spatts said:
Depends on what you eat...I think his overall intake should be below BMR, but that it should be achieved through burning them off, not starving.
Epi, when did you cut last, and how did you do it?
Ahh, trying to bring me into huh? Would you like a bunch of links and reliable citations on the proper way to cut? Below BMR, the MINIMUM calories your body needs to function? Do you sit around the house all day? Doubtful many people do. Check out that site, enter in your activities.
Or do you doubt the
American College of Sports Medicine? It is their recomendation after all. I only repeat it.
I cut 1lb a week, I lost no strength in my cutting phase, but I only went from ~18% to 12% BF.
1lb a week is 500 calories a day less than MAINTENENCE. NOT BMR.
I burn 3500 calories a day, that is my Maintenence, on the days I work, only 2800 calories on weekends. Dropping to my BMR is stupid, and I am appalled that you would suggest it. Do you think BigRed sits around all day? (the only justification for going below BMR)
How the hell is he supposed to get the energy to run on the treadmill, lift weights, go to work, walk up stairs, walk to the car, drive, etc if he isn't taking in enough energy?
No, the body doesn't compensate by burning all the fat- Your body becomes lethargic, brain function slows, and muscle mass is tapped into. Not something a bodybuilder nor a powerlifter wants. Some fat is burned, but the body will go into an emergency mode, and will CONSERVE your energy rather than burn it off. Hence the lack of motivation to keep moving.
And then when you waste away, and your muscles are all atrophied, and you think you are happy with your weight, you start increasing your calories, guess where it gets stored? AS FAT, why? because you starved it for 6+ weeks previously and it is still scared of it repeating. Evolutionary advantage.
This is all stuff I have seen you telling newbies, almost word for word, so why spatts are you doubting me? Is it you are holding a grudge of some sort?