Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
RESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsRESEARCHSARMSUGFREAKeudomestic

Glycemic Index Info!!

Musmar

New member
by Tom Venuto

The glycemic index is a scale that measures how quickly carbohydrates are broken down into glucose. The original purpose of the glycemic index was to help diabetics keep their blood glucose under control. The glycemic index has recently attracted a lot of attention in the bodybuilding, fitness and weight loss world and is all the rage these days. Nary an issue of a fitness or bodybuilding mag is published without some reference to the glycemic index and diet books such as "The Zone," and "Sugarbusters" worship the index like some kind of idol. According to advocates of the glycemic index system, foods that are high on the scale such as rice cakes, carrots, potatoes, or grape juice are "unfavorable" and should be avoided because they are absorbed so rapidly and are therefore more likely to convert to fat. Instead, we are urged to consume carbohydrates that are low on the glycemic index such as black eye peas, oatmeal, peanuts, apples and beans.

While the glycemic index does have some useful applications, the flaw in stringently adhering to the glycemic index to dictate all your carb choices is that the index is based on carbohydrates being eaten by themselves in a fasted state. An effective fat-burning, muscle building diet is based on always combining carbs and protein together. When carbs are eaten in mixed meals that contain protein and some fat, the glycemic index loses some of its significance because the protein and fat slows the absorption of the carbohydrates. For example, mashed potatoes have a glycemic index near that of pure glucose, but combine the potatoes with a chicken breast and vegetables and the glycemic index of the entire meal is much lower than the potatoes by itself. Similarly, rice cakes have a very high glycemic index, but if you were to put a couple tablespoons of peanut butter on them, the fat would slow the absorption of the carbs, thereby lowering the glycemic index of the combination.

A far more important and relevant criteria for selecting carbs is whether they are natural or processed. To say that one should not eat natural foods like potatoes simply because they are high on the glycemic index is ridiculous. Potatoes are an outstanding source of starchy complex carbs. Eaten exactly as it is found in nature, an 8 oz potato has only 170 calories, almost no fat, is loaded with essential nutrients and is satisfying to eat. Compare that to 8 oz of a processed carb such as pasta, which has 840 calories. Which do you think is the better choice if you want to get ripped?

About the author

Tom Venuto is a lifetime natural bodybuilder, personal trainer, gym owner, freelance writer and author of "Burn the Fat, Feed The Muscle" (BFFM): Fat Burning Secrets of the World's Best Bodybuilders and Fitness Models. Tom has written over 150 articles and has been featured in IRONMAN magazine, Natural Bodybuilding, Muscular Development, Muscle-Zine, Exercise for Men and Men’s Exercise. His inspiring and informative bodybuilding, fitness and weight loss articles are featured regularly on literally dozens of websites worldwide.

You can check out Tom's BFFM book here:
BURN THE FAT
 
Good post. People need to realize that not all sugars are bad and not all complex carbs are good. It really doesnt have much to do with that at all. GI is what dictates what is a good carb and what is a bad carb.
 
GL

Recently I read about the Glycemic load which seems to have much more practical application. Carrots for instance have a high GI but to get a high insulin response even eating them alone you have to eat a ton. The Glycemic load is the GI per serving, Another thing I think people get stuck on is that even if they ate a high glycemic food and EVERY calorie of it turned to fat they would still not be getting a whole ton of fat it can only possibly produce as much fat as its calories allow for. But the fact is not every carb is going to turn into fat. Its still all in the calories eat to many you have excess eat to few and even if every single calorie you ate magically turned to fat you'll lose weight. The more carbs eating the higher the insulin level in the blood and the less fat burned on a calorie to calorie ratio and the more carbs burned, but if you stay within your caloric limit if even 90% of each cal you burn is somehow carbs your still fine. The trouble is spiking your insulin makes u need more sugar and makes you hungry.
 
Carrots: http://www.mendosa.com/diabetes_update_14.htm#Carrots

The info you provided is well said. Now, brings up a valid question. Let's say I scarf down a baked potatoe (GI = 121), I eat a 4-6oz chicken breast and green peas (GI = 68). What will this come out to in terms of the GI of the meal. He said significantly lower. Is there a rough estimate on what it would be around? 80? 90?

Also, karma is well deserved. Unfortunately I'm still giving gray karma :( ...I'm almost at 50 karma points. I believe thats where gray turns into green. If anyone feels so inclined, hook a brother up and I will return the favor as soon as my color changes :p
 
Babyfaced Assassin said:
karma to u
btw have u read tom's book?
if so was it worth the $$$?

Sorry for the delayed response, i was away for a while :D

Anyway, yes, i've read Tom's book a few times since it was published and i's definately worth the $$. Much more informative and simple than any other fat loss resource i've come across.
 
Top Bottom