Drums of War bangin' for Iran?

[Longhorn85]

So there is no war on terror, after all?

 

[Mavafanculo]

The "war on terror" is neccessary but exagerrated to scare the sheeple and congress into compliance and usurp more and more basic liberties. They are using it to expand the power of government as they never would have been able to do sans the "glavanizing event...".

then they apply the tools and powers that they said were needed to "fight the terrorists" and apply them against US citizens in everyday criminal cases. That was the intent all along.

and Iraq is a diversion in the neccessary war vs terrorists. nice conflation try, but that one's toast already.

 

[Longhorn85]

The "war on terror" is neccessary but exagerrated to scare the sheeple and congress into compliance and usurp more and more basic liberties. They are using it to expand the power of government as they never would have been able to do sans the "glavanizing event...".

then they apply the tools and powers that they said were needed to "fight the terrorists" and apply them against US citizens in everyday criminal cases. That was the intent all along.

and Iraq is a diversion in the neccessary war vs terrorists. nice conflation try, but that one's toast already.

You have quotations, but you don't give a source.

Do you agree or not agree that we are engaged in a war vs global terrorism, and that Al Queida is the main threat in this war?

 

[Mavafanculo]

You have quotations, but you don't give a source.

Do you agree or not agree that we are engaged in a war vs global terrorism, and that Al Queida is the main threat in this war?

didnt you learn your lesson about questioning my quotes ? I guess not.
the "galvanizing event" quote is something you should be very familiar with.

"war" on terror yes, just like there is a war against narco trafficers, murderers, polluters. The Intel Reports indicate "al queda" has been strengthened by our involvement in iraq. They use it as a recruiting tool. We've created a new generation of terrorists who have a burning hatred of the US. Good job bushman.

look it up cheech.

 

[bw1]

The "war on terror" is neccessary but exagerrated to scare the sheeple and congress into compliance and usurp more and more basic liberties. They are using it to expand the power of government as they never would have been able to do sans the "glavanizing event...".

then they apply the tools and powers that they said were needed to "fight the terrorists" and apply them against US citizens in everyday criminal cases. That was the intent all along.

and Iraq is a diversion in the neccessary war vs terrorists. nice conflation try, but that one's toast already.

1) Exaggerated...9/11 I remember, oh but of course we "deserved" it according to the "radical left" Put up the list of terrorist attacks against the US...do we need to?

2) Yep, Bush wants to attack and prosecute innocent "citizens".

3) Toast already..pass that along to the troops and their families. I think the will give you a different outlook to what's really going on there. If any one thinks the US military "can't" win in combat, their "mis guided". Funny how the left says "if we win in Iraq it's bad for us politically". Go terrorist

4) Iraqi terrorist, oh wait that's right there are no "Iraqi" terrorists, "nice" fellas", have been found trying to cross the Mexican border into the US.

Talk about putting your head in the sand. Mav your a smart guy and at least can argue your side intelligently without the normal name calling. But, let's face the facts, we are in a war with Radical Islamic's who want to KILL Americans period. We need to stop them, we need to hit them hard. All they understand is force and their going to get it.

 

[Longhorn85]

"war" on terror yes

Glad we are in agreement on that. Now, let's allow the branch of govt responsible for the execution of wars to do their job.


For those playing along at home, that would be the Executive Branch.

 

[bw1]

didnt you learn your lesson about questioning my quotes ? I guess not.
the "galvanizing event" quote is something you should be very familiar with.

"war" on terror yes, just like there is a war against narco trafficers, murderers, polluters. The Intel Reports indicate "al queda" has been strengthened by our involvement in iraq. They use it as a recruiting tool. We've created a new generation of terrorists who have a burning hatred of the US. Good job bushman.

look it up cheech.

Yes, let's not make them mad, they will attack us. Screw that pacifist BS. maybe a group hug? Intel reports, funny what happens when the "intel" reports claim we are winning this war? or, do we just pick and choose which reports we want to beleive for political purposes.

 

[AAP]

So there is no war on terror, after all?

That would require terrorists, no?

Which were not in Iraqi before we got there. Where did Iraqi terrorists attack us? I must have missed that one.

 

[AAP]

Glad we are in agreement on that. Now, let's allow the branch of govt responsible for the execution of wars to do their job.


For those playing along at home, that would be the Executive Branch.

And for those still being played along... the Executive Branch hasn't done a very good job yet.

Oh wait... they are now attempting to do just what they were advised to do years ago at the start, but declined to do so.... Welcome to 2003 all over again.

 

[AAP]

1) Exaggerated...9/11 I remember, oh but of course we "deserved" it according to the "radical left"

Actually, Falwell and Phelps are Republican conservatives. That was their mantra. That we deserved 9-11.