DOES a man's slary matter??

[jd_uk]

LOL Who said that?

Baby that is on YOU. Those words did not come from MY mouth.

You did not say it as such but the inference is there:

1. "I dont date losers and this makes me a gold-digger?"

2. "they might prefer the company lowlife simpletons"

Maybe i'm wrong and maybe you don't really think this... but if i am then you have a serious weakness with words.

Similarly, with the success=money issue. The way that you and your husband have completely failed to see how this is not always true is another indicator of your character's. From this thread alone, i'd say that you do make a good couple...but i wouldn't particularly want to spend my time with you, as i'm sure you wouldn't with me.

 

[Bikini Mod]

You did not say it as such but the inference is there:

1. "I dont date losers and this makes me a gold-digger?"

2. "they might prefer the company lowlife simpletons"

Maybe i'm wrong and maybe you don't really think this... but if i am then you have a serious weakness with words.

Similarly, with the success=money issue. The way that you and your husband have completely failed to see how this is not always true is another indicator of your character's. From this thread alone, i'd say that you do make a good couple...but i wouldn't particularly want to spend my time with you, as i'm sure you wouldn't with me.

LOL

I merely said that the thread mystified me as to why other people care whom those people want to be with.

If your preference is to date only women that are stunningly beautiful, good for you.

If your preference is to date only women who have no children from previous relationships, good for you.

If your preference is to date women who have never been married before, then good for you.

Does that mean that I think this means that ALL OTHER WOMEN who are only "pretty" at best, have any number of children and whom have been married before are not desirable?.... thereby calling you an ASSHOLE (because I dont fit any of YOUR criteria?).

Hehehehehehheheheeeee

See, my self-esteem is well intact and I dont feel personally attacked because I may or may not fit YOUR criteria in who you do or do not find desirable when choosing a perspective mate. You are free to choose as is everyone else.

I am still trying to understand why it is that YOU feel personally attacked because YOU may or may not fit the criteria of who I do or do not find desirable when choosing a perspective mate. <---- THAT is what mystifies me.

 

[jd_uk]

LOL

I merely said that the thread mystified me as to why other people care whom those people want to be with.

If your preference is to date only women that are stunningly beautiful, good for you.

If your preference is to date only women who have no children from previous relationships, good for you.

If your preference is to date women who have never been married before, then good for you.

Does that mean that I think this means that ALL OTHER WOMEN who are only "pretty" at best, have any number of children and whom have been married before are not desirable?.... thereby calling you an ASSHOLE (because I dont fit any of YOUR criteria?).

Hehehehehehheheheeeee

See, my self-esteem is well intact and I dont feel personally attacked because I may or may not fit YOUR criteria in who you do or do not find desirable when choosing a perspective mate. You are free to choose as is everyone else.

I am still trying to understand why it is that YOU feel personally attacked because YOU may or may not fit the criteria of who I do or do not find desirable when choosing a perspective mate. <---- THAT is what mystifies me.

????? Jeez listen to yourself.

The girl that i am with is the person taht i get on best with in this world. That is my reason for being with her. You don't need to worry about me feeling personally attacked and i'm quite aware that you do not.

BM, i'll be frank, you are a master of talking absolute rubbish when you have any quality reply. I'm siding with the people on EF who have given you such a hard time...i think you do have some 'problems'.

 

[Bikini Mod]

????? Jeez listen to yourself.

The girl that i am with is the person taht i get on best with in this world. That is my reason for being with her. You don't need to worry about me feeling personally attacked and i'm quite aware that you do not.

BM, i'll be frank, you are a master of talking absolute rubbish when you have no quality reply. I'm siding with the people on EF who have given you such a hard time...i think you do have some 'problems'.

LOL

I have "problems" because YOU can't read. *wink*

If you were so happy in your relationship then you would give a fat rat's ass about my dating criteria.

I never onced downed or degraded anyone. Scroll back and read slowly.

 

[jd_uk]

LOL

I have "problems" because YOU can't read. *wink*

If you were so happy in your relationship then you would give a fat rat's ass about my dating criteria.

I never onced downed or degraded anyone. Scroll back and read slowly.

Last time i checked this was an open forum and the question was an open one to which i gave my reply. Last time i checked you also couldn't provide an answer to my posts so had to suggest that i felt both personally attacked and was not happy in my own relationship. Are you still getting that counselling or has it stopped? Many months ago i sugested that you seek someone better and i stand by that now.

 

[Grumpy Old Man]

Naaa... you can quantify up-front costs on a "wealth discriminating" person, but it's the maintenance fees that can kill you. Perspectives between a perk and an entitlement vary wildly.

And the vast majority of hidden costs aren't monetary.

All the ongoing costs have to be factored to include any extraordinary costs, eg. new foreign sports car to make it to the spa faster. When there is an offsetting positive balance eg. saving 30k a month at gentlemans clubs you see where the value increases and the expenses become inconsequential.

Currently I am researching the 5000 mile engine out service for the 355F1 vs getting her a new one. That might be the only hairball. Foreign car services have really taken a bite out of my weekly salary as of late. But if she can shop faster perhaps a faster car would be in order; another compensating balance. So as I stated previously, ya get what ya pay for.

 

[gotmilk]

My Slary curves to the right slightly

 

[Bikini Mod]

Last time i checked this was an open forum and the question was an open one to which i gave my reply. Last time i checked you also couldn't provide an answer to my posts so had to suggest that i felt both personally attacked and was not happy in my own relationship. Are you still getting that counselling or has it stopped? Many months ago i sugested that you seek someone better and i stand by that now.

OMG you are so funny.

Yea, it's an open forum. You put words into my mouth then get pissed at me for them? But I am the one that "needs help"?

 

[Bikini Mod]

My Slary curves to the right slightly

BEST POST EVER!!!

 

[gotmilk]

All the ongoing costs have to be factored to include any extraordinary costs, eg. new foreign sports car to make it to the spa faster. When there is an offsetting positive balance eg. saving 30k a month at gentlemans clubs you see where the value increases and the expenses become inconsequential.

Currently I am researching the 5000 mile engine out service for the 355F1 vs getting her a new one. That might be the only hairball. Foreign car services have really taken a bite out of my weekly salary as of late. But if she can shop faster perhaps a faster car would be in order; another compensating balance. So as I stated previously, ya get what ya pay for.

Why don't you roll your oil play into a pink sheet trading shell....and then load up on foreign cars as corporate vehicles.