Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Synthol Syntherol Adds 3 inches to your biceps in 30 days. Really!

George Spellwin

The Architect
Staff member
Administrator
Elite Moderator
Moderator
A new story entry has been added:

Synthol Syntherol Adds 3 inches to your biceps in 30 days. Really!

Do you want to gain up to 3" of new muscle on your arms in 30 days? How about making similar sized gains in your other muscle groups? Then I would like to tell you all about the Number 1 selling Site Enhancing Oil in the world, Syntherol brand synthol from Synthetek!
 
Sounds safe.... 12 weeks of 100mg/150mg tren/test eod and i didnt even get 3 inchs on my bis.... Must be a hella water weight bloat. lol
 
I've used it, it does what it's suppose to do, expand the muscle facia via temporary enlargement of the muscle the facia is stretched, during a steroid cycle where new muscle fiber/hypertrophy is possible the oil will be absorbed eventually and in it's place is new muscle fiber..

so the theory goes.. it is possible, however my experience is the larger size is there, but the "feel" of the muscle is soft which i didn't like at all..

WIll i use it again?? sure, if i'm on cycle and bulking..

and that's how it's done..
 
just type synthol in youtube, fasten your seat belt before

Let me guess you also think that Valentino used synthol??

All the idiots on Youtube have either IMPLANTS or used DIRTY PRODUCT, or ABUSED SEO.
But now they look like freaks.

What's funny is that people like you think that is the norm... yet I'm willing to bet you haven't
done even a shred of investigation or even 1 search to find out the proper way to use such a
product.

Then you will go into the bathroom, shove 3grams of gear per week and think you are going
places doing shit the 'right' way since SEO is sooooooooooooo BAAAAAD and dangerous!.
 
I've used it and kept over 2" on my arms after the maintenance period and inflammation subsided! It's an excellent product that really works if used properly and the protocol is followed.

And for all those that like to throw around Valentino's name, shows their education to the product. Valentino had implants that he was site injecting AAS into. No muscle group can achieve those sizes or shape from any SEO or AAS.
 
Used syntherol on tri's and biceps, put 1.5 inches on and was able to maintain that increase. Would def agree that it should be taken on a cycle and off season. My arms have def benefited from using seo, I was unable to get past 17.5 now they are 19" which I'm delighted with. I'm competing in October so will not use seo again until well after that.
 
im using it at the minute great pumps off the stuff but why are some of you saying its better to use it while on a cycle??? because i was gona wait until i had finished it, then start my off season cycle
 
I know way to many people that used that with really bad results...however, if you have a doctor doing it for you, it can yield crazy results...look t some of the pros....
 
I know way to many people that used that with really bad
results...however, if you have a doctor doing it for you, it can yield crazy results...look t some of
the pros....

You don't need a doctor to use Syntherol. Just like you don't need to be a doctor to use gear.

Although you DO need to research anything you put into your body. Too many people don't.

I would be very interested to hear what went wrong with the people that you know who have
used SEOs and had unfavourable results and/or complications.
 
You don't need a doctor to use Syntherol. Just like you don't need to be a doctor to use gear.

Although you DO need to research anything you put into your body. Too many people don't.

I would be very interested to hear what went wrong with the people that you know who have
used SEOs and had unfavourable results and/or complications.
Well, where do I start. The fact that your muscle always looks pumped is abnormal. The fact that most people dont go deep enough when they inject and when it gets hot enough, it looks like there arm is melting and sagging because of the oil in there. The fact that if you dont do it perfectly, your arm looks uneven. I could go on and on. The fact that you can be tiny all around and have 22 inch arms looking retarded.
 
Well, where do I start. The fact that your muscle always looks pumped is abnormal. The fact that most people dont go deep enough when they inject and when it gets hot enough, it looks like there arm is melting and sagging because of the oil in there. The fact that if you dont do it perfectly, your arm looks uneven. I could go on and on. The fact that you can be tiny all around and have 22 inch arms looking retarded.

These are all examples of people not doing the research and following the protocol the way it should be.

Too many people just decide to jump in without understanding how to use the product (which is the same for any substance in this sport). As has been said, people just want the quick results, regardless of whether it be AAS, Peptides or SEO's. They do not want to put in the work, and that does not only include time in the gym, but also time studying the substances they are and will be injecting into their bodies.

I believe the major problem with those that do not achieve the correct results from Syntherol, (besides the obvious of not studying and following the proper protocol - pins size, amounts, duration, etc.) is do to the lack of definition. Most are not lean enough to see the individual muscle heads that they are looking at injecting. This is why I always stress the fact that Syntherol is for the advanced bodybuilder.
 
These are all examples of people not doing the research and following the protocol the way it should be.

Too many people just decide to jump in without understanding how to use the product (which is the same for any substance in this sport). As has been said, people just want the quick results, regardless of whether it be AAS, Peptides or SEO's. They do not want to put in the work, and that does not only include time in the gym, but also time studying the substances they are and will be injecting into their bodies.

I believe the major problem with those that do not achieve the correct results from Syntherol, (besides the obvious of not studying and following the proper protocol - pins size, amounts, duration, etc.) is do to the lack of definition. Most are not lean enough to see the individual muscle heads that they are looking at injecting. This is why I always stress the fact that Syntherol is for the advanced bodybuilder.

The likelihood for the muscle to look abnormal, even with proper use is much greater than the benefits of synthol IMO
 
Meh, using Syntherol just seems fake to me. You don't really grow your arms through training, you just fill them up with crap. Barring any serious injuries, I plan on having 20-21" arms in less than 2 years without using it. I'm not a pro bodybuilder and don't want them to get any bigger than that.

There's people who I respect that use it, but I just don't agree with it. It's just my humble opinion. :whatever:
 
Meh, using Syntherol just seems fake to me. You don't really grow your arms through training, you just fill them up with crap. Barring any serious injuries, I plan on having 20-21" arms in less than 2 years without using it. I'm not a pro bodybuilder and don't want them to get any bigger than that.

There's people who I respect that use it, but I just don't agree with it. It's just my humble opinion. :whatever:

How about you read on what and how it actually works/does and not believe the misconceptions propagated by the uneducated?
 
A natural will tell you that the likelyhood of dying from steroids is greater than the benefits.

I agree, this is a perfect point!

Anyone that doesn't do AAS will say that it is cheating and the muscles are fake and only from the AAS. Someone that has never done Syntherol, will say the same thing.:rolleyes:
 
I do, otherwise, I wouldn't have wrote it.

What are the similarities?

There are Many similarities, right off the top of my head...Both are used in Bodybuilding, both are used to promote muscle growth.

Also, regardless of what someone believes as to whether Syntherol works or not, Big A's statement is correct. Many will say that AAS is dangerous, stupid and trying to get the quick fix, because they are uneducated as to what AAS is and what it does. The same as anyone uneducated to Syntherol use will say that it is dangerous, stupid and trying to get the quick fix.
 
There are Many similarities, right off the top of my head...Both are used in Bodybuilding, both are used to promote muscle growth.

Also, regardless of what someone believes as to whether Syntherol works or not, Big A's statement is correct. Many will say that AAS is dangerous, stupid and trying to get the quick fix, because they are uneducated as to what AAS is and what it does. The same as anyone uneducated to Syntherol use will say that it is dangerous, stupid and trying to get the quick fix.

I believe you took that question a bit out of context bro. Using the same logic you could also say that protein shakes and AAS have a lot of similarities too. I'm thinking he meant
more on a chemical structure. AAS are synthetic hormones that require a catalyst and an energy source in order to be productive were as all synthol needs is pre existing muscle tissue and a pain tolerance. I obviously consider there to be immense differences between the two. If they were located in the grocery store, one would be in the cooking isle and the other would be in the bodybuilding isle.
 
There are Many similarities, right off the top of my head...Both are used in Bodybuilding, both are used to promote muscle growth.

Also, regardless of what someone believes as to whether Syntherol works or not, Big A's statement is correct. Many will say that AAS is dangerous, stupid and trying to get the quick fix, because they are uneducated as to what AAS is and what it does. The same as anyone uneducated to Syntherol use will say that it is dangerous, stupid and trying to get the quick fix.

What you are saying is a bit ludicrous.

Protein promotes muscles growth and is used by bodybuilders. Is protein similar to aas and synthol? No.
 
As far as i know synthol doesnt promote muscle growth at all.
You're simply getting oil stuck in a specific muscle to make it look bigger.
Kinda retarded.. "look how big my bicep is... now watch me curl this 20 pound dumbell 5 time!!!" yea.. stupid.
 
I do, otherwise, I wouldn't have wrote it.

What aas are you comparing to synthol exactly? What are the similarities?

Using either for the purpose of bodybuilding etc is classified as "cheating/fake/easy way out" by the uneducated.

That is the similarity.

Now no matter how many different analogies we use to try and differentiate the 2 it all comes down to that.
 
I believe you took that question a bit out of context bro. Using the
same logic you could also say that protein shakes and AAS have a lot of similarities too.

No it was't and no you can't. Protein is naturally occuring whether in milk or food. Unless you
want to say that eating food is cheating too.. by YOUR logic. Oh and last time i checked you
don't inject protein..

I'm thinking he meant more on a chemical structure. AAS are synthetic hormones that
require a catalyst and an energy source in order to be productive were as all synthol needs is
pre existing muscle tissue and a pain tolerance.
Research the product before you make any more uneducated statements about how it does or
doesn't work. You tube videos don't count.. sorry.

I obviously consider there to be immense differences between the two. If they were
located in the grocery store, one would be in the cooking isle and the other would be in the
bodybuilding isle.

Lol. Then you would have a lot of bodybuilders in the 'wrong' aisle..
 
Using either for the purpose of bodybuilding etc is classified as "cheating/fake/easy way out" by the uneducated.

That is the similarity.

Now no matter how many different analogies we use to try and differentiate the 2 it all comes down to that.

I was speaking more on a molecular standpoint, you're speaking more theoretical.

In response to your point though wouldn't you think synthol would be considered more 'cheating' then aas? If you took aas and sat on your ass you would not increase the size of your muscle. If you injected synthol into your arm and sat on your ass wouldn't your arm increase in size still?
 
I was speaking more on a molecular standpoint, you're speaking more theoretical.

In response to your point though wouldn't you think synthol would be considered more 'cheating' then aas? If you took aas and sat on your ass you would not increase the size of your muscle. If you injected synthol into your arm and sat on your ass wouldn't your arm increase in size still?

During a Syntherol course, you need to work the injected muscle group daily (at least a few light sets daily, as well as your regular training on that particular muscle group throughout the week) to assure that the muscle fascia is stretched and the muscle is pumped to help move the oil evenly throughout the muscle group. If you sat on your ass while running Syntherol without working the injected muscle group, once the inflammation subsided and the oil dissipated, you would be left with no gains from the product. Syntherol, AAS, and light sets on the muscle group daily, all work together to create the size. The Syntherol and daily light sets, help to maximize stretching the muscle fascia. Being at the optimum anabolic state during the Syntherol maintenance period is what will maximize the muscle growth and assist in the gains being permanent. Hence the laid out amounts and protocols per muscle group for a Syntherol course.

Syntherol is just another tool in the bodybuilding world. It has to be done properly and safely, the same as any other substance used in bodybuilding to achieve one's goals. So if you cheat at any of the variables, Syntherol, AAS, diet or training, you will reap no benefit and your goals will not be met.
 
In response to your point though wouldn't you think synthol
would be considered more 'cheating' then aas?

Not at all. It's exactly the same principle and not at all theoretic. It's plain fact.

Those who do not know/understand about aas will say its cheating.

Those who do not know/understand about SEOs but know about aas will say that SEOs are cheating.

Even though you may gain size from shooting the oil in, you will never keep any of it unless
you work for it (the oil is absorbed). Just like anything, whether using aas or not. Now some
people won't, they will just keep shooting it and shooting it (without putting in the effort with
their training and dieting) and at the same time look like a clown when their arms are as big as
their legs. But if you can just wrap your mind around the fact that this is NOT the intended
use (abuse) of the product you will see it is just another tool in achieving bodybuilding goals.
 
Can it bring your lifts up or have any athletic advantages? I think not, and i have read the theroy in that article about how it stretches out and makes room for new muscle fiber to grow.... So its whatever if u wana stick urself with that crap its your right to do so but its deff not for me or any serious athletes that do more than pose.
 
Can it bring your lifts up or have any athletic advantages? I think not, and i have read the theroy in that article about how it stretches out and makes room for new muscle fiber to grow.... So its whatever if u wana stick urself with that crap its your right to do so but its deff not for me or any serious athletes that do more than pose.

Tell that to the world champion powerlifters that use Syntherol - bigger muscles = stronger muscles. Sometimes the ignorance of some statements is staggering.

Or how about any top level bodybuilder, like Justin Rys in the Synthetek banner above, who has been openly using Syntherol for years in his delts, and he does seated behind the neck presses with 4 plates a side for 8. Yeah, it's all show :rolleyes:
 
Tell that to the world champion powerlifters that use Syntherol - bigger muscles = stronger muscles. Sometimes the ignorance of some statements is staggering.

Or how about any top level bodybuilder, like Justin Rys in the Synthetek banner above, who has been openly using Syntherol for years in his delts, and he does seated behind the neck presses with 4 plates a side for 8. Yeah, it's all show :rolleyes:

Ok im opening up myself so you or anyone else can educate me so im not ignorant, and ill ask you a serious question.

Has synthol made you more althletic or stronger?
 
Ok im opening up myself so you or anyone else can educate me so im not ignorant, and ill ask you a serious question.

Has synthol made you more althletic or stronger?

Stronger - yes. Ahtletic? I hope you are not correlating bodybuilding with athleticism/fitness/health.
 
Stronger - yes. Ahtletic? I hope you are not correlating bodybuilding with athleticism/fitness/health.

No im not i know that bb is all about posing and not everyone on this board is a bb... There are athletes, power lifters, bb and just reg people that want to be fit that dont even use gear let alone synthol...

Ok so fair enough your answer is yes, synthol made you stronger.

Anyone else use synthol? Like to comment on how much stronger it made you?
 
No im not i know that bb is all about posing and not everyone on this board is a bb... There are athletes, power lifters, bb and just reg people that want to be fit that dont even use gear let alone synthol...

Ok so fair enough your answer is yes, synthol made you stronger.

Anyone else use synthol? Like to comment on how much stronger it made you?

My lifts went up while running Syntherol, so I would have to say yes, it did make me stronger. I also, noticed more vascularity while running Syntherol (and I am normally a vascular person).

Some cannot handle the pumps they get from the ed injections, too much pain, equals weaker lifts. I agree, the bugger the muscle, the stronger the muscle. Remember though, everything in this game is strictly individual.

Also, people miss the fact that Syntherol is not only used for enlarging muscles, it is also used to shape them as well.
 
This debate is like saying... well marijuana is a drug, so is Heroin, both used by drug addicts, you can just as well go heroin if you ever smoked some green.

To the uneducated both are just as bad...

To the EDUCATED we KNOW that one is worse than the other..

I know that steroids is not good for me in the long run, but I CAN get away with it.

I know that Synthol can make me look great, but the risk of fucking it up and destroying myself is greater.
So by choice, I think synthol is the worse choice. I would never use it myself, I would have to see scientific reports that the theory about muscle expansion from oil leading to solid muscle over time is correct. Bro-Science is not Science...
 
This debate is like saying... well marijuana is a drug, so is Heroin, both used by drug addicts, you can just as well go heroin if you ever smoked some green.

To the uneducated both are just as bad...

To the EDUCATED we KNOW that one is worse than the other..

I know that steroids is not good for me in the long run, but I CAN get away with it.

I know that Synthol can make me look great, but the risk of fucking it up and destroying myself is greater.
So by choice, I think synthol is the worse choice. I would never use it myself, I would have to see scientific reports that the theory about muscle expansion from oil leading to solid muscle over time is correct. Bro-Science is not Science...

Read dat's article - fully referenced with a great deal of verifiable scientific data.
 
This debate is like saying... well marijuana is a drug, so is Heroin, both used by drug addicts, you can just as well go heroin if you ever smoked some green.

To the uneducated both are just as bad...

To the EDUCATED we KNOW that one is worse than the other..

I know that steroids is not good for me in the long run, but I CAN get away with it.

I know that Synthol can make me look great, but the risk of fucking it up and destroying myself is greater.
So by choice, I think synthol is the worse choice. I would never use it myself, I would have to see scientific reports that the theory about muscle expansion from oil leading to solid muscle over time is correct. Bro-Science is not Science...
http://www.synthetek.com/the-science-behind-syntherol/
 
Personally I would never even consider using the stuff.

Nothing wrong with that, different people have different goals. SEOs provide an alternative for
upping the gear when the sides become to great or when upping the gear is no longer an option.

Many IFBB pros would not be the way they are if it were not for the use of Syntherol and other SEOs.

It's just another tool in the game.
 
Can someone please tell me which is the best synthol and is the synthetek brand any good ?? Im new to this site and hope i can get some good advice.
 
What the fuck... take a look at carrot top's shoulders and ask yourself if you want to get oil "implants" in your biceps LOL.

Edit: I don't mean to come off as condescending. As I understand it, synthol is just oil that allows your muscle to expand and then be "replaced" my muscle tissue... wouldn't that decrease vascularity? Am I mistaken?
 
What the fuck... take a look at carrot top's shoulders and ask yourself if you want to get oil "implants" in your biceps LOL.

Edit: I don't mean to come off as condescending. As I understand it, synthol is just oil that allows your muscle to expand and then be "replaced" my muscle tissue... wouldn't that decrease vascularity? Am I mistaken?

Yes vasularity, hardness etc all goes down during SEO use as the affected bodypart inflames
substantially due to all the pinning.

However once you are finished using the product and the body recovers from the daily pinning.
and inflammation recedes vascularity and detail all returns and is even greater then before you
started.

When you look at people like carrot top, it is clear that he did not do his SEO well. If done
properly you cannot even tell such a product has been used. The whole aim is to bring a
bodypart up to match symmetry wise. Not to stick out, like it does with him.
 
Maybe next week we'll get a link to discounted calf implants, or maybe some collagen injections...
 
Edit: I don't mean to come off as condescending. As I understand it, synthol is just oil that allows your muscle to expand and then be "replaced" my muscle tissue... wouldn't that decrease vascularity? Am I mistaken?

I noticed increased vascularity while cycling Syntherol,both in my bis and tris.
 
Let me guess you also think that Valentino used synthol??

All the idiots on Youtube have either IMPLANTS or used DIRTY PRODUCT, or ABUSED SEO.
But now they look like freaks.

What's funny is that people like you think that is the norm... yet I'm willing to bet you haven't
done even a shred of investigation or even 1 search to find out the proper way to use such a
product.

Then you will go into the bathroom, shove 3grams of gear per week and think you are going
places doing shit the 'right' way since SEO is sooooooooooooo BAAAAAD and dangerous!.


You can not be serious bro...
While taking AAS can have its downsides and can be considered a "shortcut" at least you still have to put in work to earn some real muscle gains, not just swell your arms up with oil.
 
You can not be serious bro...
While taking AAS can have its downsides and can be considered a "shortcut" at least you still have to put in work to earn some real muscle gains, not just swell your arms up with oil.

You have no idea how the product works. Do some research and than come back.
 
You can not be serious bro...
While taking AAS can have its downsides and can be considered a "shortcut" at least you
still have to put in work to earn some real muscle gains, not just swell your arms up with oil.

I am curious... did you do any research on the product? Have you

Because if you didn't.. Why are you replying in a thread when you don't understand the topic
of conversation. Whereas if you did then you would know that all Site Enhancing Oils do is
stretch the muscle fascia to allow existing muscle to grow further.

The 'swelling up' of the muscles is only temporary. While the oil is present. Within 6 weeks all
of the oil is absorbed and gone. This in turn should leave some 'slack' for the muscle to grow into.

So unless the subject has diet, training, rest and to some extent supplementation in check the
whole time, all the 'size' he gets through oil's presence within the body will disappear.

Sure some people will use the product this way and keep pumping oil in there to maintain this
fake size but it is not how it is meant to be used.
 
I am curious... did you do any research on the product? Have you

Because if you didn't.. Why are you replying in a thread when you don't understand the topic
of conversation. Whereas if you did then you would know that all Site Enhancing Oils do is
stretch the muscle fascia to allow existing muscle to grow further.

The 'swelling up' of the muscles is only temporary. While the oil is present. Within 6 weeks all
of the oil is absorbed and gone. This in turn should leave some 'slack' for the muscle to grow into.

So unless the subject has diet, training, rest and to some extent supplementation in check the
whole time, all the 'size' he gets through oil's presence within the body will disappear.

Sure some people will use the product this way and keep pumping oil in there to maintain this
fake size but it is not how it is meant to be used.

Agreed. I believe it is the most misunderstood product out there, with the most uneducated individuals to the product commenting on it!
 
I believe that product has its place in bodybuilding if you are a pro bodybuilder or if you are being injected by a doctor. Too much hassle for the common joe to do it IMO. Again, this is my opinion only - dont jump down my throat here. I have seen pros use it successfully, a lot of them actually...but I am yet to see a regular joe schmo use it without looking like a souche bag
 
I believe that product has its place in bodybuilding if you are a pro bodybuilder or if you are being injected by a doctor. Too much hassle for the common joe to do it IMO. Again, this is my opinion only - dont jump down my throat here. I have seen pros use it successfully, a lot of them actually...but I am yet to see a regular joe schmo use it without looking like a souche bag

I completely agree!

I also believe that SEOs are definitely not for everyone. You need to have extensive
knowledge and experience with shots aswell as be prepared for a lot of them daily. This in
itself is quite a hassle and a quite a fair bit of discomfort for the length of the cycle.

The only part of your post I would differ on is the limiting of its use to pros only as a lot of
people will say the same thing about gear, why expose yourself to health risks aswell as all the
side effects when your paycheck doesn't depend on it. But as we all know lots of people use
gear and SEOs whether pro or not. As long as you are properly educated on whatever you are
taking/using I believe that's most important.

Also regarding regular Joe Schmo looking good after using SEOs, you can see numerous logs
and before after photos of regular lifters that have used and posted here:

Syntherol - Site Enhancing Oil #1 SEO in the world.

I don't believe any of them look like douche bags.
 
I believe that product has its place in bodybuilding if you are a pro bodybuilder or if you are being injected by a doctor. Too much hassle for the common joe to do it IMO. Again, this is my opinion only - dont jump down my throat here. I have seen pros use it successfully, a lot of them actually...but I am yet to see a regular joe schmo use it without looking like a souche bag

I agree for the most part here. Although I have seen non-IFBB Pros use Syntherol with great results, but you are correct and as I have said many times, it is for the Advanced bodybuilder, not for someone just starting out who thinks he is going to get a head of training, diet and proper supplement use!
 
not for someone just starting out who thinks he is going to get a head of training, diet and proper supplement use!

That's exactly right, but unfortunately that's is how a lot of people believe SEOs are used. To
'inflate' a muscle when really that is just what happens when you push oil in there and as soon as
the body processes and absorbs that oil its gone.

People don't realise the size attained from SEOs is attained in the same way size is attained when
using gear. Through WORK, DIET and SLEEP. Exactly the same. IF you do not do it that way any
size you may have thought you got through using oils will disappear and to maintain it you will
need to keep pumping oil in there which is NOT the way to do it.
 
Alright.
Havent even bothered to look at this thread in a while, but...
Yes, i know that this stuff is supposed to stretch the fascia and allow for more muscle growth, but look at how many people use it to simply "look bigger"

Correct me if i'm wrong, (and it seems like someone will even when i'm not) but the majority of bodybuilders dont use this to "stretch the fascia.." they use it before competitions and such to help with symmetry and get an even look throughout the body in places they might be lacking.
So yes, while this product can have its good uses, I see it as one that is actually abused and to me is as bad as getting calve implants.
Here is a youtube video of synthol leaking out of a guys arm during a competition, He defiantly wasn't trying to stretch any fascia
shoulder is leaking - YouTube
 
Alright.
So yes, while this product can have its good uses, I see it as one that is actually abused and to
me is as bad as getting calve implants.

You can say the same thing about steroids, stimulants and a lot of other things. People will
abuse almost everything under the sun. Now does that somehow detract from the value of the
product?

I don't see how. Someone stupidly using the product doesn't make the product stupid.

Here is a youtube video of synthol leaking out of a guys arm during a competition, He
defiantly wasn't trying to stretch any fascia shoulder is leaking - YouTube

That's not synthol lol. That an abcess and that white shit looks to be puss.
 
Correct me if i'm wrong, (and it seems like someone will even when i'm not) but the majority of bodybuilders dont use this to "stretch the fascia.." they use it before competitions and such to help with symmetry and get an even look throughout the body in places they might be lacking.
So yes, while this product can have its good uses, I see it as one that is actually abused and to me is as bad as getting calve implants.
Here is a youtube video of synthol leaking out of a guys arm during a competition, He defiantly wasn't trying to stretch any fascia
shoulder is leaking - YouTube

That video has been posted many times on many boards, and as has been stated, it is not Syntherol. Syntherol is not white, puss from an abcess is.

I know many pros that have and do use Syntherol, and most use it during cycles as well as prior to competition.
 
That video has been posted many times on many boards, and as has been stated, it is not Syntherol. Syntherol is not white, puss from an abcess is.

I know many pros that have and do use Syntherol, and most use it during cycles as well as prior to competition.

Injections cause abscesses bro
 
Injections cause abscesses bro

Of course they do. Does that mean that all abcesses are caused by Syntherol, of course not?

The video has been posted on many boards and referring to Syntherol use, is due to the white fluid leaking out of his arm. The point I was making is that Syntherol is not white, so the fluid leaking out is not Syntherol. An abcess can be caused by any substance.
 
Of course they do. Does that mean that all abcesses are caused by Syntherol, of course not?

The video has been posted on many boards and referring to Syntherol use, is due to the white fluid leaking out of his arm. The point I was making is that Syntherol is not white, so the fluid leaking out is not Syntherol. An abcess can be caused by any substance.

Of course not bro but your post insinuated that it couldn't have been from synthol since it was an abscess.
 
Of course not bro but your post insinuated that it couldn't have been from synthol since it was an abscess.

Only because everone seems to insinuate that it couldn't have been from gear since it was an abcess it must be Synthol.
 
Top Bottom