Computer generated kiddie porn... wtf is going on here?

[str8manwithadickinhisass]

How many movies have depicted adult actors that were playing the part of teenagers and included sex scenes? Under this vaguely worded law these films would be considered child porn. Should we arrest people and call them pedophiles for owning a copy of "Fast Times at Ridgemont High"?

 

[Lao Tzu]

bump

 

[Burning_Inside]

But what about the person who just gets off on the images, but is no threat to anyone? Perverted? Of course. Criminal? Depends. If they're viewing pictures of real sexual acts of minors, yes, that is criminal.

Sad ass times we live in where looking at something makes you a criminal.

 

[Lao Tzu]

Sad ass times we live in where looking at something makes you a criminal.

100 years from now, if/when we can read people's thoughts from a distance using technology, it will probably become illegal to think these things too.

 

[Burning_Inside]

What is that movie with Tom Cruise in it? the one where the goverment can arrest you for "future murders"?

MInority report..Looks like an awesome movie, and some scary theories.

"Hi, we're here to stone you to death because 5 years from now you will be surfing the net and a banner ad portaining to kiddie porn will appear on your screen and you will look at it for approximately .05 seconds. You are hereby sentenced to death you scumbag".

 

[magdelana]

YES LOOKING AT THAT KIND OF SHIT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IF your are talking about 16 yo girls having concentual seks with men, thats may be oke, but watching cartoons or what the fuck of little girls having seks with grown men is wrong.

The pedophiles say pedo phile, child love, it means we love kinderen, not just want seks from them. WRONG!!!
Know what it is like to be 8 and have a grown man fucking you?? Here suck my cock little lady, o yes such fun thanks sir! Mmmm.....she is 10 now, is that old enougth to have it up the ass? O sure why not?

O just drawings or computer made fotos makes it fine? No it is true that no actually childeren get fucked, but it STILL encourages the pedo to want it and OTHER childeren will have to give it to them.

 

[Burning_Inside]

YES LOOKING AT THAT KIND OF SHIT SHOULD BE ILLEGAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

YOURE A FOOL.

IF your are talking about 16 yo girls having concentual seks with men, thats may be oke, but watching cartoons or what the fuck of little girls having seks with grown men is wrong.Oh, so it's ok to do it but not look at it..

The pedophiles say pedo phile, child love, it means we love kinderen, not just want seks from them. WRONG!!!
Know what it is like to be 8 and have a grown man fucking you?? Here suck my cock little lady, o yes such fun thanks sir! Mmmm.....she is 10 now, is that old enougth to have it up the ass? O sure why not? if ya wanna get technical, just because you love something doesn't mean you have sexual urges towards it.

O just drawings or computer made fotos makes it fine? No it is true that no actually childeren get fucked, but it STILL encourages the pedo to want it and OTHER childeren will have to give it to them.

Since when is it, or should it be illegal to want something. It's when the want becomes an action that it's a problem. It's your right as a living breathing entity to want, and to be able to see things. No one should have the right to take these things away from you as wanting something and seeing something does no harm to anyone. You start dictating where and how basic human functions can be applied, you're really blurring the lines of freedom of being a human. For example. We are all human with the want to kill arising sometimes in our lives. Do we do it? Most of the time no, we don't act upon it, cause we realize it's not worth it, and if you have respect for another human, you will realize it's wrong. Also, should it be illegal to view pictures of people smoking marijuana, or look at pictures OF marijuana, or should it be illegal for instance to even view crime scene death photos or videos?

 

[magdelana]

you start dictating where and how basic human functions can be applied, you're really blurring the lines of freedom of being a human.

I am VERY much supporting human rights. They must be protected for everyone or no one. All adults and all children.

If you did not notice i am a woman. I am speaking from expereince on this subject. I can tell you as certain that looking at fotos of nude childeren is where it begans.

IF your are talking about 16 yo girls having concentual seks with men, thats may be oke, but watching cartoons or what the fuck of little girls having seks with grown men is wrong.Oh, so it's ok to do it but not look at it..

You misunderstand this paragraph. English is not my mother tongue, i was not clear with this. I was comparing the difference in ages of the girls involved. When i said little girls i meant prepuberty, 6-11 yo girls. I didnt want seks at this age, but i got it anyway. Quite a bit of it actually. Making the choice to have seks at 16 can be quite different then age 6.


Think of this for a while before you consider your opinion on this matter again:
would you still be making the same sort of argument if you had experience what i have experenced? Do you think you could still say that adults should have the right to even LOOK at such things? or even drawings or them?

Also you mix your arument with examples that include acts where only the person making the choice may be affected, like drug use. I am from Holland where the ideas of drug use is rather dif then amerika. I think they should all be legal. Getting stoned off your ass in your home is your right. It is your body and your life. However, if you are now driving and stoned it is now a public matter and is a different thing.

Not all who see the fotos turn out fucking children, but some do. Seeing the fotos make the desire much worse, it feeds it. It inceases the number of men who actually go and do it. And the populairity of the fotos encourage the pedos to keep fucking children and making more fotos.

When i mention that pedos say they love children i did not explain that this is the reason they give that it is oke for them to fuck them also. I did not mean that they ONLY love them. No certainly i would not say that love of someone also means a seks desire.

My first post was a very big emotional response. This topic was on something very personal for me and i was angry and did not explain my opionions very well.

 

[Lao Tzu]

I am VERY much supporting human rights. They must be protected for everyone or no one. All adults and all children.

If you did not notice i am a woman. I am speaking from expereince on this subject. I can tell you as certain that looking at fotos of nude childeren is where it begans.



You misunderstand this paragraph. English is not my mother tongue, i was not clear with this. I was comparing the difference in ages of the girls involved. When i said little girls i meant prepuberty, 6-11 yo girls. I didnt want seks at this age, but i got it anyway. Quite a bit of it actually. Making the choice to have seks at 16 can be quite different then age 6.


Think of this for a while before you consider your opinion on this matter again:
would you still be making the same sort of argument if you had experience what i have experenced? Do you think you could still say that adults should have the right to even LOOK at such things? or even drawings or them?

Also you mix your arument with examples that include acts where only the person making the choice may be affected, like drug use. I am from Holland where the ideas of drug use is rather dif then amerika. I think they should all be legal. Getting stoned off your ass in your home is your right. It is your body and your life. However, if you are now driving and stoned it is now a public matter and is a different thing.

Not all who see the fotos turn out fucking children, but some do. Seeing the fotos make the desire much worse, it feeds it. It inceases the number of men who actually go and do it. And the populairity of the fotos encourage the pedos to keep fucking children and making more fotos.

When i mention that pedos say they love children i did not explain that this is the reason they give that it is oke for them to fuck them also. I did not mean that they ONLY love them. No certainly i would not say that love of someone also means a seks desire.

My first post was a very big emotional response. This topic was on something very personal for me and i was angry and did not explain my opionions very well.

If there is evidence that viewing child pornography leads to commission of molestation acts, then that may fall under a type of 'clear & present danger' law. But there really isn't. And not letting people view child porn isn't going to make them stop being pedophiles.

Really though, victims trying to deal with their pain & rage probably shouldn't dictate criminal law. That is what we do in america, and we have both the highest crime rate & the highest imprisonment rate of any industrialized nation (i think). People who want to & know how to lower crime rates should dictate criminal law.

Anyway, everyone believes in freedom of speech when people agree with them but only a minority believe in it for views that they find offensive or evil. I have no rage or pain to change my view on this subject, and i'm sure i'd see it different if i did. But overall if people want to think things and use images to help them think then people shouldn't imprison them for it.

 

[G ChildlihC G]

Bottom line is it's sick and should be illegal, moreover people who are into that sh*t should be taken to Prison and gang raped by some fat cocked inmates.