SirMack,
FYI, Body For Life (BFL)'s approach is different from CKD. I am sure by now you probably have your head spinning and wondering which way to go because so many people are recommending you so many different things.
I did BFL also and it dropped my bf% from 22% to 12% in 12 weeks. It worked for me. W/ BFL, u still need to count calaroes but it emphasis on a balance diet w/ good portion of carb, protein and fat in it. It is totally different from CKD cuz' CKD limits your carb intake. It is believed that CKD helps to loose weight very efficiently. I can't comment on that because I haven't tried it myself. But just like what "Tha One Crumcake" has said...
"Any decent diet / nutrition plan would work if you stick to it"
No matter which one you pick, u need to stick to it.
From my opinion, BFL's approach resemmbles a nutrition plan that can be carried on for the rest of one's life. (balance carb, protein and fat intake) I am not saying CKD is not good, but in all honestly, how many people can do a 5 days low carb and 2 days carb load for the rest of their life? I believe, in my humble opinion, CKD is used to loose weight effectively but at some point, a person will have to move on to a "regular" nutrition plan. Since you are gonna do that anyway, why not do it with one that's closer to a 'regular nutrition plan", which is more like that you can carry on for the rest of your life.
The reason that I didn't post this earlier is because I didn't want to introduce another variable to you since you are at your infant stage of weight loss. However, now that somebody mentioned BFL, I figure I would throw in my 2 cents. You will hear many opposing opinions about BFL, but in my mind, BFL's nutrition approach is probably one of the more realistic ones that one can truely benefit from as a "way of life."
No matter which one you choose, remember...
"Any decent diet / nutrition plan would work if you stick to it."