Pit bull owners getting what they deserve!

[230lbs]

I wouldn't expect anything intelligent. OK, you guys keep your oversized aggressive "fighting" dogs. However, when one of your muts injures or kills someone, you take responsibility for it. There are a lot of other people that said the same things about how their pit bulls weren't aggressive and weren't bred for fighting and guess what? their damned dog attacked a kid. I don't see how your dogs are any better than all of the other pit bulls that have attacked people.

Anyway, I give up on using logic. It just isn't working. I hope your dogs get run over by a Greyhound (bus that is).

dude your a sissy....most PitBulls as you call them are about 50 65 lbs. That is not a big dog. YOU ARE WRONG WHEN YOU SAY THEY WHERE ORIGINALLY BREAD TO FIGHT. Not until lately have they been bread to fight. I would also assume that more people are bitten by Lasa Apsos but who the hell is going to report that. I have an American bull Terrier and her name is Justice and if you step one foot inside of my house or land..............

She will lick you until you drown in dog slobber.

IT ISN'T THE DOG IT IS THE WAY THEY HAVE BEEN TRAINED AND BREAD.

 

[Evil_Frisky]

Damn..

this thing still going and going

 

[mountain muscle]

I thought they required statistics in your educational background.

Samples of 1 or 2 are insignificant.

Findings that Pitts and some other breed are involved in 50% of fatal attacks is .... significant.

They are the only breed illegal in Denver. Deal with that.

Tboy if we are using those types of statistics then...

We should ban the type of vehichle involved in the most fatal car accidents.
The sex that is involved in the most fatal accidents should also be banned from driving.
The age group should as well.

Or we should teach people to drive responsibly and punish those that don't.
Nah let's just ban the vehicles.

The owner makes all the difference in the world with any type of dog. Pitts and Rotts are strong animals, that might have something to do with the fatalities in attacks.
The little, yappy, sweater wearing rat-dogs I have seen are way more aggressive and bite far more often. They just don't do much damage.
I am still deciding between an American Staffordshire Terrier and Boxer.

 

[ZKaudio]

i think boxers are generally more "add" prone and high strung. Other than that, they are both GREAT breeds.

 

[Fast Twitch Fiber]

Tboy if we are using those types of statistics then...

We should ban the type of vehichle involved in the most fatal car accidents.
The sex that is involved in the most fatal accidents should also be banned from driving.
The age group should as well.

Or we should teach people to drive responsibly and punish those that don't.
Nah let's just ban the vehicles.

The owner makes all the difference in the world with any type of dog. Pitts and Rotts are strong animals, that might have something to do with the fatalities in attacks.
The little, yappy, sweater wearing rat-dogs I have seen are way more aggressive and bite far more often. They just don't do much damage.
I am still deciding between an American Staffordshire Terrier and Boxer.

Dude, if you can find one or two vehicle types that make up 1-3% of the total vehicles on the road but account for 50% or more of highway fatalities, then by all means ban the fuck out of that vehicle. It's just not safe.

What part of this do you not understand? Breeds making up one to three percent of the dog population are responsible for more than 50% of dog attack deaths but you keep insisting that there is no relationship between the breed and it's capability for aggressiveness. You suffer from a serious case of denial my friend.