Computer generated kiddie porn... wtf is going on here?

[Rockafella Skank]

Posted by huntmaster
We have to be able to draw the line somewhere--and I believe its time to draw the line.

The line HAS been drawn, as re-affirmed in this case.

 

[JohnnyO]

Not that I'm for child porn, but the law that banned virtual images also banned images implied to be children .. say like say Jenna Jamison in little catholic schoolgirl outfit giving head .. or a church production of a Nativity scene .. ( since it's generally agreed that Mary was around 14 when she gave birth to Jesus).

It just needs to be written better to bann the child porn, but allow artists who paint or photograph nudes or movie makers who produce films exploring teen-age sexuality using adult actors. Hell, "Scary Movie" would have been banned since those people were supposed to be in high school.

 

[bwood]

Pedophiles should be.........

Shit, there isn't a word for it that
truly expresses my feeling....

New Word(should be in next Webster's)

killmashsquashrendteargrindacidbathdestroy

with an IV so they dont die prematurely

 

[the nature boy]

you guys need to read news articles about this. keep in mind the courts are predominately conservative. The law presented before them wasn't written well.

read and learn if you're interested

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm.../20020417/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus_child_porn_13

 

[Lumberg]

Ok, wait.

In my experience most people that speak out against child porn are about saving children from expoitation. Meaning you don't want kids coerced into doing sexual things for the camera. Now there is technology that allows users to view child porn without that part that exploits minors. It actually sounds like a good solution to me. No children are being exploited by the people that are viewing this ersatz child porn.

And don't tell me that looking at this stuff is going to make people actually do it. Look at all the losers that use regular porn and never get laid.

JC

 

[Pimp C2]

Ok, wait.

In my experience most people that speak out against child porn are about saving children from expoitation. Meaning you don't want kids coerced into doing sexual things for the camera. Now there is technology that allows users to view child porn without that part that exploits minors. It actually sounds like a good solution to me. No children are being exploited by the people that are viewing this ersatz child porn.

And don't tell me that looking at this stuff is going to make people actually do it. Look at all the losers that use regular porn and never get laid.

JC

I can't help but to think that looking at this stuff would certainly increase the chances of these people actually living out the fantasy. The best way to solve the problem is to kill off all these sick fucks, I would be all for it, we could even start off with the priests that have recently been indicted.

 

[Robert Jan]

Perhaps its different since i live in europe where these things have been discussed scandalled, gruelled upon and shocking more in the open than in the us, but I dont think ANY kid porn should be allowed, no matter what its source.

I remember all the details, pictures, all the stories being dug up from marc dutroux (spell check)...... this shit is like beyond horrible and i believe that kid porn feeds a pedophile sexual preference to people who look at it for arousal.

I mean sure in theory no one is harmed but do we no longer have any honour whatsoever?

perhaps like it ll be celebrity kids who are especially considered good meat amongst them sickos and some kid will have the internet swarmed with pictures of himself salad tossing some other infant.

this shit is just too sick. legal tolerance is usually really my thing (as im dutch) but this is too much.

 

[Lumberg]

Ok, right now I'm just exploring the issue from the standpoint of, child porn will happen anyway, no matter how many people we lock up. If there's a way for it to exist that doesn't directly exploit children, why not allow it.

Kind of like, no one wants their kid to run around having sex. But we know they're going to do it anyway so you provide condoms so if they do it at least it's safe sex.

Same kind of philosophy for legalizing drugs.

JC

 

[huntmaster]

Kind of like, no one wants their kid to run around having sex. But we know they're going to do it anyway so you provide condoms so if they do it at least it's safe sex.

Same kind of philosophy for legalizing drugs.

JC

IMO, this is why kids are into so many things today, that we were not into years ago. b/c the adults are not willing to stick by what they say is right-----adults instead say one thing, yet do another.

this confuses the kids and makes them think that noone is real, and thus makes them think that everyone is doing it.

When individuals of influence stop handing out condoms and start sticking by what is right instead of using the copout that they are going to do it anyway, children will know right from wrong. Until then----I fear that we will remain in decline.

 

[the nature boy]

not handing out condoms isn't going to prevent kids from having sex. before it was standard practice to hand out condoms kids were still going at it. that's just how it goes.