why is prostitution illegal but being in porn is not?

[BMK792]

I also don't give a fuck if someone wants to pay for sex, millions of men do that legally everyday, its called dating.

+1

 

[javaguru]

prostitution= having sex for money and acting like you like it.

acting in pron= having sex for money in front of a camera and acting like you like it.

is it only legal if there's a camera?

http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/why-is-prostitution-illegal-but-pornography-is-not/

"The Court noted that for an act to constitute prostitution, “the genitals, buttocks, or female breast, of either the prostitute or the customer must come in contact with some part of the body of the other for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification of the customer or of the prostitute.” Id (citing People v. Hill (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 525, at 534-535). Since the payment of the acting fees was the only payment, there was no evidence that any payment was made for the purpose of sexual gratification.

Defendant, the payor, thus did not engage in either the requisite conduct nor did he have the requisite mens rea or purpose to establish procurement for purposes of prostitution. People v. Freeman

The First Amendment Issue

Even if defendant’s conduct could somehow be found to come within the definition of “prostitution” literally, the application of the pandering statute to the hiring of actors to perform in the production of a nonobscene motion picture would impinge unconstitutionally upon First Amendment values. People v. Freeman"

 

[chazk]

around here they call it a " prostate massage " and the chicks get away with it.

 

[chris350]

maybe because it can be justified that in porn they arent being paid to have sex they are just getting paid to be video taped.

 

[chris302001]

http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/why-is-prostitution-illegal-but-pornography-is-not/

"The Court noted that for an act to constitute prostitution, “the genitals, buttocks, or female breast, of either the prostitute or the customer must come in contact with some part of the body of the other for the purpose of sexual arousal or gratification of the customer or of the prostitute.” Id (citing People v. Hill (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 525, at 534-535). Since the payment of the acting fees was the only payment, there was no evidence that any payment was made for the purpose of sexual gratification.

Defendant, the payor, thus did not engage in either the requisite conduct nor did he have the requisite mens rea or purpose to establish procurement for purposes of prostitution. People v. Freeman

The First Amendment Issue

Even if defendant’s conduct could somehow be found to come within the definition of “prostitution” literally, the application of the pandering statute to the hiring of actors to perform in the production of a nonobscene motion picture would impinge unconstitutionally upon First Amendment values. People v. Freeman"

What if I rub my weiner on the tv screen? Still not close enough?

 

[redsamurai]

sales tax

^^^^Velvett is the shit^^^^^


Just another thing uncle sam will not let you do unless he can get hisself a cut....

It would be mighty difficult to regulate an interaction between a hooker and a john that meet somewhere in an alley. With porn, they can get their cut. Is anyone else as sick of this shit as I am??

 

[redsamurai]

Yes, I have, and that's how I can say it's gross.

Sex is beautiful, but not when it's some slutty whore getting banged by some other guy just for money.

It does turn me on for sure, but I find it offensive. When I was a teen, i'd watch it some out of curiosity. Now, I just don't watch it. If i come across a pic of some hot chick with her shirt off, I'll look. but, I never pull up movies and watch them.

life would be meaningless without porn.........just my .02......

 

[redsamurai]

Okay, I'll play Fem-Nazi: Because conservative men don't want women sex workers to have any control, rights or protection.

Actually Penn and Teller addressed this question on Bullshit, you can probably find the episode on YouTube. They think "blue laws" are fucking stupid, too.

I don't see how paying a sex worker is a whole lot different than, say, paying a waxer for a Brazillian. Both are touching intimate parts of your body and providing a personal service.

in one of my lifetimes I'm going to have sex with you..........you do know this right?? I WILL track you down eventually......

 

[redsamurai]

around here they call it a " prostate massage " and the chicks get away with it.

and just where would "around here" be???..........

 

[binö]

Yes, I have, and that's how I can say it's gross.

Sex is beautiful, but not when it's some slutty whore getting banged by some other guy just for money.

It does turn me on for sure, but I find it offensive. When I was a teen, i'd watch it some out of curiosity. Now, I just don't watch it. If i come across a pic of some hot chick with her shirt off, I'll look. but, I never pull up movies and watch them.

that's pretty much how i feel
i'm not so much disgusted, but not turned on watching some trashbag hoor get skull fucked and gang banged
still imgs are what this nizzle works it to, never porn movies