Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Non-federally Controlled Indian Land And Juice....

  • Thread starter Thread starter HULKSTER
  • Start date Start date
HULKSTER said:


That's fucking bullshit. So in reality, after all this crap about "giving back" to the Indians what the white man took, and all the great benefits and tax breaks they now enjoy compared to the average U.S. citizen, THEY, AS A PEOPLE, STILL DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THEIR OWN LAWS AND LIVE THEIR OWN LIVES. They must do what the federal government orders them to do, BASED ON THE WHITE MAN'S LAWS. This is total bullshit. Who the fuck does Uncle Sam think he is? The current, sitting U.S. Federal Government needs to be overthrown. Additionally, the FBI, CIA, NSA and IRS need to have their roles dramitically reduced, official taxpayer and corporate funded political parties need to be abolished, and a Libertarian-style government, set in the ideals of Thomas Jefferson, instituted. And for those in law enforcement/gov. reading this, this is my Constitutionally-protected 1st Amendment Right to FREE SPEECH, so none of you jerkoffs can do a damn thing about it!

Maybe we should let the Indians set up terrorist training camps on the reservations inside state borders or allow them to cultivate and process coca leaves into cocaine. Sorry you do not like the answer. Next time just ask your friend of a friend who lives on the reservation. The Indians are protected from criminal acts of others and others are protected from the criminal acts of Indians. And Indians are allowed to use the state courts (even though they don't pay taxes to the state) to sue other Indians or residents of the state. You have a problem with that?
 
BBkingpin said:


Maybe we should let the Indians set up terrorist training camps on the reservations inside state borders or allow them to cultivate and process coca leaves into cocaine. Sorry you do not like the answer. Next time just ask your friend of a friend who lives on the reservation. The Indians are protected from criminal acts of others and others are protected from the criminal acts of Indians. And Indians are allowed to use the state courts (even though they don't pay taxes to the state) to sue other Indians or residents of the state. You have a problem with that?

YES! The Indians should have their own, sovreign nation/country. Whites literally STOLE THE LAND FROM THE INDIANS! It is not for Americans, using Christian/Biblical laws and principles derived from Christian WASPS, to steal the Indians land, and then force them to live under OUR LAWS AND REGULATIONS because we were "generous" to let them not have to pay taxes on their reservations. How nice of the US Government! THEY have decided that the Indians don't have to pay tax on their OWN LAND! Let me tell you something, BBKing. God will Judge us by how we treat the less fortunate, powerful, poor and the weak. And the US, as a whole, is an asshole that treats any person, peoples or country it doesn't like, FOR ANY REASON, like crap. Even the Roman Empire couldn't last forever; one day, the end will come for the US, or at the very least, it will not be THE most powerful nation on earth. And when that happens, the US should expect no mercy from our more powerful enemies.
 
Maybe the Anglo-Saxons should return Great Britain to the Celts. Why do people from every country on Earth leave their "sovereign lands" and move to the United States and its "oppressive" systems of laws? If you really want anarchy, that means law of the jungle. Do you think you would survive? It is not the strong that survive but the strong and smart. I am done with this nonsense back-and-forth. If anyone other than Hulkster has a question, I will gladly put forth the time and effort as I did for him. And a little gratitude goes a long way.
 
BBkingpin said:

Last time I checked, a law degree doesn't equate with common sense, intelligence and abilities. It just means you have a goddamn law degree. Do you know how many doctors, lawyers, etc. finished dead last, or near dead last in their graduating classes, but because they barely received a degree, all of a sudden they are now "professionals", "experts", etc? Please, keep your over-priced piece of sheepskin.
 
HULKSTER said:


Last time I checked, a law degree doesn't equate with common sense, intelligence and abilities. It just means you have a goddamn law degree. Do you know how many doctors, lawyers, etc. finished dead last, or near dead last in their graduating classes, but because they barely received a degree, all of a sudden they are now "professionals", "experts", etc? Please, keep your over-priced piece of sheepskin.

I would ask all moderators on this forum never to answer another one of your questions. You are the piece of shit who comes here asking these stupid questions then ranting and raving about libertarianism when you don't like the answers. Sorry we have laws you numbskull. Aren't you the idiot that one of the older vets did a thread on at the anabolics board regarding your childish antics? You really have a way with people.
 
Last edited:
BBkingpin said:


I would ask all moderators on this forum never to answer another one of your questions. You are the piece of shit who comes here asking these stupid questions then ranting and raving about libertarianism when you don't like the answers. Sorry we have laws you numbskull. Aren't you the idiot that one of the older vets did a thread on at the anabolics board regarding your childish antics? You really have a way with people.

Easy BB... Easy. :) I know you have more of it in yourself to keep it cool... :)

I'm pretty sure that if you have a pack sent to an Indian Reservation, US Laws would apply. I can think of one instance... where the US Courts outlawed Peyote for religeous ceremonies... The Indian Reservations are STILL part of the United States... they are not a seperate nation. Our laws still apply there.

Thanks for the extra research BB... I appreciate it.

And please... this isn't directed at ANYONE in particular... keep all insults to a non-cursing and toned down manner... please be respectful of all members of the board.

C-ditty
 
Citruscide said:


Easy BB... Easy. :) I know you have more of it in yourself to keep it cool... :)

I'm pretty sure that if you have a pack sent to an Indian Reservation, US Laws would apply. I can think of one instance... where the US Courts outlawed Peyote for religeous ceremonies... The Indian Reservations are STILL part of the United States... they are not a seperate nation. Our laws still apply there.

Thanks for the extra research BB... I appreciate it.

And please... this isn't directed at ANYONE in particular... keep all insults to a non-cursing and toned down manner... please be respectful of all members of the board.

C-ditty

This is the remark that set me off -- "Please, keep your over-priced piece of sheepskin." And let me show you how he singled me out for help:

HULKSTER
Elite Bodybuilder



Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Right here
Posts: 1632
Gender: M
Country:
Offline
(post #13)


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by BBkingpin


Bullshit. A car is impouded when a person is put under arrest. There is no consent requirement. Basically, do not put anything in your car. Cops do not know or respect the minutia of search and seizure laws. And there is very little privacy expectation in your vehicle according to the U.S. Supreme Court. There is little, if anything, the police cannot search in your car. Even if you get the evidence suppressed and charges dismissed, (1) it will take an attorney who will only go to bat for you after you pay a hefty retainer, and (2) they do not return the evidence to you. It is a no-win situation. Do not leave anything in your car.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Since your a lawyer, can you answer my question that no one else will answer?

I want to know what the federal and/or state governments can do if "someone" would import internationally-sent AAS directly to a "supposedly" NON-FEDERALLY CONTROLLED INDIAN RESERVATION? Can we get around state AND federal AAS laws by having AAS sent to NON-FEDERAL Indian land? If not, then our next best bets are Alaska and Vermont, where they are unscheduled and not-regulated in any way.


__________________
I am in no way selling, distributing, condoning, soliciting or advertising the use of illegal drugs of any kind. All statements I have made or will make are for entertainment purposes only. Any advice I give should not take the place of qualified medical advice.




Edit Sig | Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

16-Apr-2003 10:35 PM



BBkingpin
Pro Bodybuilder



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: O.C., CA
Posts: 1133
Gender: ?
Country:
Online
(post #14)


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by HULKSTER


Since your a lawyer, can you answer my question that no one else will answer?

I want to know what the federal and/or state governments can do if "someone" would import internationally-sent AAS directly to a "supposedly" NON-FEDERALLY CONTROLLED INDIAN RESERVATION? Can we get around state AND federal AAS laws by having AAS sent to NON-FEDERAL Indian land? If not, then our next best bets are Alaska and Vermont, where they are unscheduled and not-regulated in any way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I'll try to give you an answer by tomorrow. I don't have an answer off the top of my head and no time at the moment to research it.


__________________
Attorney at Law, Licensed in Illinois, Pennsylvania, New Jersey





Edit Sig | Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

16-Apr-2003 10:45 PM



Sergeant
Good Bro



Registered: Apr 2001
Location: N.J.
Posts: 94
Gender: M
Country:
Offline
(post #15)

THEN THIS IS THE WAY HE RESPONDS AFTER I DO THE RESEARCH TO ANSWER HIS QUESTION! HE INSULTED YOU AS WELL WHEN HE MADE THAT REMARK. IF IT IS JUST AN "OVERPRICED PIECE OF SHEEP SKIN" AND WE ARE WITHOUT "INTELLIGENCE OR ABILITY", WHY DOES HE COME TO US (HE SINGLED ME OUT) FOR HELP? POINT IS THE GUY IS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT OF SOMEONE WHO PAID -- OR "OVER" PAYED -- FOR AN EDUCATION HE DOES NOT HAVE AND FOR LEGAL ADVICE HE IS NOT PAYING FOR.
 
BBkingpin said:


This is the remark that set me off -- "Please, keep your over-priced piece of sheepskin." And let me show you how he singled me out for help:

HULKSTER
Elite Bodybuilder



Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Right here
Posts: 1632
Gender: M
Country:
Offline
(post #13)


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by BBkingpin


Bullshit. A car is impouded when a person is put under arrest. There is no consent requirement. Basically, do not put anything in your car. Cops do not know or respect the minutia of search and seizure laws. And there is very little privacy expectation in your vehicle according to the U.S. Supreme Court. There is little, if anything, the police cannot search in your car. Even if you get the evidence suppressed and charges dismissed, (1) it will take an attorney who will only go to bat for you after you pay a hefty retainer, and (2) they do not return the evidence to you. It is a no-win situation. Do not leave anything in your car.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Since your a lawyer, can you answer my question that no one else will answer?

I want to know what the federal and/or state governments can do if "someone" would import internationally-sent AAS directly to a "supposedly" NON-FEDERALLY CONTROLLED INDIAN RESERVATION? Can we get around state AND federal AAS laws by having AAS sent to NON-FEDERAL Indian land? If not, then our next best bets are Alaska and Vermont, where they are unscheduled and not-regulated in any way.


__________________
I am in no way selling, distributing, condoning, soliciting or advertising the use of illegal drugs of any kind. All statements I have made or will make are for entertainment purposes only. Any advice I give should not take the place of qualified medical advice.




Edit Sig | Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

16-Apr-2003 10:35 PM



BBkingpin
Pro Bodybuilder



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: O.C., CA
Posts: 1133
Gender: ?
Country:
Online
(post #14)


quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by HULKSTER


Since your a lawyer, can you answer my question that no one else will answer?

I want to know what the federal and/or state governments can do if "someone" would import internationally-sent AAS directly to a "supposedly" NON-FEDERALLY CONTROLLED INDIAN RESERVATION? Can we get around state AND federal AAS laws by having AAS sent to NON-FEDERAL Indian land? If not, then our next best bets are Alaska and Vermont, where they are unscheduled and not-regulated in any way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I'll try to give you an answer by tomorrow. I don't have an answer off the top of my head and no time at the moment to research it.


__________________
Attorney at Law, Licensed in Illinois, Pennsylvania, New Jersey





Edit Sig | Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

16-Apr-2003 10:45 PM



Sergeant
Good Bro



Registered: Apr 2001
Location: N.J.
Posts: 94
Gender: M
Country:
Offline
(post #15)

THEN THIS IS THE WAY HE RESPONDS AFTER I DO THE RESEARCH TO ANSWER HIS QUESTION! HE INSULTED YOU AS WELL WHEN HE MADE THAT REMARK. IF IT IS JUST AN "OVERPRICED PIECE OF SHEEP SKIN" AND WE ARE WITHOUT "INTELLIGENCE OR ABILITY", WHY DOES HE COME TO US (HE SINGLED ME OUT) FOR HELP? POINT IS THE GUY IS NOT WORTH THE EFFORT OF SOMEONE WHO PAID -- OR "OVER" PAYED -- FOR AN EDUCATION HE DOES NOT HAVE AND FOR LEGAL ADVICE HE IS NOT PAYING FOR.

NO, I SAID THAT SHIT BECAUSE YOUR THE ONE WHO STARTED THROWING INSULTS AROUND. When I stated that the American Government robbed land from Native Americans, and that not only should they get it back, but be able to live as a sovereign nation/country with their own laws, lifestyles and customs as to how they see fit, you started off with some nonsense that Indians might start "terrorist training camps", did you not? So automitically, the Indians can't do what they want with their OWN LAND because of the EXTREMELY MINISCULE possibility that they might do something that bugs the US Government. BOO FUCKIN' HOO!! It's THEIR LAND! The US had no right to take their land, and furthermore, then state that after we FINALLY gave the Indians their land back, that they will still have to live under the white man's laws and customs. That's bullshit. The Indians have an undeniable, rightful claim to their lands, and the US Government is nothing but a fascist, anti-liberty bully for taking away Indians' freedoms of self-rule and government.

And now the US Government is taking their focus off the Indians, and targeting individual Americans with Patriot Acts I and II, as well as a host of other UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS that have greatly eroded Americans' freedoms under the guise of defeating terrorists.
 
Top Bottom