Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

If homosexuality is a disease...

Status
Not open for further replies.
...I was pretty sure you were going to say, "Then I'm the cure." Like in the movie Cobra...

I was already to call you gay. You ruined it.
 
i read an interesting theory the other day about gayness being a trait that was actually useful to a social group. the gist of it was that the gay people in a social group could still contribute communally without the aggression/angst that normally goes hand in hand with competition for mates/resources.

same thing is happening today macrosocially, where these people are dying childless and leaving a fortune to the state. hm. i need to befriend some dying gays, so i can retire (im str8 ;))
 
It's a genetic anomaly. There have been studies upon studies which point to this. If you ask a straight up homosexual if they were born that way, chances are they will say yes.
 
OMEGA said:
its a choice and or gentic flaw

both of which can be solved by choice


Interesting logic :rolleyes: I'll indulge your idea for a moment here though. Let's roll with the genetic thing. If it is genetic then they have no choice in who they find attractive. They could choose to ignore those feelings but it would probably be just as easy as you ignoring your desires for women and sleeping with a man all the time.
 
crew9 said:
Interesting logic :rolleyes: I'll indulge your idea for a moment here though. Let's roll with the genetic thing. If it is genetic then they have no choice in who they find attractive. They could choose to ignore those feelings but it would probably be just as easy as you ignoring your desires for women and sleeping with a man all the time.

I have the desire to run through every woman I see
yet I use choice to over ride thet petty and deconstructive instinct.

IF you have the instinct to be gay, then it s a flaw plain in simple.
There are proven mechanisms that show that a switch goes off especially in over popluated areas ( in animal models) at the genetic level.

sorry if my words are harsh but sometimes the truth is not very easy to hear.
 
OMEGA said:
I have the desire to run through every woman I see
yet I use choice to over ride thet petty and deconstructive instinct.

IF you have the instinct to be gay, then it s a flaw plain in simple.
There are proven mechanisms that show that a switch goes off especially in over popluated areas ( in animal models) at the genetic level.

sorry if my words are harsh but sometimes the truth is not very easy to hear.

I'm glad that you mentioned the bit about over populated areas because I've always thought that homosexuality was a genetic thing brought about as a form of population control. If you agree with that then how can you call it a flaw. You could say albinism, or a heart defect, or an extra digit would be a flaw but to say homosexuality is a flaw?

I commend you on your willpower to not rape and pillage every attractive women you see but that's hardly the same thing. You're not choosing to go against your desires you're just showing restraint.
 
I dont know some people say its a choice but i dis agree i dont choose to be with women i just do there is some hormone inside that is attrected to women. If you choose to be with women then you ould choose to be with a man. There is something in my brain that says ya for women. It has to be a brain thing i think.
 
crew9 said:
I'm glad that you mentioned the bit about over populated areas because I've always thought that homosexuality was a genetic thing brought about as a form of population control. If you agree with that then how can you call it a flaw. You could say albinism, or a heart defect, or an extra digit would be a flaw but to say homosexuality is a flaw?

.

Homosexuality is a flaw
if you dont over ride it.
It is a flaw "proper" because you wont be able to procreate in a normal world

Gay Adoption over rides this which is wrong as well and should be illegal.
It imposes a false "schematic" of life on an innocent new born. Not to mention stress.

Hetero sexual Couples that cant proceate at least offer a healthy "schematic"
of living to a newborn.

as I said not easy to here but true non the less.......

.
 
OMEGA said:
Homosexuality is a flaw
if you dont over ride it.
It is a flaw "proper" because you wont be able to procreate in a normal world

Gay Adoption over rides this which is wrong as well and should be illegal.
It imposes a false "skematic" of life on an innocent new born. Not to mention stress.

Hetero sexual Couples that cant proceate at least offer a healthy "schematic"
of living to a newborn.

as I said not easy to here but true non the less.......

.

I don't disagree that gay adoption could cause stress to the child especially in the grade school years. It would be great though if you could post the unbiased research that supports your claims because otherwise it sounds a lot less like "truths" and a lot more like opinion.

In my opinion "religious" people have a lot to learn about practicing what they preach from the amish.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15174741/
 
Nice question for Sunday morning


The older I get the more I think it has to be a physical disease as opposed to a mental disorder.

Some mix up of chromosomes, or X & Y are backwards,


Guys don’t make the choice, but if you go to prison it gets all screwed up.


If you took drugs, booze and prison out of the equation it might be understandable, but I doubt it.


I don’t think God decided,

Oh,

It would be fun to mess with some of these guys and make them all queer.


I good thing the queers are all good looking so that takes them out of the dating scène.


Johnny Cakes based upon your avatar I assumed you were gay? Correct?
 
solidspine said:
Johnny Cakes based upon your avatar I assumed you were gay? Correct?

I am a spokesperson for Johnny Cakes and he said this is a slogan used in jest to protest homophobia.
 
I am a spokesperson for Johnny Cakes and he said this is a slogan used in jest to protest homophobia.
Seriously,


I am not wide awake are you just messing with me?


Because I thought he was just a gay guys asking honest questions
 
crew9 said:
I don't disagree that gay adoption could cause stress to the child especially in the grade school years


grade shcool years? and where did you come up with that?
research?

also note that any "studies" on this issue will most likely be very biased for one side or another.

My rule is based on LAW , natural LAW to be specific.

an un-natural event such as gay adoption is an imposition of a new born with a false schema of existance, and something that could not be had unless you override it with adoption........
 
OMEGA said:
grade shcool years? and where did you come up with that?
research?

also note that any "studies" on this issue will most likely be very biased for one side or another.

My rule is based on LAW , natural LAW to be specific.

an un-natural event such as gay adoption is an imposition of a new born with a false schema of existance, and something that could not be had unless you override it with adoption........


I was stating my opinion. Nowhere did I claim it to be a truth or LAW. The reason behind my opinion is because children at that age can be very cruel. Especially towards those whom they perceive to be different.
 
velvett said:
Does anyone remember when the used make left handed kids write with their right hands?
no, but my grandparents did it to my mother. she can happily switch writing hands and keep on writing...though the script looks different

supposedly doing that sort of thing (messing iwth normal left/right brain domination) messes you up mentally, and in the case of my mother, all i can say to that theory is AMEN
 
OMEGA said:
grade shcool years? and where did you come up with that?
research?

also note that any "studies" on this issue will most likely be very biased for one side or another.

My rule is based on LAW , natural LAW to be specific.

an un-natural event such as gay adoption is an imposition of a new born with a false schema of existance, and something that could not be had unless you override it with adoption........
your 'natural law' argument is flawed, in that you assume that mating occurs in (relative) isolation, between copulating couples, and does not take into consideration the positive support role that may be played by a sexually neutral person in a social group (lets say, a villiage or town)

just for arguments sake, lets say 2 boys are born twins. one is gay, one is straight. lets call them Alien Amp Pharm and Gambino ;). the straight one (NOT alien amp pharm) finds a mate (lets call her superqt ;) ) and mad copulation commences, resulting in a child. lets call the child...Needto ;). Within the social group, the child may benefit from having 2 male guardians in a solid family unit, thereby growing into a more viable adult male, and passing on both his fathers str8 genes and alien amp pharms contaminated :rainbow: genes, all wrapped in a nympho :qt: shell. this scenario clearly illustrates that there truly may be gold at the end of the :rainbow: ( :lmao: )

what i like most about my little story is that its realistic - ie a family unit with superqt as the mother, gambino as the father, and aap as the leg humping fag uncle will, without a doubt, result in a retard ;)
 
its not flawed

what I presented is a model of sustainable reality, you know the one that got Humans here over eons?

all else is flawed choice layered over genes and envronment.......
to over ride it by adoption is flawed in the truest sense of that word.
 
OMEGA said:
its not flawed

what I presented is a model of sustainable reality, you know the one that got Humans here over eons?

all else is flawed choice layered over genes and envronment.......
to over ride it by adoption is flawed in the truest sense of that word.
i disagree. a childs survival and replication value is not neccessarily affected negatively by being raised by a homosexual couple.

besides, so long as humans continue to live in large groups, and breeding couples largely outnumber homosexuals (ie exactly the model of sustainable reproductive reality that got us here) then a symbiotic role may be played by gay people to the benefit of all
 
velvett said:
Does anyone remember when the used make left handed kids write with their right hands?


they did that bullshit to me and to this day my handwriting is so horrible, its actually prevented me from getting a few jobs.
 
mightymouse69 said:
I am a spokesperson for Johnny Cakes and he said this is a slogan used in jest to protest homophobia.
LOLOLOL@ur his spokesperson
 
GoldenDelicious said:
also, i think we should go to eastern europe and chase hotties :p

agreed in theory:)

I just cant use women for my own pleasure
and turn them into an object
the handfull of times I did I felt horrid

that was someones daughter........
and a child of God
 
OMEGA said:
agreed in theory:)

I just cant use women for my own pleasure
the handfull of times I did I felt horrid

that was somones daughter........
fine, lets go use them for my pleasure ;)

in seriousness though, you dont make any sense. so long as their life wholistically improves as a result of their interaction with you, and you disclosed your true intentions, then you should feel no guilt at all about "using" someone - in fact, rationally, with holding that experience is actually immoral, since you chose the greater of two evils

trust me on this. how about serbia? ;)
 
Damn...havent any of you guys heard of "Occam's razor"?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

If people would stop trying to be so fucking smart and overanalyze everything they would realize what homosexuality really is.

It is simply mother nature's way of controlling our severe overpopulation.

If you look at ANY species on earth...everytime they get overpopulated something happens to them, disease,famine,Sterility, their predators increase,etc,etc.

it's really not that difficult to grasp.
 
GoldenDelicious said:
fine, lets go use them for my pleasure ;)

in seriousness though, you dont make any sense. so long as their life wholistically improves as a result of their interaction with you, and you disclosed your true intentions, then you should feel no guilt at all about "using" someone - in fact, rationally, with holding that experience is actually immoral, since you chose the greater of two evils

trust me on this. how about serbia? ;)


LOL
your a good bro

I agree with the disclosing of intent IF! you choose to do so.

However in my opinion the act of just having sex, and having it with many people over rides AN emotional aspect of us that seeks to "bond" with other long term.

One could see how this is natural since ultimatley families are nourished by the stable environment of a Father and Mother that are monogmous.

But I believe the root is a spiritual one, something happens to two people when they grow to love each other, a bond that would never be violated by others or cheating, a bond of permanance........
 
Nobody would CHOOSE to be gay and anyone who's known gay people well wouldn't say anything that stupid.

Hating someone for the being the way they were born -- believing they can change that behavior by simply DECIDING to -- is ignorance. That's like saying to an epileptic that if they would just decide to stop having seizures they could stop taking their medicine and won't seize anymore.

Why hate anyone because of how they love? Who does it hurt? I'll never understand that.
 
I'm a stupidassphobe
I don't like even being around stupidasses
 
GoldenDelicious said:
your 'natural law' argument is flawed, in that you assume that mating occurs in (relative) isolation, between copulating couples, and does not take into consideration the positive support role that may be played by a sexually neutral person in a social group (lets say, a villiage or town)

just for arguments sake, lets say 2 boys are born twins. one is gay, one is straight. lets call them Alien Amp Pharm and Gambino ;). the straight one (NOT alien amp pharm) finds a mate (lets call her superqt ;) ) and mad copulation commences, resulting in a child. lets call the child...Needto ;). Within the social group, the child may benefit from having 2 male guardians in a solid family unit, thereby growing into a more viable adult male, and passing on both his fathers str8 genes and alien amp pharms contaminated :rainbow: genes, all wrapped in a nympho :qt: shell. this scenario clearly illustrates that there truly may be gold at the end of the :rainbow: ( :lmao: )

what i like most about my little story is that its realistic - ie a family unit with superqt as the mother, gambino as the father, and aap as the leg humping fag uncle will, without a doubt, result in a retard ;)

lol funny bastard
 
GoldenDelicious said:
your 'natural law' argument is flawed, in that you assume that mating occurs in (relative) isolation, between copulating couples, and does not take into consideration the positive support role that may be played by a sexually neutral person in a social group (lets say, a villiage or town)

just for arguments sake, lets say 2 boys are born twins. one is gay, one is straight. lets call them Alien Amp Pharm and Gambino ;). the straight one (NOT alien amp pharm) finds a mate (lets call her superqt ;) ) and mad copulation commences, resulting in a child. lets call the child...Needto ;). Within the social group, the child may benefit from having 2 male guardians in a solid family unit, thereby growing into a more viable adult male, and passing on both his fathers str8 genes and alien amp pharms contaminated :rainbow: genes, all wrapped in a nympho :qt: shell. this scenario clearly illustrates that there truly may be gold at the end of the :rainbow: ( :lmao: )

what i like most about my little story is that its realistic - ie a family unit with superqt as the mother, gambino as the father, and aap as the leg humping fag uncle will, without a doubt, result in a retard ;)

HAHA, How did I miss this?
Heck, now I wonder how many times I've never caught you talking about me in the past.
:worried:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom