Kobe's Accuser Was Institutionalized Last Winter (Bitch Be CRAZY!)

[DcupSheepNipples]

No, I have never been rapped.

What a shame!

As far as the case as I said from day one she will commit suicide and the case will be dropped!

 

[Silent Method]

Perhaps he did rape her. Perhaps not. What's your beef with me?

Oh, wait a minute. I've got it. You don't like me because I haven't automatically made up my mind in favor of the alleged victim, right?

 

[DeepZenPill]

I'm tired of hearing all the bitching about her identity being made public. Kobe is innocent until proven guilty, but it doesn't matter now. Even if he was innocent this is going to be a gigantic black mark on his reputation. Why should there be a double standard? If anyone's identity should be kept secret, it should be BOTH, until a verdict is read. But that will never happen.

Right to a fair trial my ass. Kobe's been tried, convicted, and hanged already in the public's eye.

 

[anabolicmd]

Oh, wait a minute. I've got it. You don't like me because I haven't automatically made up my mind in favor of the alleged victim, right?

Well if you must know, I dont like it when people apply their ignorant standards to other peoples problems, but I dont dislike you personally.

 

[Silent Method]

Well if you must know, I dont like it when people apply their ignorant standards to other peoples problems, but I dont dislike you personally.

"Sanity," or lack thereof, is nothing more than comparison to a collective of predominant standards. In regard to the norm of psychological behavior, Poink said it best - Bitch be crazy.


Once again, I really haven't formed an opinion as to the probability of guilt in this case. However, it seems that a great many have made up their minds in favor of the word of the woman.

 

[anabolicmd]

it seems that a great many have made up their minds in favor of the word of the woman.

Well all other things being equal, she was promiscuous, but he was adulterous. Hes already done one thing wrong so its on him.

 

[Silent Method]

Well all other things being equal, she was promiscuous, but he was adulterous. Hes already done one thing wrong so its on him.

I believe that this attitude is illogical, irresponsible, and downright ridiculous. What do you mean "it's on him?"

If you want to argue that he deserves to be shat on due to his actions and, in the karmic scheme of things, this might be the way it's going down, then fine, I have no real problem with that.

However, insinuating that we should hold him culpable to these claims in our minds because of a sperate and established sin is silly at best and downright deadly at worst.

(BTW, an unmarried woman having sex with a married man is, by definition, committing adultery as well as the man.)