TC2 said:
Better as in no real skill ver. a trained fighter.
If the boxer has even a little skill, he'll take the kids nose off before the kid can even get his hands on him.
you guys keep lookin at this like tempest2003 is a trained ground fighter, if he was I would'nt be arguing for the boxer.
no one is arguing that a trained boxer will mostly likely win against an untrained "joe", if boxing. although my brother never had one ounce of training in anything and he managed to beat the living hell out of everyone he just about ever fought, from bigger guys to trained huys, it didnt matter. he was simply a very good natural fighter.
all anyone has pointed out is that tempest must go for his weakest spot. now most boxers are not in the gym grappeling and working on getting punching power from the ground. so it only makes sense that the weakest area would be the ground. were not saying his weak area is shitty, but for all we know he may not be that good of a boxer.
no one is arguing that tempest wont get demolished on the ground, we are simply saying that is probably the boxers weakest area. we already know tempest doesnt stand a chance on his feet.
your argument seems to be that as a boxer this guy has no waek area.
you dont know how he would react if tempest took him to the ground and put a choke hold and cut his airway off.
he only said he had some boxing training, you argue because of that he must be good on the ground.
id still go with the ground if it was a boxer.