OMEGA said:
grade shcool years? and where did you come up with that?
research?
also note that any "studies" on this issue will most likely be very biased for one side or another.
My rule is based on LAW , natural LAW to be specific.
an un-natural event such as gay adoption is an imposition of a new born with a false schema of existance, and something that could not be had unless you override it with adoption........
your 'natural law' argument is flawed, in that you assume that mating occurs in (relative) isolation, between copulating couples, and does not take into consideration the positive support role that may be played by a sexually neutral person in a social group (lets say, a villiage or town)
just for arguments sake, lets say 2 boys are born twins. one is gay, one is straight. lets call them Alien Amp Pharm and Gambino
. the straight one (NOT alien amp pharm) finds a mate (lets call her superqt
) and mad copulation commences, resulting in a child. lets call the child...Needto
. Within the social group, the child may benefit from having 2 male guardians in a solid family unit, thereby growing into a more viable adult male, and passing on both his fathers str8 genes and alien amp pharms contaminated
genes, all wrapped in a nympho
shell. this scenario clearly illustrates that there truly may be gold at the end of the
(
)
what i like most about my little story is that its realistic - ie a family unit with superqt as the mother, gambino as the father, and aap as the leg humping fag uncle will, without a doubt, result in a retard