Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why always high EQ doses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big_BK
  • Start date Start date
If and when I do equipoise again I will bump it to 600mg a week also. I am just finishing up a long one at 400mg and just have a feeling that another 200mg/wk would really bring it into play. Maybe I just want more of a good thing. LOL.
 
i figure that the at 300 mg there is a about 300+ % increase in procollagen III (resp for collagen synthesis) which at that dose makes up for the amount reduced by the the same amount of test over 200mg and give a net increas of about 200%.

thus, the tendons and ligaments strength lags way behind the stress put on them during a cycle---so mg for mg over 200 of test should be matched by the equipoise. and thus somewhat track the increase in muscle strength.

to me, the increase in nitro retention, and therefore protein synth, is just a bonus to the real benefit of equipoise (if you don't get hurt you can lift heavier, longer, and more often)---without the side effects that you would get from deca at the same dose (which has about the same procollagen III synth increase).
 
I used blast and cruise. I'd cruise with 250 mg Test and 250 mg EQ weekly. I think it helped maintain most of my size and strength while giving my liver, kidneys, and blood pressure a break from the heavy Test/Tren/Deca/EQ/Dbol/and Adrol I'd blast with.
 
Big_BK said:
This has gotten my attention today since im relaxing and doing some reading. We always see "anything under 600 and you're wasting your time". Why do people always say you need to take at least that much to see results? A low dose around 200-400 HAS to have effects, it's not going to just float around in your system and not do anything unless you take X amount. So having brought this up, has anyone actually taken a lowish dose of EQ or does everyone just go along with the internet advice that everyone reads and takes as gospel and runs nothing lower then 600, etc. I want to hear some real world personal experiences not something you read and pass on as fact.

Word !

The same goes for duration. I am tired of reading posts that say unless you take it for 12-14 weeks it aint worth anything. Would these people seriously have you believe that from weeks 1-10 it will do nothing and then all of a sudden in weeks 12,13 and 14 it will start working and show results over night.

Yes it is longer acting and running it (or most steroids for longer durations will get better results) but 8-10 weeks is enough to get some fairly descent results - dont forget the eq will not miraculously dissapear in the body at week 8 or 10.
 
Last edited:
Nobody is saying anything about EQ as a stacking compound. The reason for stacking testo with EQ is to increase the the anabolic effect of the cycle without the added increase in androgenic sides that you would get from an similar increase in e.g. testo amount.

Will those of you saying that anything less than 600 mg EQ EW is a waste, make the same claim when eq is stackt with 500 mg testo? :confused:
 
I have ran it at 200, 300, 600, 800 and 1000mg. The ONLY thing I noticed was anxiety, and the vascularity it brings to veins. The hunger, is the same hunger you get from any other AAS. EQ = waste of money/ time in a cycle.
 
Big_BK said:
You are right varga, as with all meds there is a curve where the maximum effects of the drug are reached and after that any improvements are very minor with dosage increase and side effects become much more prevelent. However, i think there is a trend online recently where higher doses seem to be better when infact 400 will be doing pretty much the same as 600 in most cases with less sides.

I think you right about dosages....Sometimes more is not always better.
Talking from experience though, the more muscle you have passed what the body is genetically predisposed to, the more gear you need.
 
Top Bottom