Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Any Six Sigma black belts here...

that's an affirmative btw in case it's over your head.


:lmao:

As a test subject in the mental retardation study, possibly.

But it would not surprise me if you found another way to suckle the government tit past your student loans and hospital bills.
 
Working with the NSF one would think a person would see the value in siting peer reviewed articles when talking about science.

Outstanding catch! I didn't notice that first pass.

He prefers to cite articles filled with contractions, profanity and exclamation marks.

Perhaps it's all part of his double-sekrit identity.
 
Outstanding catch! I didn't notice that first pass.

He prefers to cite articles filled with contractions, profanity and exclamation marks.

Perhaps it's all part of his double-sekrit identity.

I'm knot that smart someone far smarter than I noticed and pointed out to me but I doubt he will post up. I do promise he's laughing at this thread ;)
 
You can add ISO as well to the list of industry standards...It's essential for any provider of products to be held accountable and an industry standard is always better than a government standard.
So if the meat industry decides pink slime or 40% lean beef meets their standard it should matter not that the gov't disagrees?
 
I'm knot that smart someone far smarter than I noticed and pointed out to me but I doubt he will post up. I do promise he's laughing at this thread ;)

The k-messages associated with these e-fights are always the best.

:)
 
So if the meat industry decides pink slime or 40% lean beef meets their standard it should matter not that the gov't disagrees?

Pink slime is already FDA/USDA approved, so it already meets all the required standards.
 
Pink slime is already FDA/USDA approved, so it already meets all the required standards.

Thanks for completely missing the point.
 
Thanks for completely missing the point.

No, I got the point. You missed the counterpoint: Industry already DID establish pink slime as a standard through FDA/USDA. The regulators are always in bed with the regulated.
 
No, I got the point. You missed the counterpoint: Industry already DID establish pink slime as a standard through FDA/USDA. The regulators are always in bed with the regulated.


I have a slightly different connotation of "pink slime"



just sayin'
 
As a test subject in the mental retardation study, possibly.

But it would not surprise me if you found another way to suckle the government tit past your student loans and hospital bills.


You realize you are maybe one of a handful of people on here who know right off the top of their head what the NSF even is right? Think about that. It's not exactly a common claim....and just to be clear the chemists and physicists are handling that relationship, i have nothing to do with the research side of the business so don't even bother asking cause i wouldn't talk about it even if I understood it. And honestly it's over your head as well as you're an EE.
 
So if the meat industry decides pink slime or 40% lean beef meets their standard it should matter not that the gov't disagrees?

These standards were developed to maintain quality while delivering the product as efficently as possible; I'll address brownbrown...My dad was one of the first MC guys that rode Harleys back in the late 1940's. Old joke, he always said a Harley rider was a Harley mechanic by definition because it was such a bad product...Good for Harley that theuy adopted something the auto industry embraced decades beforehand.

As far as "pink slime" is concerned...it's being defended by the secretary of agriculture....I've witnessed slaughter house operations first hand..."Pink slime" is the least of your concerns. :)
 
You realize you are maybe one of a handful of people on here who know right off the top of their head what the NSF even is right? Think about that. It's not exactly a common claim....and just to be clear the chemists and physicists are handling that relationship, i have nothing to do with the research side of the business so don't even bother asking cause i wouldn't talk about it even if I understood it. And honestly it's over your head as well as you're an EE.

Do you have any idea how corny your secret agent crap is getting?

It's funny when SB does it. It's just pathetic when you do it.

 
Do you have any idea how corny your secret agent crap is getting?


what secret agent crap omg lmfao. I talked back in 05-06 about coming back from CA to join a company started by family members. And i never made any bones that i wasn't part of the R&D...i was tommyboy running around doing sales work and making pitches to investors. It was the whole reason i went back to school for business. Nothing secret dude
 
Last edited:
what secret agent crap omg lmfao. I talked back in 05-06 about coming back from CA to join a company started by family members. And i never made any bones that i wasn't part of the R&D...i was tommyboy running around doing sales work and making pitches to investors. It was the whole reason i went back to school for business. Nothing secret dude

Oh I'm sure investors would line up left and right to bet on you. Was the opportunity super sekrit as well?

:rolleyes:
 
Oh I'm sure investors would line up left and right to bet on you. Was the opportunity super sekrit as well?

:rolleyes:

A) They did
B) They weren't betting on "me"

There's nothing super sekrit dude...unless your'e referring to the project going before the NSF in which case i'm sure you of all people fully understand why that's not to be talked about. What we were dealing in a few years ago was a polymerizing surface application. I gave presentations on that product to state govt agencies.
 
Oh do tell us more!

233314-condescending-wonka-creepy-wonka
 
Hahaha!

Damn. I've missed the fun working today. I'll be back tomorrow with a vengeance!
 
Top Bottom