Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Why always high EQ doses?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Big_BK
  • Start date Start date
You are right varga, as with all meds there is a curve where the maximum effects of the drug are reached and after that any improvements are very minor with dosage increase and side effects become much more prevelent. However, i think there is a trend online recently where higher doses seem to be better when infact 400 will be doing pretty much the same as 600 in most cases with less sides.
 
Big_BK said:
This has gotten my attention today since im relaxing and doing some reading. We always see "anything under 600 and you're wasting your time". Why do people always say you need to take at least that much to see results? A low dose around 200-400 HAS to have effects, it's not going to just float around in your system and not do anything unless you take X amount. So having brought this up, has anyone actually taken a lowish dose of EQ or does everyone just go along with the internet advice that everyone reads and takes as gospel and runs nothing lower then 600, etc. I want to hear some real world personal experiences not something you read and pass on as fact.


I would like to know this also. When i first asked everyone would tell me to run 500mgs of test for ten weeks for a first cycle i didnt do that though i just ran Prop EOD for 6 weeks on a low dose i did 50mgs for the first 4 weeks and bumped it up to 75 eod for the last two weeks. and i gained almost 20lbs then i took a 3 week break and ran 30mgs Dbol ed for 4 weeks along with sustanon 250 for 8 weeks total. Just ran the sust @ 250mgs ew split up into two shots and i grew very well on the low doses. When i started on the Prop i was 172lbs and when i finished with everything i was at 198lbs 10%bf im now around 187-190 but i still look good and feel good and strenght is still there not as much but my next cycle i will think it though better and not have a three week break. If i didnt take that 3 week break the cycle would of been 14 weeks for a first cycle. I think i am going to get bashed for this but you learn from your mistakes and i will better plan next time i did have everything on hand for pct and i still do i am in pct right now using sustain alpha and this other stuff called Restore and some phyto test. My whole point of this post is that you dont need high dose to grow. I know i went all over in this post hopefully not confusing and i dont want to thread hijack since its not about EQ im just saying.
 
I just recently did a 24 weeker of Test Prop EOD @100mg and EQ @ 500mg EW. The results were phenomenal. I am still vascular as hell from it. I put on a clean 14lbs from that last cycle and had absolutely no sides. My mood was actually the most elevated it had been in a long while.
 
You always need higher mg's of anabolics per week as opposed to androgenic mg's.

EQ alone is an anabolic compound with little androgenic properties on it's own.
 
I have ran it at 400mg and 500mg per week....Just because it was dosed at 200mg/ml and 250mg/ml. I enjoyed it and will run it at the same amount again.
 
Big_BK said:
This has gotten my attention today since im relaxing and doing some reading. We always see "anything under 600 and you're wasting your time". Why do people always say you need to take at least that much to see results? A low dose around 200-400 HAS to have effects, it's not going to just float around in your system and not do anything unless you take X amount. So having brought this up, has anyone actually taken a lowish dose of EQ or does everyone just go along with the internet advice that everyone reads and takes as gospel and runs nothing lower then 600, etc. I want to hear some real world personal experiences not something you read and pass on as fact.
Basically it comes down to this. Every steroid profile across the net lists the avg dose of Eq to be 400mg a week. Most people will tell you (and for good reason) that using less then 200mg of test a week is pointless. Less then this that would be less then a hrt dose.

To make Equipoise, a double bond was added between carbon atoms 1 and 2 of the Steran Nucleus of Testosterone. This means Eq is only half as androgenic as test and though most profile will say its just as anabolic (no one will ever make claims they gained as much with eq as they did with a equal amount of test)

So eq is about half that of test. So almost no one would say to use less then 200mg ew of test and like wise not many people or steroid profiles will tell people to use less then 400mg ew of EQ.


Also eq's Undeclynate is a longer ester then decanoate by one carbon. This makes for much slower muscle building over time. A common practice has been to front load (but I don't buy into it).


We should also take into account that many people will who take the jump from 400mg ew to 600mg ew will deff boast about the difference. Its very noticeable. So much so that most people will say its much more worth it to use 600mg ew. But like I said and most steroid profiles will say. Less then 400mg is like taking less then 200mg of test a week and not really worth it.
 
done eq once and at 400mg/wk for 12 and it was great.
 
Everybody is different. First time I used EQ it was at 400 mg per week for 12 weeks. Now I do 600 mg per week and like it much better.
 
Top Bottom