makedah
New member
Those of you who've been lifting longer than I have probably have much better perspective than I do on this.
I know that some machines help us do things that couldn't be otherwise done easily - like lat pulldowns for those of us that can't do pullups - or would be difficult to do without a cage or a spot. I'm thinking in particular of machines that seem to be redundant to free weight moves - like shoulder press or tricep extension machines.
I'm not trying to bash. My first time out lifting weights ('94-96) I used machines exclusively because that's what the gym folks steered me toward. I had no experience with free weights and I was afraid to go to the free weight room - I was intimidated by all those men! And my fitness magazines echoed this idea that machines were the best thing for me (of course, at least one of them is published by Weider!). But I know it's not just a gender thing. For one, there are men who seem to prefer the machines, too.
Is the preference for machines for moves like this because of the belief that machines are more effective or safer? Is it a technique issue - thinking that free weights are more complicated? (After all, the weight is just lying there, one has to know what to do with it.) Did something happen (I'm guessing in the 1980s) to make health clubs seem more upscale and necessary because they had "high tech" machines? And I'm guessing that if that's the case, gym personnel would lead people to think that they HAD to use the machines for results and therefore, HAD to have gym memberships.
Any thoughts?
I know that some machines help us do things that couldn't be otherwise done easily - like lat pulldowns for those of us that can't do pullups - or would be difficult to do without a cage or a spot. I'm thinking in particular of machines that seem to be redundant to free weight moves - like shoulder press or tricep extension machines.
I'm not trying to bash. My first time out lifting weights ('94-96) I used machines exclusively because that's what the gym folks steered me toward. I had no experience with free weights and I was afraid to go to the free weight room - I was intimidated by all those men! And my fitness magazines echoed this idea that machines were the best thing for me (of course, at least one of them is published by Weider!). But I know it's not just a gender thing. For one, there are men who seem to prefer the machines, too.
Is the preference for machines for moves like this because of the belief that machines are more effective or safer? Is it a technique issue - thinking that free weights are more complicated? (After all, the weight is just lying there, one has to know what to do with it.) Did something happen (I'm guessing in the 1980s) to make health clubs seem more upscale and necessary because they had "high tech" machines? And I'm guessing that if that's the case, gym personnel would lead people to think that they HAD to use the machines for results and therefore, HAD to have gym memberships.
Any thoughts?