Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Turning On A Rec Dealer
- Thread starter ANOINTED
- Start date
sounds like my first post diseapred. SO yes, in Canada it's possible. In fact, for most crimes this possibility will exist as long as you have valuable info, on someone important (not just a little 18 yr old punk) and aren't a notorious liar. If all is met, they might offer you a bargain. But it's case by case. Depends on the prosecutor.
canadianhitman
Well-known member
A rat is a rat for any reason....
Is it really worth reducing the (likely) mild sentence you'd get on a juice conviction, considering that you'd now have someone out there wanting to do you grievous harm? Even if the guy you rat out is a punk, think for a minute: who's he getting the coke from? The guys he gets the goods from most likely have enforcers in their ranks, and they'll be glad to extract revenge on your patsy's behalf since he took the fall and didn't rat THEM out.
Is it really worth reducing the (likely) mild sentence you'd get on a juice conviction, considering that you'd now have someone out there wanting to do you grievous harm? Even if the guy you rat out is a punk, think for a minute: who's he getting the coke from? The guys he gets the goods from most likely have enforcers in their ranks, and they'll be glad to extract revenge on your patsy's behalf since he took the fall and didn't rat THEM out.
Atomic Punk
New member
BigAndy69 said:
You're WAY wrong. It happens everyday man. I find it annoying when people like you make such bold statements, that are 100% inaccurate. Goes to show you how much post-count equates to knowledge. If Cops persuade a person to roll in the hope of nabbing someone bigger or better, then DIDN'T help the person who gave them that info, then NOONE would EVER give any info!!! The whole reason people do give info, is because they KNOW it WILL get them a lighter ride in the end. Bottom line: every part of your statement is WRONG!!!
Atomic Punk said:
Laplaine Jail (near Montréal) is fll of rats, and they're all complaining about how the govt. didn't respect their contract. One of them died few months ago in Alberta. He had to remain in the "hole" 24/7 other wise he could be killed. The minute he left the hole, guess what....
GoldenDelicious
New member
as said above it is case by case, cop by cop- cop most important of all
i personally think its everyones responsibility to rat on drug dealers (those that deal addictive drugs, not AS) since they RUIN a lot of lives.
when you see junkies and what some of them go through and do to essentially keep dealers rich, you wont care about the dealer at all
so yeah rat away, dont feel bad or be macho about taking your medicine- burn them all
thats just imo btw
i personally think its everyones responsibility to rat on drug dealers (those that deal addictive drugs, not AS) since they RUIN a lot of lives.
when you see junkies and what some of them go through and do to essentially keep dealers rich, you wont care about the dealer at all
so yeah rat away, dont feel bad or be macho about taking your medicine- burn them all
thats just imo btw
Atomic Punk
New member
manny78 said:
Sorry. Not Canadian.
Atomic Punk
New member
no pian said:
Were you one of them? Im going by your spelling. Figured you must be pretty "messed up". At least add an "o" to the end of your name so it makes some damn sense goofball.
GoldenDelicious said:
No cop is authorized to strike a deal, only the prosecutor. If a deal is to be struck it should be between the defence lawyer and the prosecutor. That way all angles are covered
Anyone who strikes a deal without a defence council present is a fool and left open to all kinds of judicial bs.
Atomic Punk
New member
BigAndy69 said:
Name-calling. Last resort, when one has nothing left intelligent to argue I guess.. I know cops who work Narco, and they say that snitches account for 95% of all their cases. Why would anyone bother giving up info, if it wasn't going to help them in the long run? That makes no sense. Maybe things are different up north, but that is the way it works here. I don't agree with any of it, but that, unfortunately, is how the boat floats here in the USA.
Cops have NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER to help a rat.
NONE.
NEITHER do prosecutors! ONLY the judge has the authority to sentence. The judge need not even accept a plea bargain hashed out by defense and prosecution. He can decide to accept your guilty plea then sentence you to the maximum.
Now, this happening is exceedingly rare, because to do it often would undercut completely the plea process, but it does happen.
Unless the prosecution reduces your charge, I would be wary of a bargain. Charge reduction reduces your maximum penalty. So, you should plead to a lesser offense always.
The bottom line is NEVER trust a cop. Cops are out and out fucking scumbag liars. They want rats for probable cause affidavits. They don't want them as witnesses unless they absolutely freakin need them because snitches are only lying when their mouths are moving, like cops.
NONE.
NEITHER do prosecutors! ONLY the judge has the authority to sentence. The judge need not even accept a plea bargain hashed out by defense and prosecution. He can decide to accept your guilty plea then sentence you to the maximum.
Now, this happening is exceedingly rare, because to do it often would undercut completely the plea process, but it does happen.
Unless the prosecution reduces your charge, I would be wary of a bargain. Charge reduction reduces your maximum penalty. So, you should plead to a lesser offense always.
The bottom line is NEVER trust a cop. Cops are out and out fucking scumbag liars. They want rats for probable cause affidavits. They don't want them as witnesses unless they absolutely freakin need them because snitches are only lying when their mouths are moving, like cops.
