Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
How to install the app on iOS

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.

Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

Casey Anthony defense: Caylee drowned in pool

Bullshit. Your baby drowns so you duct tape her mouth, keep her in your trunk for a month, then dump her body in the woods?

I'm not buying it.

it's called "reasonable doubt"...you don't have to "buy it"...you simply have to believe that it's possible.

for the record, i ain't buying it either...and, i'd make a really bad juror.
 
wtf is funny about that?

Idunno - the nature of how I read SL saying that in my mind was that he put a lot of thought into this theory and could conceivably consider it true. It's like he was 50/50 on her defense on something just barely tipped him over to the "I dont buy it" side.
 
Idunno - the nature of how I read SL saying that in my mind was that he put a lot of thought into this theory and could conceivably consider it true. It's like he was 50/50 on her defense on something just barely tipped him over to the "I dont buy it" side.

i just assumed that he was putting himself in a juror's shoes...and, in that case, that's the analysis and conclusion process...and, like i said, all the defense has to do is create reasonable doubt...if you say "the easter bunny did it", obviously that's not plausible...however, if you say "something bad happened, my dad helped me cover it up, i don't know why i acted the way i did afterward (drinking and partying), i guess i wasn't in my right mind (she's already got that one covered...slam dunk)"...that explanation is completely plausible...but, is it plausible enough to create reasonable doubt?? we'll see.
 
i just assumed that he was putting himself in a juror's shoes...and, in that case, that's the analysis and conclusion process...and, like i said, all the defense has to do is create reasonable doubt...if you say "the easter bunny did it", obviously that's not plausible...however, if you say "something bad happened, my dad helped me cover it up, i don't know why i acted the way i did afterward (drinking and partying), i guess i wasn't in my right mind (she's already got that one covered...slam dunk)"...that explanation is completely plausible...but, is it plausible enough to create reasonable doubt?? we'll see.

That is correct. At this point the defense is trying to get a 2nd degree manslaughter conviction which would be a 5 to 20 year sentence INSTEAD of the death penalty or life in prison for her. Just like you said , all they have to do is create reasonable doubt to achieve this.
 
Top Bottom