Eating Meat is what made us Humans

[javaguru]

Why don't y'all continue your debate at the forum on curiousmales.com?

You looking for a hookup with BB?

 

[Richard_D_Feynman]

You can't bait me to reduce myself to your level BB....just sayin'.

My level is above a religion/belief system based on frog-eating. lol, your explanation of brain evolution is has as much evidence as some deity walking on water, you'd make a great prosecutor at the Scopes trial against men/hominids deriving from monkeys. Goddam evolutionists and their monkey science lol
Evidence greater than hypotheses or religion

 

[javaguru]

My level is above a religion/belief system based on frog-eating. lol, your explanation of brain evolution is has as much evidence as some deity walking on water, you'd make a great prosecutor at the Scope trial againt men/hominids deriving from monkeys. Goddam evolutionists and their monkey science lol

Take it up with every biology department at every university....

 

[PICK3]

:rollseyes:

it's

you fag

 

[Richard_D_Feynman]

Take it up with every biology department at every university....

Believe in yourself, not some frog

 

[javaguru]

Believe in yourself, not some frog

Faith over science BB...of course...go listen to some Tony Robbins self-motivation tapes....

 

[Richard_D_Feynman]

Take it up with every biology department at every university....

you take it up with EVERY archaeology, evolution department at every university. Cranial capacity evolution is well documented and it's based on hominids eating more protein, in East Africa. That's where the fossils were found. Next you'll say that brain evolution evolved from eating McDonald's quarterpounders as a freshman studying biology 101 at your university in 1991

 

[PICK3]

I get excited when intellectuals debate.

Just sayin

 

[javaguru]

you take with EVERY archaeology, evolution department at every university. Cranial capacity evolution is well documented and it's based on hominids eating more protein, in East Africa. That's where the fossils were found. Next you'll say that brain evolution evolved from eating McDonald's quarterpounders as a freshman studying biology 101 at your university

Wait, how would you expect fossils to develop from creatures living on a beach shore millions of years ago? Fossilization is EXTREMELY rare....

"Fossilization is an exceptionally rare occurrence, because most components of formerly-living things tend to decompose relatively quickly following death. In order for an organism to be fossilized, the remains normally need to be covered by sediment as soon as possible. However there are exceptions to this, such as if an organism becomes frozen, desiccated, or comes to rest in an anoxic (oxygen-free) environment. There are several different types of fossils and fossilization processes.

Due to the combined effect of taphonomic processes and simple mathematical chance, fossilization tends to favor organisms with hard body parts, those that were widespread, and those that lived for a long time. On the other hand, it is very unusual to find fossils of small, soft bodied, geographically restricted and geologically ephemeral organisms, because of their relative rarity and low likelihood of preservation.

Larger specimens (macrofossils) are more often observed, dug up and displayed, although microscopic remains (microfossils) are actually far more common in the fossil record.

Some casual observers have been perplexed by the rarity of transitional species within the fossil record. The conventional explanation for this rarity was given by Darwin, who stated that "the extreme imperfection of the geological record," combined with the short duration and narrow geographical range of transitional species, made it unlikely that many such fossils would be found. Simply put, the conditions under which fossilization takes place are quite rare; and it is highly unlikely that any given organism will leave behind a fossil. Eldredge and Gould developed their theory of punctuated equilibrium in part to explain the pattern of stasis and sudden appearance in the fossil record."

 

[Richard_D_Feynman]

I get excited when intellectuals debate.

Just sayin

well for the record, I agree with him on most points, although the timeframes we disagree on, given fossil records. Genetic traceback evidence supports that fisheating (before mercury poisoning by industrial manufacturing changed the health of eating fish). He, or his biological Imam, has a meritous case, although, the limitations are, the evidence. I was merely asking him, to do the work for me to show me the evidence. I recommend eating fish as it is much healthier than meat for long term survival, for some unexplained reason. But, that was the point of his professor he pointed towards. To expand thought. I saw militant atheism under his name. Logic tends to point towards, all beliefs as simply religion. I couldnt resist the cross-comparison as I think about it as well.
We cannot prove the unprovable and a frog religion. If he could 'prove it'. I think that could make us some money down the road. I am not a big fan of pasta, too many carbs, or rastafarianism, too much smoking of pot. So how can we sell froginariasm and get us a yahct? There's got to be a business angle to all of this>
We'll have to dumb it down of course.
We'll sell toads, they are cheaper