Re: Critically acclaimed Uncharted 2 will lose out game of the year to Modern Warfare
Yeah they had to stick with it. Now that everyone's getting comfortable with it and it's cost efficient it won't matter as much. Most programmers now admit it's easier than the PS2 ever was, just more time consuming because it's more multi-threaded. The only other thing they could do is go to a CPU like in the 360, but I don't think they've ever done that. I think it's partically an eccentric attitude and partially protecting themselves against piracy. Still though, even though piracy is pretty common on the 360 it's blockbusters are still hands down outselling the PS3 counterparts.
I have a feeling Microsoft will give a sneak peak at their next console at E3 '10. If they get their quality control locked down this time they could have a monster waiting to be let off its leash.
that was a pretty good vid on the cell processor. God that thing has to be a mother fucker to program for. Even though I can't stand those 3rd person platformers, I have to admit that visually uncharted has some sick looks. Killzone still doesn't impress me though, looks too washed out. Whenever there's a still shot, looks like a painting. FPS's are my nigga's and so far from what i've seen the PS3 hasn't seperated itself from the 360. What's more is that sony is locked into the ps3 for at least another 4-5 years and we'll probably see the 360 successor in 3, "maybe" 2....but I doubt it unless some new manufacturing process if developed that severly cuts cost. Microsoft renewed their contract with AMD/ATI for the next machine, so the move from the 360 to the next machine will be effortless for the companies makeing 360 games now. It's just a better business model even if at the end of the console cycle Sony is getting more power from their machine. I read that sony has resigned themselves to using the same CPU in the next machine because developing a new one is going to cost too much and it gives developers a breather. No one wants to spend 4 years figuring out the cell and just as they do, they're hit with a new one. First smart thing I've heard sony do in a long time.
Yeah they had to stick with it. Now that everyone's getting comfortable with it and it's cost efficient it won't matter as much. Most programmers now admit it's easier than the PS2 ever was, just more time consuming because it's more multi-threaded. The only other thing they could do is go to a CPU like in the 360, but I don't think they've ever done that. I think it's partically an eccentric attitude and partially protecting themselves against piracy. Still though, even though piracy is pretty common on the 360 it's blockbusters are still hands down outselling the PS3 counterparts.
I have a feeling Microsoft will give a sneak peak at their next console at E3 '10. If they get their quality control locked down this time they could have a monster waiting to be let off its leash.