shwaym said:
i dont understand why everyone is always on arnold's d!ck. why do people like his chest? it was just BIG but it looked like sh!t.
his genetics werent that good. sure he was huge for his age as a teen but look at him fully developed, see what CoolColJ said.
Uhh...
Just how did his chest "look like shit"?
It looked pretty fucking incredible to me. You say it's big, so what's it lacking? What makes it look bad?
Detail?
BZZZZZZZT. Nope. He had some of the most shredded pecs we've seen to date.
Shape? Looked great to me. His pecs sat up on that big rib cage; you could lose a hand grenade between them, too.
What does that leave?
The ONLY guys with roughly equal pecs, IMO, would be Markus Ruhl, Bertil Fox at his very best, and maybe Lee Haney. A no. of other pros today have great chests--Coleman, Levrone for the side chest--but to say Arnold's looked like shit...*shakes head*. I don't get it. By most experienced eyes, Arnold's pecs still rank at the very top.
id say serge nubret could be but ive never ever seen his back it could suck but his chest & abs are crazy.
http://www.briansdriveintheater.com/hercules/sergenubret10.jpg
its a tie between lee priest and wheeler. lee has a genetic hormone imbalance enabling him too build so much muscle yet at the same time it sealed off his growth plates. [/B][/QUOTE]