Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
crazyjoe said:
Why would you assume that?
Primo -- The Misunderstood Steroid!
- Thread starter Nelson Montana
- Start date
Why would you assume that?
Harleymarleybone
New member
I always wanted to try Primo.
crazyjoe said:For a tissue rebuilder or..maybe I'm wrong and should go sit in the corner now....
All steroids build tissue bro. Why add something that is less effective and more supressive?
crazyjoe said:I can't see the monitor from the corner I'm sittng in now...
No problem bro.
aquatic_glories
New member
yes a great one.
Nelson,
hair loss effects of Primobolan is thought to be lesser than test deratives because what is forms is much weaker than DHT. (it is DHB and it is said to be half as strong as DHT)
so based on this fact, even if a male is prone to hair loss 500 mg of primobolan will cause less hair loss than 500 mg of test right???
I am actually prone to hair loss but thanks to very strict anti-topical use and low dosage, i almost didnt lose any hair while on 500mg test. So this makes primobolan even better use right???
thanks
Nelson,
hair loss effects of Primobolan is thought to be lesser than test deratives because what is forms is much weaker than DHT. (it is DHB and it is said to be half as strong as DHT)
so based on this fact, even if a male is prone to hair loss 500 mg of primobolan will cause less hair loss than 500 mg of test right???
I am actually prone to hair loss but thanks to very strict anti-topical use and low dosage, i almost didnt lose any hair while on 500mg test. So this makes primobolan even better use right???
thanks
aquatic_glories
New member
bump for nelson's answer
Similar threads
