Illegal drug talk = condoned. Illegal sex talk = condemned?

[Phaded]

i suck dick for money

 

[slat1]

I knew someone said "illegal sex"
So.. hey... whats going on?

 

[jnevin]

i suck dick for money

If it was pro bono I'd believe your other thread.

 

[samoth]

Deleted with no word of anything from anyone.

Stand up peoples we have round here, I must say.

I'm assuming you mean the 'underage sexing' thread (just guessing). Chances are that it was deleted for the pictures. The general rule of thumb is, "If she looks too young, she probably is".

 

[jnevin]

 

[KillahBee]

I'm assuming you mean the 'underage sexing' thread (just guessing). Chances are that it was deleted for the pictures. The general rule of thumb is, "If she looks too young, she probably is".

That's a pretty pathetic rule of thumb. So basically you guys live by the "I'm going to make snap judgments based on one still, airbrushed picture" theory? Smart moves right there.

 

[KillahBee]

bwahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[jnevin]

bwahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah I liked that one too.

 

[samoth]

That's a pretty pathetic rule of thumb. So basically you guys live by the "I'm going to make snap judgments based on one still, airbrushed picture" theory? Smart moves right there.

Why would any board even want to let there be a question as to whether there's child pornography on it or not? Uh, sorry, but this is pretty much set in stone.

There's no well-defined line based entirely upon one visual representation. Therefore, EF defined the line itself (years ago): "If she looks to young, she probably is" --> thread gone.

This isn't anything new.

 

[blut wump]

There was a story recently of a guy being seduced by a ten-year old girl. By all reports he was utterly aghast to be told her age after he was arrested.

I think if they look too young then they are probably still in nappies these days.