable search or seizure."

Laval police never did find a large quantity of cocaine inside Parasiris's home.

What they did find were 13 cellphones, four pagers and eight pages of documents that a Sûreté du Québec investigator described during Parasiris's bail hearing in May 2007 as resembling the accounts of a drug trafficker. During the same bail hearing, the investigator said that while Parasiris was being interrogated he admitted to having been involved in drug trafficking for three years to solve financial problems.

The jury never got to hear about that side of Parasiris, because Laval police clearly made mistakes when applying for their warrant.

Because of Cournoyer's decision, police officers who testified in the murder trial had to be cautioned against using terms like "drug raid" or "dynamic entry," or even identifying themselves as being part of the Laval police morality-drug squad.

Using the warrant, Tessier and eight other officers were allowed to smash in Parasiris's door with a battering ram and storm in with their weapons drawn while shouting, "Police!"

It also meant they could conduct the raid early in the morning instead of during daylight hours, when standard search warrants are supposed to be executed.

The reasons why Laval police wanted to go into Parasiris's home with such force remain unclear.

Near the end of March 2006, François Leblanc, a member of the Laval police morality-drug squad, was assigned to investigate a tip from Montreal police. An informant had told Montreal investigators that three people were selling cocaine and were using Bar Le Skratch in Laval as a meeting point.

The same informant referred to one of the drug dealers as Mani; he turned out to be Laval resident Emmanuel Mavroudis. According to the affidavit Leblanc used to obtain the warrant, the informant also said: "Mani's uncle, an individual residing in Longueuil, is the supplier of these individuals. He is about 45 to 50 years old."

Based on information they gathered later, Laval police came to believe the "uncle" to whom the informant referred was Parasiris, who lived in Brossard, then a borough of Longueuil. Parasiris was 40 at the time.

(According to evidence presented at Parasiris's bail hearing, Mavroudis is his godson.)

The investigation gradually uncovered four other drug traffickers who appeared to be linked through Mavroudis.

A little more than a month after getting the tip, Leblanc gathered enough information to send a plainclothes police officer to buy drugs from the dealers. When the officer called one of the dealers, he arranged to meet her outside Le Skratch, on Curé Labelle Blvd. Hours later, she bought a half-gram of cocaine from a man who turned out to be Mavroudis.

By Oct. 25, 2006, after making several small cocaine purchases from Mavroudis and other dealers he sent to her, the same undercover officer began asking for larger quantities of cocaine. Laval investigators did this with the goal of finding out where the dealers kept their stash of cocaine.

Weeks later, Parasiris's name came up for the first time in the investigation. Nikolaos Xanthis, one of the drug dealers to whom Laval police were paying particular attention, was pulled over in Longueuil for speeding. The car he was driving, a Pontiac Grand Prix, was registered to Parasiris. Leblanc checked to see if Parasiris had a criminal record and found nothing.

One week later, Laval police investigators conducting surveillance on Xanthis followed him to an apartment in a duplex on Broadway St. in Brossard. No one appeared to live at the address. Laval police believed they had finally found the location where the dealers hid their cocaine.

While it was relatively close to Parasiris's home, the Brossard apartment still didn't link him to the drug dealers, who were all Laval residents.

The first link didn't come until Feb. 13, 2007, when investigators were following Xanthis while he was driving around and appeared to be making small drug deals.

While running errands, he stopped at Golf-O-Max, a club in Dorval where patrons practise their swings on golf simulators. It's housed in the same building as a bar, and both businesses were part-owned by Parasiris.

Police watched as Xanthis headed to an office inside Golf-O-Max and then appeared to sell drugs to customers.

After leaving the Dorval club, Xanthis travelled to the apartment on Broadway St. in Brossard. He went inside, came out a minute later, then headed for Parasiris's home on Rimouski Cres., where he stayed for about 30 minutes before returning again to the apartment.

Then, on Feb. 27, 2007, while Laval police morality-drug investigators followed, Xanthis travelled from his home in Laval to the apartment on Broadway St. While he was inside, an individual who appeared to be Basil Parasiris showed up in a car registered to Parasiris's wife, Penny Gounis.

Laval police never clearly established it was Parasiris who showed up.

A day after Parasiris appeared to have been spotted at the apartment on Broadway, Leblanc did an analysis of a beacon device that had been secretly placed on a BMW Mavroudis used to make drug deals. The device indicated Mavroudis was near Parasiris's home on Rimouski Cres. 10 times between Dec. 6, 2006, and Feb. 1, 2007. The BMW had also been to the Golf-O-Max in Dorval twice during the same period.

On the same day Leblanc did the analysis on the beacon, he received another tip from Montreal police. Citing an anonymous source, a Montreal police organized crime investigator said a man named Bill (the name Parasiris goes by), the owner of the Golf-O-Max in Dorval, was tied to cocaine trafficking.

The anonymous tipster said "Bill" sold marijuana and cocaine at the Golf-O-Max. The same tipster also supplied a cellphone number that turned out to be registered to Kosta Katsiouleris, one of the drug dealers Laval police were already investigating.

Using those bits of information, Laval police decided to include Parasiris's home as a place they wanted to search when they planned to carry out their operation targeting the other five drug dealers. They initially believed they would find a large quantity of drugs inside the apartment on Broadway St. and planned to conduct a dynamic entry there.

They also originally planned to go to Parasiris's home with a standard search warrant.

During Parasiris's bail hearing in 2007, a Sûreté du Québec investigator said Laval police changed their plans out of fear someone living in the Broadway St. duplex would hear them break down the door at 5 a.m. and tip off people whose homes would be searched an hour later.

Laval police decided to ask permission to use a dynamic entry at Parasiris's home instead. Leblanc managed to persuade the justice of the peace to approve the warrant even though Leblanc had no evidence Parasiris kept drugs inside his home.

That's the main reason the warrant and evidence resulting from it were tossed out before Parasiris's murder trial.

During a pretrial hearing, members of the Laval police morality-drug squad tried to explain why they suddenly wanted to raid Parasiris's home, using a dynamic entry. But in his written decision, Cournoyer described their reasoning as "incomprehensible."

"The use of force was not justified under the circumstances because the case did not establish that a (regular search warrant) would bring about the loss or imminent destruction of evidence," the judge stated in his decision.

Cournoyer also noted the police had no direct evidence Parasiris either supplied drugs to Xanthis or Mavroudis or that he stored drugs inside his home.

"The (affidavit) did nothing but establish the existence of contacts (visits to homes, businesses and telephone calls) between drug traffickers and Mr. Parasiris in circumstances that did not establish the reasonable probability that Mr. Parasiris is implicated in drug trafficking and was supplying Mr. Xanthis and/or Mavroudis," Cournoyer wrote.

Parasiris also faces eight weapons-related charges, including the illegal possession of three firearms.
 
jerseyrugger76 said:
Based strictly on what you posted, I say self-defense. It sounds as if the whole situation could have transpired in a few seconds, which may not have been long enough for the "intruders" to identify themselves as police to the guy. That said, the cops on TV are pretty good about announcing their presence before they go in with guns blazing. Maybe things in real life don't go as smoothly. Perhaps one of our many ex cons can comment? ;)

I agree with this. I also did not read the full story.
 
Drug dealer or not, if they surprised him, and failed to clearly identify themselves upon entry it was self defense. I would be fine convicting him of a lesser charge if there actually was proof of trafficking.
 
blueta2 said:
Warrant was violation of Parasiris's rights
Jurors never heard police were after drugs: evidence seized from home was thrown out
Paul Cherry, Gazette crime reporter
Published: Tuesday, June 10

LAVAL - As the six women and six men of the jury in the first-degree murder trial of Basil Parasiris enter their second day of deliberations today, one nagging question must be on most of their minds: Why did Laval police Constable Daniel Tessier and eight of his colleagues storm into Parasiris's home in Brossard on March 2, 2007?

Parasiris killed Tessier during a shootout with police because, the defendant says, he believed it was a home invasion.

The jurors have never been told why the police were there.

In a decision rendered before the jury began hearing evidence, Superior Court Judge Guy Cournoyer ruled the warrant that allowed Laval police to smash down the front door of Parasiris's house on Rimouski Cres. and conduct an aggressive predawn drug raid inside his home was a violation of his rights.

That meant any evidence the police seized inside his home that might have linked him to a small drug trafficking ring that operated in Laval was tossed out.

The warrant, authorized by Gaby Dumas, a justice of the peace, gave Laval police the green light to use a dynamic entry - meant to surprise the person being investigated - to carry out their search for evidence.

Such warrants are supposed to be granted only under extraordinary circumstances, when investigators suspect a person is keeping a large quantity of drugs and might flush away evidence if police come calling with a standard "knock and notice" search warrant.

Cournoyer ruled the warrant used to enter Parasiris's home on the South Shore was abusive and violated his Canadian Charter right to "be secure against unreasonable search or seizure."

Laval police never did find a large quantity of cocaine inside Parasiris's home.

What they did find were 13 cellphones, four pagers and eight pages of documents that a Sûreté du Québec investigator described during Parasiris's bail hearing in May 2007 as resembling the accounts of a drug trafficker. During the same bail hearing, the investigator said that while Parasiris was being interrogated he admitted to having been involved in drug trafficking for three years to solve financial problems.

The jury never got to hear about that side of Parasiris, because Laval police clearly made mistakes when applying for their warrant.

Because of Cournoyer's decision, police officers who testified in the murder trial had to be cautioned against using terms like "drug raid" or "dynamic entry," or even identifying themselves as being part of the Laval police morality-drug squad.

Using the warrant, Tessier and eight other officers were allowed to smash in Parasiris's door with a battering ram and storm in with their weapons drawn while shouting, "Police!"

It also meant they could conduct the raid early in the morning instead of during daylight hours, when standard search warrants are supposed to be executed.

The reasons why Laval police wanted to go into Parasiris's home with such force remain unclear.

Near the end of March 2006, François Leblanc, a member of the Laval police morality-drug squad, was assigned to investigate a tip from Montreal police. An informant had told Montreal investigators that three people were selling cocaine and were using Bar Le Skratch in Laval as a meeting point.

The same informant referred to one of the drug dealers as Mani; he turned out to be Laval resident Emmanuel Mavroudis. According to the affidavit Leblanc used to obtain the warrant, the informant also said: "Mani's uncle, an individual residing in Longueuil, is the supplier of these individuals. He is about 45 to 50 years old."

Based on information they gathered later, Laval police came to believe the "uncle" to whom the informant referred was Parasiris, who lived in Brossard, then a borough of Longueuil. Parasiris was 40 at the time.

(According to evidence presented at Parasiris's bail hearing, Mavroudis is his godson.)

The investigation gradually uncovered four other drug traffickers who appeared to be linked through Mavroudis.

A little more than a month after getting the tip, Leblanc gathered enough information to send a plainclothes police officer to buy drugs from the dealers. When the officer called one of the dealers, he arranged to meet her outside Le Skratch, on Curé Labelle Blvd. Hours later, she bought a half-gram of cocaine from a man who turned out to be Mavroudis.

By Oct. 25, 2006, after making several small cocaine purchases from Mavroudis and other dealers he sent to her, the same undercover officer began asking for larger quantities of cocaine. Laval investigators did this with the goal of finding out where the dealers kept their stash of cocaine.

Weeks later, Parasiris's name came up for the first time in the investigation. Nikolaos Xanthis, one of the drug dealers to whom Laval police were paying particular attention, was pulled over in Longueuil for speeding. The car he was driving, a Pontiac Grand Prix, was registered to Parasiris. Leblanc checked to see if Parasiris had a criminal record and found nothing.

One week later, Laval police investigators conducting surveillance on Xanthis followed him to an apartment in a duplex on Broadway St. in Brossard. No one appeared to live at the address. Laval police believed they had finally found the location where the dealers hid their cocaine.

While it was relatively close to Parasiris's home, the Brossard apartment still didn't link him to the drug dealers, who were all Laval residents.

The first link didn't come until Feb. 13, 2007, when investigators were following Xanthis while he was driving around and appeared to be making small drug deals.

While running errands, he stopped at Golf-O-Max, a club in Dorval where patrons practise their swings on golf simulators. It's housed in the same building as a bar, and both businesses were part-owned by Parasiris.

Police watched as Xanthis headed to an office inside Golf-O-Max and then appeared to sell drugs to customers.

After leaving the Dorval club, Xanthis travelled to the apartment on Broadway St. in Brossard. He went inside, came out a minute later, then headed for Parasiris's home on Rimouski Cres., where he stayed for about 30 minutes before returning again to the apartment.

Then, on Feb. 27, 2007, while Laval police morality-drug investigators followed, Xanthis travelled from his home in Laval to the apartment on Broadway St. While he was inside, an individual who appeared to be Basil Parasiris showed up in a car registered to Parasiris's wife, Penny Gounis.

Laval police never clearly established it was Parasiris who showed up.

A day after Parasiris appeared to have been spotted at the apartment on Broadway, Leblanc did an analysis of a beacon device that had been secretly placed on a BMW Mavroudis used to make drug deals. The device indicated Mavroudis was near Parasiris's home on Rimouski Cres. 10 times between Dec. 6, 2006, and Feb. 1, 2007. The BMW had also been to the Golf-O-Max in Dorval twice during the same period.

On the same day Leblanc did the analysis on the beacon, he received another tip from Montreal police. Citing an anonymous source, a Montreal police organized crime investigator said a man named Bill (the name Parasiris goes by), the owner of the Golf-O-Max in Dorval, was tied to cocaine trafficking.

The anonymous tipster said "Bill" sold marijuana and cocaine at the Golf-O-Max. The same tipster also supplied a cellphone number that turned out to be registered to Kosta Katsiouleris, one of the drug dealers Laval police were already investigating.

Using those bits of information, Laval police decided to include Parasiris's home as a place they wanted to search when they planned to carry out their operation targeting the other five drug dealers. They initially believed they would find a large quantity of drugs inside the apartment on Broadway St. and planned to conduct a dynamic entry there.

They also originally planned to go to Parasiris's home with a standard search warrant.

During Parasiris's bail hearing in 2007, a Sûreté du Québec investigator said Laval police changed their plans out of fear someone living in the Broadway St. duplex would hear them break down the door at 5 a.m. and tip off people whose homes would be searched an hour later.

Laval police decided to ask permission to use a dynamic entry at Parasiris's home instead. Leblanc managed to persuade the justice of the peace to approve the warrant even though Leblanc had no evidence Parasiris kept drugs inside his home.

That's the main reason the warrant and evidence resulting from it were tossed out before Parasiris's murder trial.

During a pretrial hearing, members of the Laval police morality-drug squad tried to explain why they suddenly wanted to raid Parasiris's home, using a dynamic entry. But in his written decision, Cournoyer described their reasoning as "incomprehensible."

"The use of force was not justified under the circumstances because the case did not establish that a (regular search warrant) would bring about the loss or imminent destruction of evidence," the judge stated in his decision.

Cournoyer also noted the police had no direct evidence Parasiris either supplied drugs to Xanthis or Mavroudis or that he stored drugs inside his home.

"The (affidavit) did nothing but establish the existence of contacts (visits to homes, businesses and telephone calls) between drug traffickers and Mr. Parasiris in circumstances that did not establish the reasonable probability that Mr. Parasiris is implicated in drug trafficking and was supplying Mr. Xanthis and/or Mavroudis," Cournoyer wrote.

Parasiris also faces eight weapons-related charges, including the illegal possession of three firearms.


I can see why the cops want his ass. I'd want it too since I have NO use for father's who sell drugs outta there homes in front of their kids. What a piece of shit this guy sounds like....
 
A common tactic used by drug dealers here is to keep drugs in the house.

One case I worked on a long time ago involved drug dealers cooking crack cocaine out in the open, in the kitchen, with children present. When the cops raided the home a fuss was created afterwards because there were children present and the cops took a lot of heat by the NAACP and the press because of it.

IMO in such a situation, if the person is dealing drugs, they should know better than to keep children in the home.

When you sell drugs it is reasonably foreseeable that the cops will raid your home. In this case, he may have an argument of self-defense but it will all boil down to the facts and based on what I have read it is not self-defense.

1) Police officers who testified say they repeatedly yelled "police" as they ran up the stairs towards Parasiris's bedroom. This legally puts him on notice that his house is being raided. Shooting after this is no justifiable.

2) The defendant contradicted himself in his testimony.

3) Only one gun in the defendants possession was legal.

From my experience, criminals always contradict themselves. They make up a story and cannot stick to it. That is a major common mistake they made.

IMO drug dealers need to be shot. Drugs have ruined the lives of many of my friends and I see no reason to support such an individual. Not only has this man sold dugs he also killed an innocent cop. I wonder how his wife and children feel? He is gone forever and this prick will either get off or serve a light sentence and be back on the streets ruining more lives.

Funny how these articles focus on the "innocent" drug dealer yet fail to address the pain and suffering his victims have gone through and the pain and suffering the poor cops family has gone through.
 
vixensghost said:
So, they never found any coke in his house?

If they found coke, I say hang him. IF he's dealing coke outta his house WITH his kids in there; he really has no rights and should be kicked in the head for doing that shit around his kids and putting them in harms way.

IF he is ONLY suspected of dealing coke and they found none, he had every right to protect his family IMHO.

It's THAT black and white to me. ^^^ Even if the guy WAS a drug dealer but the cops weren't bright enough to get this guy where he was dirty then as fucked up as it may sound, I say he should get off for self-defense.

The law is supposed to be based on evidence, not destroy peoples' lives based on *maybe*.... Of course, that is how *it should be*.... and then there are the way that things REALLY ARE.
 
AVet, that is an interesting perspective, and I see your point

I don't view drug dealers as scum, I think my government who owns and operates all the liquor stores are worse than drug dealers since more people die from drinking than doing blow or weed.

I think drug dealers are entitled to make a living just as much as the government who sells booze and lottery tickets
 
blueta2 said:
AVet, that is an interesting perspective, and I see your point

I don't view drug dealers as scum, I think my government who owns and operates all the liquor stores are worse than drug dealers since more people die from drinking than doing blow or weed.

I think drug dealers are entitled to make a living just as much as the government who sells booze and lottery tickets

That is an extremely radical point of view, one that I never would have assigned to you.

Go Blue!

I dont know if I necessarily agree w/you but you do give the rest of us some food for thought.
 
vixensghost said:
I can see why the cops want his ass. I'd want it too since I have NO use for father's who sell drugs outta there homes in front of their kids. What a piece of shit this guy sounds like....

G, question, is this guy any different than a guy who drinks in front of his kids every night? What if a guy is selling illegal booze out his house and his kids know his deal. Is that just as wrong?
 
BIKINIMOM said:
That is an extremely radical point of view, one that I never would have assigned to you.

Go Blue!

I dont know if I necessarily agree w/you but you do give the rest of us some food for thought.

The suicide rate amongst gamblers is sky rocketing.
Next to every goverment owned slot machine here in Quebec, they have a hotline you can call if you're broke and suicidal.
 
Top Bottom