so?? I should write a letter to the sports med doc that both wrote the book and certified me regarding the information pertaining to muscle contraction and effects of supporting heavy weight with the skeletal and supportive systems rather than the muscles that are being used to move the weight??
See?? the same thing goes for benching.. whenever during a movement the plane of motion should never allow the muscle to release the contraction allowing for blood to flood the muscle, at the point where the muscle releases the contraction, thus releasing stress to the muscle the weight is still being moved and or supported.. if not by the muscle, then by the skeletal system..
but that's just his opinion, you've stated yours... I've trained both ways... currently using the afore mentioned information as a guide and am very happy with the results.. both in strength, growth, and recovery..
I'm sure your highschool, or college coach will be happy that you squat in that manner, perhaps when you are 48 yr old you'll still be able to do military press for reps at 315 lbs.. that's where i'm at right now.. but i don't do a lot of squats.. I prefer hip sled as it protects my back better..
see, a simple exchange of ideas.. wait, i supported my statements, you simply said they were wrong and stated the opposite..
you've trained both ways. So, you've locked out at the top of a bench press? Dunno about you, but I find it impossible to lockout with...oh, say 300 lbs., and NOT have my muscles still contracting to control the weight.
If someone were to lockout and manage to overcome their instincts and simply "release" their contracted muscles, that 300 lbs. is going to come crashing down on them. Believing otherwise is ridiculous.