Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

You want your drugs back? Vote Ron Paul!

Tweakle said:
A democratic congress would never repeal the anabolic androgenic steroids laws it passed. And if he won do you think he would be really be allowed to dismantle the huge organizations that exist only to swallow your tax dollars, with congress and his own party going against him all the time?

Well, that's the thing. He's the diametric opposite of conservative.
 
Tweakle said:
A democratic congress would never repeal the anabolic androgenic steroids laws it passed. And if he won do you think he would be really be allowed to dismantle the huge organizations that exist only to swallow your tax dollars, with congress and his own party going against him all the time?

And the better option to voting for him is....? Worst case scenario if elected he is a roadblock to the ever expanding central government.
 
Nelson Montana said:
Well, that's the thing. He's the diametric opposite of conservative.

He's not really the diametric opposite so much as a tangent. Some people look at Ron Paul and think that nobody in congress will work with him. I think that he has the philosophical basis that allows him to work with both parties. He is for personal liberties, much like the democrats claim. He is for shrinking government, much like republicans claim. The most difficult elements for him to work with would be Reaganite neo-conservatives and socialist leaning democrats.
 
there is no better alternative to him, if I were a US citizen I would be overjoyed that there's the chance to vote for him... but personal liberties aren't really on the Dem's agenda (Dems would take as many away from you as the social conservatives on the other side) and a shrinking government would make it harder for the social conservatives to poke into every aspect of your personal life.

Funny how he sweeps every online poll, but the media still totally ignores him and focuses on the candiates picked by Murdoch & co... the general public isn't going to educate themselves on the issues beyond what CNN or Fox show them.
 
Funny how he sweeps every online poll, but the media still totally ignores him and focuses on the candiates picked by Murdoch & co... the general public isn't going to educate themselves on the issues beyond what CNN or Fox show them.



Very sad :worried:
 
jaybois said:
Funny how he sweeps every online poll, but the media still totally ignores him and focuses on the candiates picked by Murdoch & co... the general public isn't going to educate themselves on the issues beyond what CNN or Fox show them.



Very sad :worried:


Isn't it funny how Paul supporters take the online polls and vote multiple times to skew the numbers, when he isn't even a third-tier blip in scientific polling. Whilst he has some good ideas, he isn't electable. Even with his foaming at the mouth fan base.
 
redguru said:
Isn't it funny how Paul supporters take the online polls and vote multiple times to skew the numbers, when he isn't even a third-tier blip in scientific polling. Whilst he has some good ideas, he isn't electable. Even with his foaming at the mouth fan base.
You sound like hannity.
 
redguru said:
LOL, Hannity couldn't hold my luggage.

LOL,I've voted for paul on about every online poll i've seen. where are all the these scentific poll's?
 
jaybois said:
LOL,I've voted for paul on about every online poll i've seen. where are all the these scentific poll's?

On-line polls cannot be considered since they are so easy to skew. Voting multiple times by masking ip, using multiple computers to vote, etc.... The only true way is by using the true polling data from Rasmussen and thier ilk where they randomly call likely voters.
 
Top Bottom